Cargando…

Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach

BACKGROUND: Accurate grading of gliomas is a challenge in imaging diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach based on multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating low- and high-grade adult gliomas. METHODS: A model was developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Junqi, Ren, Yan, Zhao, Xueying, Wang, Xiaoqing, Yu, Xuchen, Yao, Zhenwei, Zhou, Yan, Feng, Xiaoyuan, Zhou, Xiaohong Joe, Wang, He
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330178
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-145
_version_ 1784821772921602048
author Xu, Junqi
Ren, Yan
Zhao, Xueying
Wang, Xiaoqing
Yu, Xuchen
Yao, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yan
Feng, Xiaoyuan
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
Wang, He
author_facet Xu, Junqi
Ren, Yan
Zhao, Xueying
Wang, Xiaoqing
Yu, Xuchen
Yao, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yan
Feng, Xiaoyuan
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
Wang, He
author_sort Xu, Junqi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate grading of gliomas is a challenge in imaging diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach based on multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating low- and high-grade adult gliomas. METHODS: A model was developed from an initial cohort containing 74 patients with pathology-confirmed gliomas, who underwent 3 tesla (3T) diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 21 b values. In all, 112 histogram features were extracted from 16 parameters derived from seven diffusion models [monoexponential, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), fractional order calculus (FROC), continuous-time random walk (CTRW), stretched-exponential, and statistical]. Feature selection and model training were performed using five randomly permuted five-fold cross-validations. An internal test set (15 cases of the primary dataset) and an external cohort (n=55) imaged on a different scanner were used to validate the model. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with that of a single DWI model and DWI radiomics using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Seven significant multiparametric DWI features (two from the stretched-exponential and FROC models, and three from the CTRW model) were selected to construct the model. The multiparametric DWI model achieved the highest AUC (0.84, versus 0.71 for the single DWI model, P<0.05), an accuracy of 0.80 in the internal test, and both AUC and accuracy of 0.76 in the external test. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiparametric DWI model differentiated low- (LGG) from high-grade glioma (HGG) with better generalization performance than the established single DWI model. This result suggests that the application of an ML approach with multiple DWI models is feasible for the preoperative grading of gliomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96224572022-11-02 Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach Xu, Junqi Ren, Yan Zhao, Xueying Wang, Xiaoqing Yu, Xuchen Yao, Zhenwei Zhou, Yan Feng, Xiaoyuan Zhou, Xiaohong Joe Wang, He Quant Imaging Med Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Accurate grading of gliomas is a challenge in imaging diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a machine learning (ML) approach based on multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentiating low- and high-grade adult gliomas. METHODS: A model was developed from an initial cohort containing 74 patients with pathology-confirmed gliomas, who underwent 3 tesla (3T) diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 21 b values. In all, 112 histogram features were extracted from 16 parameters derived from seven diffusion models [monoexponential, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), fractional order calculus (FROC), continuous-time random walk (CTRW), stretched-exponential, and statistical]. Feature selection and model training were performed using five randomly permuted five-fold cross-validations. An internal test set (15 cases of the primary dataset) and an external cohort (n=55) imaged on a different scanner were used to validate the model. The diagnostic performance of the model was compared with that of a single DWI model and DWI radiomics using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Seven significant multiparametric DWI features (two from the stretched-exponential and FROC models, and three from the CTRW model) were selected to construct the model. The multiparametric DWI model achieved the highest AUC (0.84, versus 0.71 for the single DWI model, P<0.05), an accuracy of 0.80 in the internal test, and both AUC and accuracy of 0.76 in the external test. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiparametric DWI model differentiated low- (LGG) from high-grade glioma (HGG) with better generalization performance than the established single DWI model. This result suggests that the application of an ML approach with multiple DWI models is feasible for the preoperative grading of gliomas. AME Publishing Company 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9622457/ /pubmed/36330178 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-145 Text en 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Xu, Junqi
Ren, Yan
Zhao, Xueying
Wang, Xiaoqing
Yu, Xuchen
Yao, Zhenwei
Zhou, Yan
Feng, Xiaoyuan
Zhou, Xiaohong Joe
Wang, He
Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title_full Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title_fullStr Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title_short Incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
title_sort incorporating multiple magnetic resonance diffusion models to differentiate low- and high-grade adult gliomas: a machine learning approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330178
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/qims-22-145
work_keys_str_mv AT xujunqi incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT renyan incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT zhaoxueying incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT wangxiaoqing incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT yuxuchen incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT yaozhenwei incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT zhouyan incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT fengxiaoyuan incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT zhouxiaohongjoe incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach
AT wanghe incorporatingmultiplemagneticresonancediffusionmodelstodifferentiatelowandhighgradeadultgliomasamachinelearningapproach