Cargando…

Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument

BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Älgå, Andreas, Malmstedt, Jonas, Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094
_version_ 1784821540089495552
author Älgå, Andreas
Malmstedt, Jonas
Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari
author_facet Älgå, Andreas
Malmstedt, Jonas
Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari
author_sort Älgå, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. METHODS: We used data from a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure wound therapy with standard treatment of civilian adults with acute extremity blast or gunshot wounds. We evaluated the reliability (internal consistency, stability) and validity of the body subscale of the Wound QoL instrument using the World Health Organisation 20 question self-reporting questionnaire as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants were included in the study. The participants were predominantly (93.4%) male, and median age was 29.0 years (IQR 21.0–34.0). The internal consistency was acceptable while a test-retest analysis indicated instability in the Wound QoL instrument. The content validity of the instrument was considered satisfactory; however, the criterion validity was found to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Wound QoL is a promising instrument for the assessment of wound specific HRQoL among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. Further testing and validation is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9621402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96214022022-11-01 Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument Älgå, Andreas Malmstedt, Jonas Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Acute blast or gunshot wounds have a negative effect on the patients’ health related quality of life (HRQoL). No validated instrument exists to assess the HRQoL of patients with such wounds. Therefore, we aimed to test and validate a subscale of an existing HRQoL instrument among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. METHODS: We used data from a randomized controlled trial comparing negative pressure wound therapy with standard treatment of civilian adults with acute extremity blast or gunshot wounds. We evaluated the reliability (internal consistency, stability) and validity of the body subscale of the Wound QoL instrument using the World Health Organisation 20 question self-reporting questionnaire as gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 152 participants were included in the study. The participants were predominantly (93.4%) male, and median age was 29.0 years (IQR 21.0–34.0). The internal consistency was acceptable while a test-retest analysis indicated instability in the Wound QoL instrument. The content validity of the instrument was considered satisfactory; however, the criterion validity was found to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that Wound QoL is a promising instrument for the assessment of wound specific HRQoL among patients with acute blast or gunshot wounds. Further testing and validation is needed. Public Library of Science 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9621402/ /pubmed/36315560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094 Text en © 2022 Älgå et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Älgå, Andreas
Malmstedt, Jonas
Fagerdahl, Ann-Mari
Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title_full Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title_fullStr Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title_full_unstemmed Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title_short Wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: Validation of the wound QoL instrument
title_sort wound specific quality of life after blast or gunshot injury: validation of the wound qol instrument
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315560
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277094
work_keys_str_mv AT algaandreas woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument
AT malmstedtjonas woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument
AT fagerdahlannmari woundspecificqualityoflifeafterblastorgunshotinjuryvalidationofthewoundqolinstrument