Cargando…

Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study

Arm positions employed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can affect magnetic field distribution, which may result in variability in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of arm position on lumbar PDFF measured using chemical-shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hayashi, Tatsuya, Yano, Shimpei, Shibukawa, Shuhei, Kojima, Shinya, Ito, Toshimune, Oba, Hiroshi, Kondo, Hiroshi, Yamamoto, Asako, Okamoto, Takahide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330194
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-396
_version_ 1784821770458497024
author Hayashi, Tatsuya
Yano, Shimpei
Shibukawa, Shuhei
Kojima, Shinya
Ito, Toshimune
Oba, Hiroshi
Kondo, Hiroshi
Yamamoto, Asako
Okamoto, Takahide
author_facet Hayashi, Tatsuya
Yano, Shimpei
Shibukawa, Shuhei
Kojima, Shinya
Ito, Toshimune
Oba, Hiroshi
Kondo, Hiroshi
Yamamoto, Asako
Okamoto, Takahide
author_sort Hayashi, Tatsuya
collection PubMed
description Arm positions employed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can affect magnetic field distribution, which may result in variability in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of arm position on lumbar PDFF measured using chemical-shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI). Fifteen healthy volunteers from a single-center underwent lumbar CSE-MRI at two different arm positions (side and elevated) using a single 3T scanner. Scans were performed twice in each position. PDFFs of the L1–L5 vertebrae were independently measured by two readers, and reader measurements were compared by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We compared PDFF measurements from two arm positions and from two consecutive scans using the Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis. Measurements from the two readers were in high agreement [ICC =0.999; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.998–0.999]. No significant difference was observed between PDFFs from the first and second scans of all vertebrae for each reader (all P>0.05); however, PDFF for the elevated arm position was significantly higher than that for the side arm position (37.9–44.8% vs. 37.0–43.8%; all P<0.05), except at the L2 level by reader 2. The mean differences in PDFF measurements from the first and second scans [0.1%; 95% limits of agreement (LoA), −1.8% to 1.9%] and from the side arm and elevated arm positions (0.8%; 95% LoA, −1.6% to 3.2%) were small. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that different arm positions during CSE-MRI can slightly affect lumbar PDFF; however, the mean absolute differences were very small.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96224472022-11-02 Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study Hayashi, Tatsuya Yano, Shimpei Shibukawa, Shuhei Kojima, Shinya Ito, Toshimune Oba, Hiroshi Kondo, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Asako Okamoto, Takahide Quant Imaging Med Surg Brief Report Arm positions employed during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can affect magnetic field distribution, which may result in variability in proton density fat fraction (PDFF) measurements. This study evaluated the effect of arm position on lumbar PDFF measured using chemical-shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI). Fifteen healthy volunteers from a single-center underwent lumbar CSE-MRI at two different arm positions (side and elevated) using a single 3T scanner. Scans were performed twice in each position. PDFFs of the L1–L5 vertebrae were independently measured by two readers, and reader measurements were compared by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). We compared PDFF measurements from two arm positions and from two consecutive scans using the Wilcoxon test and Bland-Altman analysis. Measurements from the two readers were in high agreement [ICC =0.999; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.998–0.999]. No significant difference was observed between PDFFs from the first and second scans of all vertebrae for each reader (all P>0.05); however, PDFF for the elevated arm position was significantly higher than that for the side arm position (37.9–44.8% vs. 37.0–43.8%; all P<0.05), except at the L2 level by reader 2. The mean differences in PDFF measurements from the first and second scans [0.1%; 95% limits of agreement (LoA), −1.8% to 1.9%] and from the side arm and elevated arm positions (0.8%; 95% LoA, −1.6% to 3.2%) were small. In conclusion, these preliminary data suggest that different arm positions during CSE-MRI can slightly affect lumbar PDFF; however, the mean absolute differences were very small. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9622447/ /pubmed/36330194 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-396 Text en 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Brief Report
Hayashi, Tatsuya
Yano, Shimpei
Shibukawa, Shuhei
Kojima, Shinya
Ito, Toshimune
Oba, Hiroshi
Kondo, Hiroshi
Yamamoto, Asako
Okamoto, Takahide
Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title_full Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title_fullStr Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title_short Impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
title_sort impact of arm position on vertebral bone marrow proton density fat fraction in chemical-shift-encoded magnetic resonance imaging: a preliminary study
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330194
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-396
work_keys_str_mv AT hayashitatsuya impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT yanoshimpei impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT shibukawashuhei impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT kojimashinya impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT itotoshimune impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT obahiroshi impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT kondohiroshi impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT yamamotoasako impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy
AT okamototakahide impactofarmpositiononvertebralbonemarrowprotondensityfatfractioninchemicalshiftencodedmagneticresonanceimagingapreliminarystudy