Cargando…

Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats

BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of using shear wave dispersion (SWD) imaging to evaluate hepatic acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in a rat model. METHODS: To establish an aGVHD model, 30 Wistar rats were subjected to bone marrow transplantation, 10 Fischer 344 rats were used as don...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xiong, Yu, Xin, Yuwei, Liu, Feifei, Li, Wenxue, Liu, Yiqun, Zhu, Jia’an
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330177
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-374
_version_ 1784821770194255872
author Xiong, Yu
Xin, Yuwei
Liu, Feifei
Li, Wenxue
Liu, Yiqun
Zhu, Jia’an
author_facet Xiong, Yu
Xin, Yuwei
Liu, Feifei
Li, Wenxue
Liu, Yiqun
Zhu, Jia’an
author_sort Xiong, Yu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of using shear wave dispersion (SWD) imaging to evaluate hepatic acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in a rat model. METHODS: To establish an aGVHD model, 30 Wistar rats were subjected to bone marrow transplantation, 10 Fischer 344 rats were used as donors, and 6 Wistar rats were used as the control group. Each week, 6 rats were randomly chosen and divided into groups of 1 week (1 w) to 5 weeks (5 w). For each subgroup, the rats received a clinical index assessment and shear wave dispersion (SWD) examination with 2 quantitative values, shear wave (SW) speed and SWD slope. The histological characteristics were then used as the reference standard to divide the rats into the aGVHD group and the no aGVHD (nGVHD) group. RESULTS: In the 2 weeks (2 w) group, only SWD slope [median: 7.26, interquartile range (IQR): 7.04 to 7.31] showed a significant increase in the measured value (P<0.05). The value of the 3 weeks (3 w) group (median: 7.88, IQR: 7.84 to 8.49) significantly increased compared with the 2 w value (P<0.05). Although the value increased gradually from week 3 to week 5, it had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The SW speed [mean ± standard deviation (SD): 1.54±0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 1.59] and SWD slope (mean ± SD: 8.29±0.56, 95% CI: 7.99 to 8.59) of the aGVHD group were higher than those of the control group and the nGVHD group (P<0.001). The correlation of SWD slope with pathological grade was the highest (r=0.798, P<0.01), followed by SW speed (r=0.785, P<0.01), and the correlation of clinical index with pathological grade was the lowest (r=0.751, P<0.01). In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) value of aGVHD using the SWD slope was 0.844 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.95, sensitivity: 93.75%, specificity: 78.57%), which was higher than the AUC of both SW speed and clinical index, and the difference was statistically significant compared to the AUC of the clinical index. CONCLUSIONS: The SWD slope could show significant abnormalities earlier than SW speed and clinical index and is also more consistent with the change in aGVHD severity level. The SWD slope may help in detecting hepatic aGVHD during ultrasound SWD examination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96224462022-11-02 Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats Xiong, Yu Xin, Yuwei Liu, Feifei Li, Wenxue Liu, Yiqun Zhu, Jia’an Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: To investigate the feasibility of using shear wave dispersion (SWD) imaging to evaluate hepatic acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in a rat model. METHODS: To establish an aGVHD model, 30 Wistar rats were subjected to bone marrow transplantation, 10 Fischer 344 rats were used as donors, and 6 Wistar rats were used as the control group. Each week, 6 rats were randomly chosen and divided into groups of 1 week (1 w) to 5 weeks (5 w). For each subgroup, the rats received a clinical index assessment and shear wave dispersion (SWD) examination with 2 quantitative values, shear wave (SW) speed and SWD slope. The histological characteristics were then used as the reference standard to divide the rats into the aGVHD group and the no aGVHD (nGVHD) group. RESULTS: In the 2 weeks (2 w) group, only SWD slope [median: 7.26, interquartile range (IQR): 7.04 to 7.31] showed a significant increase in the measured value (P<0.05). The value of the 3 weeks (3 w) group (median: 7.88, IQR: 7.84 to 8.49) significantly increased compared with the 2 w value (P<0.05). Although the value increased gradually from week 3 to week 5, it had no statistical significance (P>0.05). The SW speed [mean ± standard deviation (SD): 1.54±0.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.48 to 1.59] and SWD slope (mean ± SD: 8.29±0.56, 95% CI: 7.99 to 8.59) of the aGVHD group were higher than those of the control group and the nGVHD group (P<0.001). The correlation of SWD slope with pathological grade was the highest (r=0.798, P<0.01), followed by SW speed (r=0.785, P<0.01), and the correlation of clinical index with pathological grade was the lowest (r=0.751, P<0.01). In addition, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) value of aGVHD using the SWD slope was 0.844 (95% CI: 0.67 to 0.95, sensitivity: 93.75%, specificity: 78.57%), which was higher than the AUC of both SW speed and clinical index, and the difference was statistically significant compared to the AUC of the clinical index. CONCLUSIONS: The SWD slope could show significant abnormalities earlier than SW speed and clinical index and is also more consistent with the change in aGVHD severity level. The SWD slope may help in detecting hepatic aGVHD during ultrasound SWD examination. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9622446/ /pubmed/36330177 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-374 Text en 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Xiong, Yu
Xin, Yuwei
Liu, Feifei
Li, Wenxue
Liu, Yiqun
Zhu, Jia’an
Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title_full Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title_fullStr Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title_short Efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
title_sort efficacy of shear wave dispersion imaging for viscoelastic assessment of the liver in acute graft-versus-host disease rats
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330177
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-374
work_keys_str_mv AT xiongyu efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats
AT xinyuwei efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats
AT liufeifei efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats
AT liwenxue efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats
AT liuyiqun efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats
AT zhujiaan efficacyofshearwavedispersionimagingforviscoelasticassessmentoftheliverinacutegraftversushostdiseaserats