Cargando…

Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions

Tobacco bacterial wilt has seriously affected tobacco production. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) induced tobacco bacterial wilt resistant mutants are important for the control of tobacco bacterial wilt. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to study the rhizosphere bacterial community assembl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Haoqi, Xu, Peiwen, Wu, Shengxin, Yu, Wen, Cheng, Yazhi, Chen, Zhihua, Yang, Xingyou, Yu, Xiangwen, Li, Bingjie, Ding, Anming, Wang, Weifeng, Sun, Yuhe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20293-6
_version_ 1784821867025006592
author Shi, Haoqi
Xu, Peiwen
Wu, Shengxin
Yu, Wen
Cheng, Yazhi
Chen, Zhihua
Yang, Xingyou
Yu, Xiangwen
Li, Bingjie
Ding, Anming
Wang, Weifeng
Sun, Yuhe
author_facet Shi, Haoqi
Xu, Peiwen
Wu, Shengxin
Yu, Wen
Cheng, Yazhi
Chen, Zhihua
Yang, Xingyou
Yu, Xiangwen
Li, Bingjie
Ding, Anming
Wang, Weifeng
Sun, Yuhe
author_sort Shi, Haoqi
collection PubMed
description Tobacco bacterial wilt has seriously affected tobacco production. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) induced tobacco bacterial wilt resistant mutants are important for the control of tobacco bacterial wilt. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to study the rhizosphere bacterial community assemblages of bacterial wilt resistant mutant tobacco rhizosphere soil (namely KS), bacterial wilt susceptible tobacco rhizosphere soil (namely GS) and bulk soil (namely BS) in Xuancheng, Huanxi, Yibin and Luzhou. Alpha analysis showed that the bacterial community diversity and richness of KS and GS in the four regions were not significantly different. However, analysis of intergroup variation in the top 15 bacterial communities in terms of abundance showed that the bacterial communities of KS and GS were significantly different from BS, respectively. In addition, pH, alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN) and soil organic carbon (SOC) were positively correlated with the bacterial community of KS and negatively correlated with GS in the other three regions except Huanxi. Network analysis showed that the three soils in the four regions did not show a consistent pattern of network complexity. PICRUSt functional prediction analysis showed that the COG functions were similar in all samples. All colonies were involved in RNA processing and modification, chromatin structure and dynamics, etc. In conclusion, our experiments showed that rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco in different regions have different compositional patterns, which are strongly related to soil factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9622857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96228572022-11-02 Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions Shi, Haoqi Xu, Peiwen Wu, Shengxin Yu, Wen Cheng, Yazhi Chen, Zhihua Yang, Xingyou Yu, Xiangwen Li, Bingjie Ding, Anming Wang, Weifeng Sun, Yuhe Sci Rep Article Tobacco bacterial wilt has seriously affected tobacco production. Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) induced tobacco bacterial wilt resistant mutants are important for the control of tobacco bacterial wilt. High-throughput sequencing technology was used to study the rhizosphere bacterial community assemblages of bacterial wilt resistant mutant tobacco rhizosphere soil (namely KS), bacterial wilt susceptible tobacco rhizosphere soil (namely GS) and bulk soil (namely BS) in Xuancheng, Huanxi, Yibin and Luzhou. Alpha analysis showed that the bacterial community diversity and richness of KS and GS in the four regions were not significantly different. However, analysis of intergroup variation in the top 15 bacterial communities in terms of abundance showed that the bacterial communities of KS and GS were significantly different from BS, respectively. In addition, pH, alkali-hydrolysable nitrogen (AN) and soil organic carbon (SOC) were positively correlated with the bacterial community of KS and negatively correlated with GS in the other three regions except Huanxi. Network analysis showed that the three soils in the four regions did not show a consistent pattern of network complexity. PICRUSt functional prediction analysis showed that the COG functions were similar in all samples. All colonies were involved in RNA processing and modification, chromatin structure and dynamics, etc. In conclusion, our experiments showed that rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco in different regions have different compositional patterns, which are strongly related to soil factors. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9622857/ /pubmed/36316337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20293-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shi, Haoqi
Xu, Peiwen
Wu, Shengxin
Yu, Wen
Cheng, Yazhi
Chen, Zhihua
Yang, Xingyou
Yu, Xiangwen
Li, Bingjie
Ding, Anming
Wang, Weifeng
Sun, Yuhe
Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title_full Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title_fullStr Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title_short Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
title_sort analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9622857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-20293-6
work_keys_str_mv AT shihaoqi analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT xupeiwen analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT wushengxin analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT yuwen analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT chengyazhi analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT chenzhihua analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT yangxingyou analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT yuxiangwen analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT libingjie analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT dinganming analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT wangweifeng analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions
AT sunyuhe analysisofrhizospherebacterialcommunitiesoftobaccoresistantandnonresistanttobacterialwiltindifferentregions