Cargando…

MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters

MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zong, Ya, Lu, Zhiyuan, Xu, Peipei, Chen, Maoqi, Deng, Lianfu, Li, Sheng, Zhang, Yingchun, Xie, Qing, Zhou, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173
_version_ 1784821534904287232
author Zong, Ya
Lu, Zhiyuan
Xu, Peipei
Chen, Maoqi
Deng, Lianfu
Li, Sheng
Zhang, Yingchun
Xie, Qing
Zhou, Ping
author_facet Zong, Ya
Lu, Zhiyuan
Xu, Peipei
Chen, Maoqi
Deng, Lianfu
Li, Sheng
Zhang, Yingchun
Xie, Qing
Zhou, Ping
author_sort Zong, Ya
collection PubMed
description MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10 healthy subjects at a United States (US) research center using different stimulus pulse widths (0.1, 0.2 ms) and total number of stimuli or steps (500, 1,000), and in 12 healthy subjects at a China research center using a 0.1 ms pulse width and 500 steps. MScanFit MUNE was derived using the default model parameters. A significantly higher MUNE was obtained using the shorter than longer pulse width; 84.70 ± 21.56 (500 steps) and 77.90 ± 27.62 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.1 ms vs. 67.60 ± 18.72 (500 steps) and 62.20 ± 15.82 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.2 ms (p < 0.05). However, MUNE was unrelated to the number of steps (500 vs. 1,000, p > 0.1). MUNE was significantly higher in persons studied in the China center (136.42 ± 32.46) than the US center (84.70 ± 21.56) despite each center using the same pulse widths and steps (p < 0.001). After excluding the ethnicity, age and experimenter factors, this significant difference is speculated to be partly related to different electrode size used in the two centers. The findings suggest that CMAP scan experimental parameters should remain consistent, so the MScanFit MUNE will not be compromised by non-physiological factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9621390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96213902022-11-01 MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters Zong, Ya Lu, Zhiyuan Xu, Peipei Chen, Maoqi Deng, Lianfu Li, Sheng Zhang, Yingchun Xie, Qing Zhou, Ping Front Aging Neurosci Neuroscience MScanFit motor unit number estimation (MUNE) based on the recording of the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) scan has wide applications. This study evaluated the effect of different CMAP scan settings on MScanFit MUNE. CMAP scan of the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) muscle was performed in 10 healthy subjects at a United States (US) research center using different stimulus pulse widths (0.1, 0.2 ms) and total number of stimuli or steps (500, 1,000), and in 12 healthy subjects at a China research center using a 0.1 ms pulse width and 500 steps. MScanFit MUNE was derived using the default model parameters. A significantly higher MUNE was obtained using the shorter than longer pulse width; 84.70 ± 21.56 (500 steps) and 77.90 ± 27.62 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.1 ms vs. 67.60 ± 18.72 (500 steps) and 62.20 ± 15.82 (1,000 steps) at a pulse width of 0.2 ms (p < 0.05). However, MUNE was unrelated to the number of steps (500 vs. 1,000, p > 0.1). MUNE was significantly higher in persons studied in the China center (136.42 ± 32.46) than the US center (84.70 ± 21.56) despite each center using the same pulse widths and steps (p < 0.001). After excluding the ethnicity, age and experimenter factors, this significant difference is speculated to be partly related to different electrode size used in the two centers. The findings suggest that CMAP scan experimental parameters should remain consistent, so the MScanFit MUNE will not be compromised by non-physiological factors. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9621390/ /pubmed/36325193 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zong, Lu, Xu, Chen, Deng, Li, Zhang, Xie and Zhou. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zong, Ya
Lu, Zhiyuan
Xu, Peipei
Chen, Maoqi
Deng, Lianfu
Li, Sheng
Zhang, Yingchun
Xie, Qing
Zhou, Ping
MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title_full MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title_fullStr MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title_full_unstemmed MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title_short MScanFit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: Findings from different experimental parameters
title_sort mscanfit motor unit number estimation of abductor pollicis brevis: findings from different experimental parameters
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36325193
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.953173
work_keys_str_mv AT zongya mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT luzhiyuan mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT xupeipei mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT chenmaoqi mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT denglianfu mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT lisheng mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT zhangyingchun mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT xieqing mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters
AT zhouping mscanfitmotorunitnumberestimationofabductorpollicisbrevisfindingsfromdifferentexperimentalparameters