Cargando…
Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patient...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094 |
_version_ | 1784821540089495552 |
---|---|
author | Älgå, Andreas Malmstedt, Jonas Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari |
author_facet | Älgå, Andreas Malmstedt, Jonas Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari |
author_sort | Älgå, Andreas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. METHODS: We used data from a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure wound therapy with standard treatment of civilian adults with acute extremity blast or gunshot wounds. We evaluated the reliability (internal consistency, stability) and validity of the body subscale of the Wound QoL instrument using the World Health Organisation 20 question self-reporting questionnaire as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants were included in the study. The participants were predominantly (93.4%) male, and median age was 29.0 years (IQR 21.0–34.0). The internal consistency was acceptable while a test-retest analysis indicated instability in the Wound QoL instrument. The content validity of the instrument was considered satisfactory; however, the criterion validity was found to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Wound QoL is a promising instrument for the assessment of wound specific HRQoL among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. Further testing and validation is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9621402 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96214022022-11-01 Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument Älgå, Andreas Malmstedt, Jonas Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. METHODS: We used data from a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure wound therapy with standard treatment of civilian adults with acute extremity blast or gunshot wounds. We evaluated the reliability (internal consistency, stability) and validity of the body subscale of the Wound QoL instrument using the World Health Organisation 20 question self-reporting questionnaire as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants were included in the study. The participants were predominantly (93.4%) male, and median age was 29.0 years (IQR 21.0–34.0). The internal consistency was acceptable while a test-retest analysis indicated instability in the Wound QoL instrument. The content validity of the instrument was considered satisfactory; however, the criterion validity was found to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Wound QoL is a promising instrument for the assessment of wound specific HRQoL among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. Further testing and validation is needed. Public Library of Science 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9621402/ /pubmed/36315560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094 Text en © 2022 Älgå et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Älgå, Andreas Malmstedt, Jonas Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title | Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title_full | Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title_fullStr | Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title_full_unstemmed | Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title_short | Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument |
title_sort | wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: validation of the wound qol instrument |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621402/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT algaandreas woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument AT malmstedtjonas woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument AT fagerdahlannmari woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument |