Cargando…

Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal

BACKGROUND: Ensuring access to removal services for implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) is essential to realize informed choice and voluntary family planning. We document removal desires and experiences among women who received an implant or IUD from the public sector in 3 districts of Senegal....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brunie, Aurélie, Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr, Ndiaye, Salif, Dioh, Etienne, Lebetkin, Elena, Lydon, Megan M., Knippler, Elizabeth, Brittingham, Sarah, Dabo, Marème, Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Global Health: Science and Practice 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316132
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123
_version_ 1784821730075738112
author Brunie, Aurélie
Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr
Ndiaye, Salif
Dioh, Etienne
Lebetkin, Elena
Lydon, Megan M.
Knippler, Elizabeth
Brittingham, Sarah
Dabo, Marème
Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
author_facet Brunie, Aurélie
Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr
Ndiaye, Salif
Dioh, Etienne
Lebetkin, Elena
Lydon, Megan M.
Knippler, Elizabeth
Brittingham, Sarah
Dabo, Marème
Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
author_sort Brunie, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ensuring access to removal services for implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) is essential to realize informed choice and voluntary family planning. We document removal desires and experiences among women who received an implant or IUD from the public sector in 3 districts of Senegal. METHODS: We conducted a phone survey of 1,868 implant and IUD users, 598 follow-up surveys with those who had ever asked a provider for a removal, and 24 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with women who had ever wanted an implant removal. We analyzed survey data descriptively and IDI data thematically. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of implant users and 54% of IUD users reported having wanted a removal. Desired pregnancy and contraceptive-induced menstrual changes (CIMCs) were the main reasons for removal desires. Fifty-four percent of implant users and 55% of IUD users who asked a provider for a removal reported challenges accessing services, with over two-thirds noting long lines or wait times. Sixty-three percent of implant users and 73% of IUD users who saw a provider were satisfied with the outcome of their first interaction. Over 90% of participants had not been told about the removal cost at insertion. Almost all participants who had their method removed obtained a complete removal during their first clinical procedure. Around two-thirds of participants who obtained a removal did not take up another method at that time. IDIs confirmed the influence of CIMCs on removal desires and show some partner influence is common in removal decision making. Barriers include lack of available qualified providers and supplies. Provider interactions play an important role in satisfaction with removal services. CONCLUSION: Participants’ experiences accessing removal services were generally positive. Areas of potential improvement include client flow, counseling messages at insertion, and when advising clients to keep their method, pricing, and post-removal reinsertion or method switching.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Global Health: Science and Practice
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96222812022-11-14 Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal Brunie, Aurélie Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr Ndiaye, Salif Dioh, Etienne Lebetkin, Elena Lydon, Megan M. Knippler, Elizabeth Brittingham, Sarah Dabo, Marème Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia Glob Health Sci Pract Original Article BACKGROUND: Ensuring access to removal services for implants and intrauterine devices (IUDs) is essential to realize informed choice and voluntary family planning. We document removal desires and experiences among women who received an implant or IUD from the public sector in 3 districts of Senegal. METHODS: We conducted a phone survey of 1,868 implant and IUD users, 598 follow-up surveys with those who had ever asked a provider for a removal, and 24 in-depth interviews (IDIs) with women who had ever wanted an implant removal. We analyzed survey data descriptively and IDI data thematically. RESULTS: Fifty-eight percent of implant users and 54% of IUD users reported having wanted a removal. Desired pregnancy and contraceptive-induced menstrual changes (CIMCs) were the main reasons for removal desires. Fifty-four percent of implant users and 55% of IUD users who asked a provider for a removal reported challenges accessing services, with over two-thirds noting long lines or wait times. Sixty-three percent of implant users and 73% of IUD users who saw a provider were satisfied with the outcome of their first interaction. Over 90% of participants had not been told about the removal cost at insertion. Almost all participants who had their method removed obtained a complete removal during their first clinical procedure. Around two-thirds of participants who obtained a removal did not take up another method at that time. IDIs confirmed the influence of CIMCs on removal desires and show some partner influence is common in removal decision making. Barriers include lack of available qualified providers and supplies. Provider interactions play an important role in satisfaction with removal services. CONCLUSION: Participants’ experiences accessing removal services were generally positive. Areas of potential improvement include client flow, counseling messages at insertion, and when advising clients to keep their method, pricing, and post-removal reinsertion or method switching. Global Health: Science and Practice 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9622281/ /pubmed/36316132 http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123 Text en © Brunie et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123
spellingShingle Original Article
Brunie, Aurélie
Aw, Fatou Ndiaté Rachel Sarr
Ndiaye, Salif
Dioh, Etienne
Lebetkin, Elena
Lydon, Megan M.
Knippler, Elizabeth
Brittingham, Sarah
Dabo, Marème
Ndiaye, Marème Mady Dia
Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title_full Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title_fullStr Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title_full_unstemmed Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title_short Making Removals Part of Informed Choice: A Mixed-Method Study of Client Experiences With Removal of Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives in Senegal
title_sort making removals part of informed choice: a mixed-method study of client experiences with removal of long-acting reversible contraceptives in senegal
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316132
http://dx.doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00123
work_keys_str_mv AT brunieaurelie makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT awfatoundiaterachelsarr makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT ndiayesalif makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT diohetienne makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT lebetkinelena makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT lydonmeganm makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT knipplerelizabeth makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT brittinghamsarah makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT dabomareme makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal
AT ndiayemarememadydia makingremovalspartofinformedchoiceamixedmethodstudyofclientexperienceswithremovaloflongactingreversiblecontraceptivesinsenegal