Cargando…
MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173 |
_version_ | 1784821534904287232 |
---|---|
author | Zong, Ya Lu, Zhiyuan Xu, Peipei Chen, Maoqi Deng, Lianfu Li, Sheng Zhang, Yingchun Xie, Qing Zhou, Ping |
author_facet | Zong, Ya Lu, Zhiyuan Xu, Peipei Chen, Maoqi Deng, Lianfu Li, Sheng Zhang, Yingchun Xie, Qing Zhou, Ping |
author_sort | Zong, Ya |
collection | PubMed |
description | MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10 healthy subjects at a United States (US) research center using different stimulus pulse widths (0.1, 0.2 ms) and total number of stimuli or steps (500, 1,000), and in 12 healthy subjects at a China research center using a 0.1 ms pulse width and 500 steps. MScanFit MUNE was derived using the default model parameters. A significantly higher MUNE was obtained using the shorter than longer pulse width; 84.70 ± 21.56 (500 steps) and 77.90 ± 27.62 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.1 ms vs. 67.60 ± 18.72 (500 steps) and 62.20 ± 15.82 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.2 ms (p < 0.05). However, MUNE was unrelated to the number of steps (500 vs. 1,000, p > 0.1). MUNE was significantly higher in persons studied in the China center (136.42 ± 32.46) than the US center (84.70 ± 21.56) despite each center using the same pulse widths and steps (p < 0.001). After excluding the ethnicity, age and experimenter factors, this significant difference is speculated to be partly related to different electrode size used in the two centers. The findings suggest that CMAP scan experimental parameters should remain consistent, so the MScanFit MUNE will not be compromised by non-physiological factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9621390 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96213902022-11-01 MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters Zong, Ya Lu, Zhiyuan Xu, Peipei Chen, Maoqi Deng, Lianfu Li, Sheng Zhang, Yingchun Xie, Qing Zhou, Ping Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10 healthy subjects at a United States (US) research center using different stimulus pulse widths (0.1, 0.2 ms) and total number of stimuli or steps (500, 1,000), and in 12 healthy subjects at a China research center using a 0.1 ms pulse width and 500 steps. MScanFit MUNE was derived using the default model parameters. A significantly higher MUNE was obtained using the shorter than longer pulse width; 84.70 ± 21.56 (500 steps) and 77.90 ± 27.62 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.1 ms vs. 67.60 ± 18.72 (500 steps) and 62.20 ± 15.82 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.2 ms (p < 0.05). However, MUNE was unrelated to the number of steps (500 vs. 1,000, p > 0.1). MUNE was significantly higher in persons studied in the China center (136.42 ± 32.46) than the US center (84.70 ± 21.56) despite each center using the same pulse widths and steps (p < 0.001). After excluding the ethnicity, age and experimenter factors, this significant difference is speculated to be partly related to different electrode size used in the two centers. The findings suggest that CMAP scan experimental parameters should remain consistent, so the MScanFit MUNE will not be compromised by non-physiological factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9621390/ /pubmed/36325193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zong, Lu, Xu, Chen, Deng, Li, Zhang, Xie and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Zong, Ya Lu, Zhiyuan Xu, Peipei Chen, Maoqi Deng, Lianfu Li, Sheng Zhang, Yingchun Xie, Qing Zhou, Ping MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title | MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title_full | MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title_fullStr | MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title_short | MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters |
title_sort | mscanfit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: findings from different experimental parameters |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621390/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zongya mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT luzhiyuan mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT xupeipei mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT chenmaoqi mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT denglianfu mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT lisheng mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT zhangyingchun mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT xieqing mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters AT zhouping mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters |