Cargando…

A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials

Blood feeding is a necessary part of laboratory studies involving mosquitoes and other hematophagous arthropods of interest in medical and ecological research. However, methods involving hosts may present serious risks, require ethics approvals and can be expensive. Here we describe an insect blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faber, Peter A., Dorai, Ashritha J.A.P.S., Chown, Steven L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325181
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14247
_version_ 1784821436870819840
author Faber, Peter A.
Dorai, Ashritha J.A.P.S.
Chown, Steven L.
author_facet Faber, Peter A.
Dorai, Ashritha J.A.P.S.
Chown, Steven L.
author_sort Faber, Peter A.
collection PubMed
description Blood feeding is a necessary part of laboratory studies involving mosquitoes and other hematophagous arthropods of interest in medical and ecological research. However, methods involving hosts may present serious risks, require ethics approvals and can be expensive. Here we describe an insect blood feeder made using common laboratory materials, which is low cost (<US$100) and can be constructed and operated with little technical expertise. We compared the blood feeder containing an artificial blood diet, Skitosnack, to direct human arm feeding for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), in terms of engorgement rate, fecundity and hatch rate. No significant difference in fecundity between the two approaches was found, (mean ± SD); direct human arm: 56 ± 26 eggs/female, artificial method: 47 ± 25 eggs/female, P = 0.569. Engorgement rates (direct human arm: 97.8 ± 4%, artificial: 64.1 ± 23%, P < 0.05) and hatch rates (direct human arm: 75 ± 12%, artificial: 59 ± 14%, P < 0.05) were lower in the artificially fed mosquitoes. Despite these differences, we maintained a healthy mosquito colony for 10 generations using the artificial feeding approach. Results from this comparison are within the range of other studies which compared direct host feeding with an artificial feeding method. We anticipate that the blood feeder presented here could substantially reduce costs usually required to establish a standardised and effective blood feeding method for maintaining mosquito colonies or conducting experiments, extending the capability of laboratories especially where research resources are limited, but vector-borne diseases common.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9620972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96209722022-11-01 A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials Faber, Peter A. Dorai, Ashritha J.A.P.S. Chown, Steven L. PeerJ Biotechnology Blood feeding is a necessary part of laboratory studies involving mosquitoes and other hematophagous arthropods of interest in medical and ecological research. However, methods involving hosts may present serious risks, require ethics approvals and can be expensive. Here we describe an insect blood feeder made using common laboratory materials, which is low cost (<US$100) and can be constructed and operated with little technical expertise. We compared the blood feeder containing an artificial blood diet, Skitosnack, to direct human arm feeding for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), in terms of engorgement rate, fecundity and hatch rate. No significant difference in fecundity between the two approaches was found, (mean ± SD); direct human arm: 56 ± 26 eggs/female, artificial method: 47 ± 25 eggs/female, P = 0.569. Engorgement rates (direct human arm: 97.8 ± 4%, artificial: 64.1 ± 23%, P < 0.05) and hatch rates (direct human arm: 75 ± 12%, artificial: 59 ± 14%, P < 0.05) were lower in the artificially fed mosquitoes. Despite these differences, we maintained a healthy mosquito colony for 10 generations using the artificial feeding approach. Results from this comparison are within the range of other studies which compared direct host feeding with an artificial feeding method. We anticipate that the blood feeder presented here could substantially reduce costs usually required to establish a standardised and effective blood feeding method for maintaining mosquito colonies or conducting experiments, extending the capability of laboratories especially where research resources are limited, but vector-borne diseases common. PeerJ Inc. 2022-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9620972/ /pubmed/36325181 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14247 Text en ©2022 Faber et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Biotechnology
Faber, Peter A.
Dorai, Ashritha J.A.P.S.
Chown, Steven L.
A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title_full A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title_fullStr A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title_full_unstemmed A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title_short A standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for Aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
title_sort standardised low-cost membrane blood-feeder for aedes aegypti made using common laboratory materials
topic Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9620972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325181
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14247
work_keys_str_mv AT faberpetera astandardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials
AT doraiashrithajaps astandardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials
AT chownstevenl astandardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials
AT faberpetera standardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials
AT doraiashrithajaps standardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials
AT chownstevenl standardisedlowcostmembranebloodfeederforaedesaegyptimadeusingcommonlaboratorymaterials