Cargando…

The role of paraspinal muscle degeneration in coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative scoliosis

BACKGROUND: Coronal imbalance in degenerative scoliosis is common and is highly correlated with health-related quality of life. Paraspinal muscle is critical to spine stability, but little is known about its contribution to coronal imbalance in degenerative scoliosis. This study aims to investigate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiram, Abdukahar, Hu, Zongshan, Man, Gene Chi-Wai, Ma, Hongru, Li, Jie, Xu, Yanjie, Qian, Zhikai, Zhu, Zezhang, Liu, Zhen, Qiu, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330189
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-222
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Coronal imbalance in degenerative scoliosis is common and is highly correlated with health-related quality of life. Paraspinal muscle is critical to spine stability, but little is known about its contribution to coronal imbalance in degenerative scoliosis. This study aims to investigate the relationship between paraspinal muscle (PSM) degeneration and coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative scoliosis (DS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. A total of 117 patients with DS were retrospectively reviewed. Parameters of PSM (bilateral cross-sectional area, CSA; fat infiltration rate, FI%) at the apical disc and adjacent levels were quantitatively evaluated using MRI. Standing whole-spine radiograph was used to evaluate the coronal (Cobb angle, CA; coronal balance distance, CBD) and sagittal (thoracic kyphosis, TK; lumbar lordosis, LL; sagittal vertical axis, SVA) parameters. Patients were divided into 3 groups: coronal balanced (Type A), coronal imbalanced shifting to concavity (Type B), and coronal imbalanced shifting to convexity (Type C). RESULTS: Based on our criteria, 56 patients were assigned to Type A, 34 patients to Type B, and 27 patients to Type C. There was no significant difference on the sagittal profiles and CSA between the groups. However, Type A showed significantly lower FI% than Type B and Type C on both concavity and convexity (Concave side: Type A vs. Type B vs. Type C, 30.8±8.1 vs. 45.1±7.7 vs. 38.7±12.5, P=0.001; Convex side: Type A vs. Type B vs. Type C, 32.6±10.9 vs. 46.3±7.3 vs. 40.7±11.8, P=0.004). Specifically, Cobb angle was negatively correlated with CSA, mainly at convexity (R=−0.415, P=0.008). Similarly, the increase of CBD significantly correlated with FI% at concavity (R=0.491, P=0.001) and convexity (R=0.354, P=0.025). CONCLUSIONS: DS patients with coronal imbalance demonstrated a worse PSM degeneration when compared with those without coronal imbalance. Besides, PSM degeneration strongly correlated with coronal imbalance, which implies that PSM degeneration may contribute to the coronal imbalance in patients with DS.