Cargando…

Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the DFT015 intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision) compared with an aspheric monofocal control IOL (AcrySof IQ model SN60WF). SETTING: 11 investigation sites in the U.S. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical study. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCabe, Cathleen, Berdahl, John, Reiser, Harvey, Newsom, T. Hunter, Cibik, Lisa, Koch, Douglas, Lemp-Hull, Jessie, Jasti, Srichand
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
_version_ 1784821750129754112
author McCabe, Cathleen
Berdahl, John
Reiser, Harvey
Newsom, T. Hunter
Cibik, Lisa
Koch, Douglas
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Jasti, Srichand
author_facet McCabe, Cathleen
Berdahl, John
Reiser, Harvey
Newsom, T. Hunter
Cibik, Lisa
Koch, Douglas
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Jasti, Srichand
author_sort McCabe, Cathleen
collection PubMed
description To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the DFT015 intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision) compared with an aspheric monofocal control IOL (AcrySof IQ model SN60WF). SETTING: 11 investigation sites in the U.S. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical study. METHODS: Patients aged 22 years or older with bilateral cataracts were randomized to receive bilateral implantation of DFT015 or SN60WF. The 4 coprimary effectiveness outcomes (6 months postoperatively) were monocular photopic distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), monocular photopic corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), monocular depth of focus (DoF), and the percentage of patients achieving a DCIVA of 0.2 logMAR or better. The mean monocular photopic distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was a secondary effectiveness outcome. Safety and patient-reported visual disturbances were evaluated through questionnaires. RESULTS: 218 patients (435 eyes) completed the study. Compared with SN60WF, DFT015 demonstrated superior mean monocular photopic DCIVA (P < .001), noninferior mean monocular photopic CDVA, and superior mean monocular photopic DCNVA (P < .001) and provided an extended monocular DoF (increase of 0.54 diopters at 0.2 logMAR). With DFT015, 78 first eyes (72.9%) achieved a DCIVA of 0.2 logMAR or better at 6 months. Incidences of ocular serious adverse events and patient-reported most bothersome visual disturbances were low and consistent between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DFT015 is safe and effective for the visual correction of aphakia, exceeding American National Standards Institute criteria for an extended depth-of-focus IOL by providing superior DCIVA and DCNVA, with comparable CDVA and visual disturbances to the SN60WF monofocal IOL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96223642022-11-04 Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design McCabe, Cathleen Berdahl, John Reiser, Harvey Newsom, T. Hunter Cibik, Lisa Koch, Douglas Lemp-Hull, Jessie Jasti, Srichand J Cataract Refract Surg Article To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the DFT015 intraocular lens (IOL) (AcrySof IQ Vivity Extended Vision) compared with an aspheric monofocal control IOL (AcrySof IQ model SN60WF). SETTING: 11 investigation sites in the U.S. DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled clinical study. METHODS: Patients aged 22 years or older with bilateral cataracts were randomized to receive bilateral implantation of DFT015 or SN60WF. The 4 coprimary effectiveness outcomes (6 months postoperatively) were monocular photopic distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), monocular photopic corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), monocular depth of focus (DoF), and the percentage of patients achieving a DCIVA of 0.2 logMAR or better. The mean monocular photopic distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was a secondary effectiveness outcome. Safety and patient-reported visual disturbances were evaluated through questionnaires. RESULTS: 218 patients (435 eyes) completed the study. Compared with SN60WF, DFT015 demonstrated superior mean monocular photopic DCIVA (P < .001), noninferior mean monocular photopic CDVA, and superior mean monocular photopic DCNVA (P < .001) and provided an extended monocular DoF (increase of 0.54 diopters at 0.2 logMAR). With DFT015, 78 first eyes (72.9%) achieved a DCIVA of 0.2 logMAR or better at 6 months. Incidences of ocular serious adverse events and patient-reported most bothersome visual disturbances were low and consistent between groups. CONCLUSIONS: DFT015 is safe and effective for the visual correction of aphakia, exceeding American National Standards Institute criteria for an extended depth-of-focus IOL by providing superior DCIVA and DCNVA, with comparable CDVA and visual disturbances to the SN60WF monofocal IOL. Wolters Kluwer 2022-11 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9622364/ /pubmed/35616507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
McCabe, Cathleen
Berdahl, John
Reiser, Harvey
Newsom, T. Hunter
Cibik, Lisa
Koch, Douglas
Lemp-Hull, Jessie
Jasti, Srichand
Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title_full Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title_short Clinical outcomes in a U.S. registration study of a new EDOF intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
title_sort clinical outcomes in a u.s. registration study of a new edof intraocular lens with a nondiffractive design
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35616507
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000978
work_keys_str_mv AT mccabecathleen clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT berdahljohn clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT reiserharvey clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT newsomthunter clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT cibiklisa clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT kochdouglas clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT lemphulljessie clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign
AT jastisrichand clinicaloutcomesinausregistrationstudyofanewedofintraocularlenswithanondiffractivedesign