Cargando…

The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task

Error detection and error significance form essential mechanisms that influence error processing and action adaptation. Error detection often is assessed by an immediate self-evaluation of accuracy. Our study used cognitive neuroscience methods to elucidate whether self-evaluation itself influences...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Porth, Elisa, Mattes, André, Stahl, Jutta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6
_version_ 1784821792478593024
author Porth, Elisa
Mattes, André
Stahl, Jutta
author_facet Porth, Elisa
Mattes, André
Stahl, Jutta
author_sort Porth, Elisa
collection PubMed
description Error detection and error significance form essential mechanisms that influence error processing and action adaptation. Error detection often is assessed by an immediate self-evaluation of accuracy. Our study used cognitive neuroscience methods to elucidate whether self-evaluation itself influences error processing by increasing error significance in the context of a complex response selection process. In a novel eight-alternative response task, our participants responded to eight symbol stimuli with eight different response keys and a specific stimulus-response assignment. In the first part of the experiment, the participants merely performed the task. In the second part, they also evaluated their response accuracy on each trial. We replicated variations in early and later stages of error processing and action adaptation as a function of error detection. The additional self-evaluation enhanced error processing on later stages, probably reflecting error evidence accumulation, whereas earlier error monitoring processes were not amplified. Implementing multivariate pattern analysis revealed that self-evaluation influenced brain activity patterns preceding and following the response onset, independent of response accuracy. The classifier successfully differentiated between responses from the self- and the no-self-evaluation condition several hundred milliseconds before response onset. Subsequent exploratory analyses indicated that both self-evaluation and the time on task contributed to these differences in brain activity patterns. This suggests that in addition to its effect on error processing, self-evaluation in a complex choice task seems to have an influence on early and general processing mechanisms (e.g., the quality of attention and stimulus encoding), which is amplified by the time on task. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96225362022-11-02 The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task Porth, Elisa Mattes, André Stahl, Jutta Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Research Article Error detection and error significance form essential mechanisms that influence error processing and action adaptation. Error detection often is assessed by an immediate self-evaluation of accuracy. Our study used cognitive neuroscience methods to elucidate whether self-evaluation itself influences error processing by increasing error significance in the context of a complex response selection process. In a novel eight-alternative response task, our participants responded to eight symbol stimuli with eight different response keys and a specific stimulus-response assignment. In the first part of the experiment, the participants merely performed the task. In the second part, they also evaluated their response accuracy on each trial. We replicated variations in early and later stages of error processing and action adaptation as a function of error detection. The additional self-evaluation enhanced error processing on later stages, probably reflecting error evidence accumulation, whereas earlier error monitoring processes were not amplified. Implementing multivariate pattern analysis revealed that self-evaluation influenced brain activity patterns preceding and following the response onset, independent of response accuracy. The classifier successfully differentiated between responses from the self- and the no-self-evaluation condition several hundred milliseconds before response onset. Subsequent exploratory analyses indicated that both self-evaluation and the time on task contributed to these differences in brain activity patterns. This suggests that in addition to its effect on error processing, self-evaluation in a complex choice task seems to have an influence on early and general processing mechanisms (e.g., the quality of attention and stimulus encoding), which is amplified by the time on task. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6. Springer US 2022-08-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9622536/ /pubmed/35915335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Porth, Elisa
Mattes, André
Stahl, Jutta
The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title_full The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title_fullStr The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title_full_unstemmed The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title_short The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
title_sort influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35915335
http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13415-022-01028-6
work_keys_str_mv AT porthelisa theinfluenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask
AT mattesandre theinfluenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask
AT stahljutta theinfluenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask
AT porthelisa influenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask
AT mattesandre influenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask
AT stahljutta influenceoferrordetectionanderrorsignificanceonneuralandbehavioralcorrelatesoferrorprocessinginacomplexchoicetask