Cargando…
Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02911 |
_version_ | 1784821822191042560 |
---|---|
author | Miyauchi, Eisaku Morita, Satoshi Nakamura, Atsushi Hosomi, Yukio Watanabe, Kana Ikeda, Satoshi Seike, Masahiro Fujita, Yuka Minato, Koichi Ko, Ryo Harada, Toshiyuki Hagiwara, Koichi Kobayashi, Kunihiko Nukiwa, Toshihiro Inoue, Akira |
author_facet | Miyauchi, Eisaku Morita, Satoshi Nakamura, Atsushi Hosomi, Yukio Watanabe, Kana Ikeda, Satoshi Seike, Masahiro Fujita, Yuka Minato, Koichi Ko, Ryo Harada, Toshiyuki Hagiwara, Koichi Kobayashi, Kunihiko Nukiwa, Toshihiro Inoue, Akira |
author_sort | Miyauchi, Eisaku |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non–small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9622660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96226602022-11-01 Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR Miyauchi, Eisaku Morita, Satoshi Nakamura, Atsushi Hosomi, Yukio Watanabe, Kana Ikeda, Satoshi Seike, Masahiro Fujita, Yuka Minato, Koichi Ko, Ryo Harada, Toshiyuki Hagiwara, Koichi Kobayashi, Kunihiko Nukiwa, Toshihiro Inoue, Akira J Clin Oncol CLINICAL TRIAL UPDATES Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. In a randomized, open-label, phase III NEJ009 study, gefitinib plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with gefitinib-alone in patients with untreated non–small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor. Herein, we report the updated survival outcome and long-term tolerability. Patients were randomly assigned to gefitinib (gefitinib 250 mg orally, once daily) and gefitinib combined with carboplatin plus pemetrexed (GCP in a 3-week cycle for six cycles followed by concurrent gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance) groups. At the data cutoff (May 22, 2020), GCP demonstrated significantly better PFS2 (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.97; P = .027) than gefitinib. However, the updated median OS was 38.5 months (95% CI, 31.1 to 47.1) and 49.0 months (95% CI, 41.8 to 56.7) in the gefitinib and GCP groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.06; P = .127). The OS in both groups was similar for the overall patient population. No severe adverse events occurred since the first report. This updated analysis revealed that the GCP regimen improved PFS and PFS2 with an acceptable safety profile compared with gefitinib-alone. GCP is more efficient than gefitinib monotherapy as a first-line treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-11-01 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9622660/ /pubmed/35960896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02911 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | CLINICAL TRIAL UPDATES Miyauchi, Eisaku Morita, Satoshi Nakamura, Atsushi Hosomi, Yukio Watanabe, Kana Ikeda, Satoshi Seike, Masahiro Fujita, Yuka Minato, Koichi Ko, Ryo Harada, Toshiyuki Hagiwara, Koichi Kobayashi, Kunihiko Nukiwa, Toshihiro Inoue, Akira Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title | Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title_full | Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title_fullStr | Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title_full_unstemmed | Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title_short | Updated Analysis of NEJ009: Gefitinib-Alone Versus Gefitinib Plus Chemotherapy for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Mutated EGFR |
title_sort | updated analysis of nej009: gefitinib-alone versus gefitinib plus chemotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer with mutated egfr |
topic | CLINICAL TRIAL UPDATES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35960896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyauchieisaku updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT moritasatoshi updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT nakamuraatsushi updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT hosomiyukio updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT watanabekana updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT ikedasatoshi updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT seikemasahiro updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT fujitayuka updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT minatokoichi updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT koryo updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT haradatoshiyuki updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT hagiwarakoichi updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT kobayashikunihiko updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT nukiwatoshihiro updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr AT inoueakira updatedanalysisofnej009gefitinibaloneversusgefitinibpluschemotherapyfornonsmallcelllungcancerwithmutatedegfr |