Cargando…
Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
BACKGROUND: Redundancy is an unethical, unscientific, and costly challenge in clinical health research. There is a high risk of redundancy when existing evidence is not used to justify the research question when a new study is initiated. Therefore, the aim of this study was to synthesize meta-resear...
Autores principales: | Andreasen, Jane, Nørgaard, Birgitte, Draborg, Eva, Juhl, Carsten Bogh, Yost, Jennifer, Brunnhuber, Klara, Robinson, Karen A., Lund, Hans |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9621455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36315526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276955 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies
por: Draborg, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Meta-research evaluating redundancy and use of systematic reviews when planning new studies in health research: a scoping review
por: Lund, Hans, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Effectiveness of physical activity monitors in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in the management of inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials
por: Nielsen, Ole Haagen, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Physical activity monitors to enhance amount of physical activity in older adults – a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Larsen, Rasmus Tolstrup, et al.
Publicado: (2019)