Cargando…

Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medical cannabis is becoming an acceptable treatment modality in medicine, especially for pain relief. Concurrently, cannabis use is becoming more prevalent worldwide, a public demand-driven trend despite the lack of established scientific basis. This observational open-lab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robinson, Dror, Ritter, Sivan, Yassin, Mustafa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Rambam Health Care Campus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394500
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10485
_version_ 1784821757998268416
author Robinson, Dror
Ritter, Sivan
Yassin, Mustafa
author_facet Robinson, Dror
Ritter, Sivan
Yassin, Mustafa
author_sort Robinson, Dror
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medical cannabis is becoming an acceptable treatment modality in medicine, especially for pain relief. Concurrently, cannabis use is becoming more prevalent worldwide, a public demand-driven trend despite the lack of established scientific basis. This observational open-label study sought to investigate the effectiveness of cannabis therapy for alleviating low back pain symptoms. METHODS: Two types of cannabis treatment modalities were sequentially administered to chronic low back pain patients. After an initial 1-month washout period (WO1), the first modality was cannabidiol (CBD)-rich sublingual extract treatment administered for 10 months. Following another washout period, the second modality, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-rich smoked inflorescence (whole dried cannabis flowers) was administered for 12 months. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 24 patients whose advanced imaging studies (i.e. computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine) revealed disc herniation or spinal stenosis. Three patients dropped out of extract therapy treatment but resumed study participation to receive THC-rich smoking therapy. After a minimum of 2 years, cannabis therapy had reduced lower back pain symptoms, as assessed by Oswestry Disability Index, the SF-12 patient-reported outcome questionnaire, and the visual analogue scale. Pain reduction was not significant during the extract treatment part of the study; however, pain reduction was significant during the inhaled therapy part of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that inhaled THC-rich therapy is more effective than CBD-rich sublingual extract therapy for treating low back pain and that cannabis therapy is safe and effective for chronic low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Rambam Health Care Campus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96223932022-11-04 Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study Robinson, Dror Ritter, Sivan Yassin, Mustafa Rambam Maimonides Med J Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Medical cannabis is becoming an acceptable treatment modality in medicine, especially for pain relief. Concurrently, cannabis use is becoming more prevalent worldwide, a public demand-driven trend despite the lack of established scientific basis. This observational open-label study sought to investigate the effectiveness of cannabis therapy for alleviating low back pain symptoms. METHODS: Two types of cannabis treatment modalities were sequentially administered to chronic low back pain patients. After an initial 1-month washout period (WO1), the first modality was cannabidiol (CBD)-rich sublingual extract treatment administered for 10 months. Following another washout period, the second modality, Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-rich smoked inflorescence (whole dried cannabis flowers) was administered for 12 months. RESULTS: Enrolled in the study were 24 patients whose advanced imaging studies (i.e. computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine) revealed disc herniation or spinal stenosis. Three patients dropped out of extract therapy treatment but resumed study participation to receive THC-rich smoking therapy. After a minimum of 2 years, cannabis therapy had reduced lower back pain symptoms, as assessed by Oswestry Disability Index, the SF-12 patient-reported outcome questionnaire, and the visual analogue scale. Pain reduction was not significant during the extract treatment part of the study; however, pain reduction was significant during the inhaled therapy part of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that inhaled THC-rich therapy is more effective than CBD-rich sublingual extract therapy for treating low back pain and that cannabis therapy is safe and effective for chronic low back pain. Rambam Health Care Campus 2022-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9622393/ /pubmed/36394500 http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10485 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Robinson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Robinson, Dror
Ritter, Sivan
Yassin, Mustafa
Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title_full Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title_fullStr Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title_short Comparing Sublingual and Inhaled Cannabis Therapies for Low Back Pain: An Observational Open-Label Study
title_sort comparing sublingual and inhaled cannabis therapies for low back pain: an observational open-label study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36394500
http://dx.doi.org/10.5041/RMMJ.10485
work_keys_str_mv AT robinsondror comparingsublingualandinhaledcannabistherapiesforlowbackpainanobservationalopenlabelstudy
AT rittersivan comparingsublingualandinhaledcannabistherapiesforlowbackpainanobservationalopenlabelstudy
AT yassinmustafa comparingsublingualandinhaledcannabistherapiesforlowbackpainanobservationalopenlabelstudy