Cargando…

Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Region in 15 Patients by Cone Beam Computed Tomography at a Single Center in South India

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to evaluate orthodontic mini-implant placement in the maxillary anterior alveolar region by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in 15 patients at a single center in South India. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 15 CBCT scans of orthodontic patients after completion o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murugesan, Arathi, Dinesh, S.P. Saravana, Pandian, Srirengalakshmi Muthuswamy, Solanki, Lichi Ashwin, Alshehri, Abdulrahman, Awadh, Wael, Alzahrani, Khalid J., Alsharif, Khalaf F., Alnfiai, Mrim M., Mathew, Reji, El-Bialy, Tarek, Baeshen, Hosam Ali, Bhandi, Shilpa, Raj, A. Thirumal, Patil, Shankargouda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36284468
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937949
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to evaluate orthodontic mini-implant placement in the maxillary anterior alveolar region by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in 15 patients at a single center in South India. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 15 CBCT scans of orthodontic patients after completion of leveling and aligning stage were included. The thickness of labial alveolar bone, labio-palatal bone, and inter-radicular distance between the maxillary central incisors (U1-U1), maxillary central and lateral incisor (U1–U2), and maxillary lateral incisor and canine (U2–U3) at vertical levels 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm above the interdental cementoenamel junction were measured. Descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and Tukey post hoc tests were done to assess the differences among the groups. An independent t test was done to analyze differences by sex. RESULTS: The thickness of cortical bone in the labial region was higher in the U2–U3 site than in the U1-U1 site, at a height of 4 mm. Also, there was a significant difference between 4 mm and 8 mm heights in the U2–U3 region. No significant difference was noted in bone dimensions among men and women and in the labio-palatal bone thickness among the different sites. The inter-radicular distance was the highest between the U2–U3 site, while it was the lowest in the U1–U2 site. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this center showed that when CBCT was used to evaluate orthodontic mini-implant placement in the maxillary anterior alveolar region, the U2–U3 and U1-U1 locations at heights between 6 mm to 8 mm apical to the interdental cementoenamel junction were optimal for placement of the mini-implants.