Cargando…

Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis

BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices has steadily increased in recent years. In this group of patients with prosthetic valves or intracardiac devices, infective endocarditis could not be easily diagnosed, and in general, infective endocarditis can be missed in many patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamzayev, Metin, Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Demet, Özgür Barış, Veysel, Gül Tekin Cebeci, Cemre, Kılıçkap, Mustafa, Tutar, Eralp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943314
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1864
_version_ 1784821949457760256
author Hamzayev, Metin
Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Demet
Özgür Barış, Veysel
Gül Tekin Cebeci, Cemre
Kılıçkap, Mustafa
Tutar, Eralp
author_facet Hamzayev, Metin
Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Demet
Özgür Barış, Veysel
Gül Tekin Cebeci, Cemre
Kılıçkap, Mustafa
Tutar, Eralp
author_sort Hamzayev, Metin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices has steadily increased in recent years. In this group of patients with prosthetic valves or intracardiac devices, infective endocarditis could not be easily diagnosed, and in general, infective endocarditis can be missed in many patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters in a group of patients with pre-diagnosis of infective endocarditis. METHODS: Ninety-four patients diagnosed with prosthetic valve or intracardiac device endocarditis during 2008-2019 were included in the study. The patients’ data were evaluated according to modified Duke criteria, and the data of the patients who were diagnosed with and without a definitive infective endocarditis were compared accordingly. RESULTS: Values of procalcitonin (P < .001), leukocytes (P = .004), C-reactive protein (P < .001), sedimentation (P < .001), and maximal vegetation size (P = .012) were found to be significant in the diagnosis of IE. Criteria to determine definitive IE included a C-reactive protein level of 105 mg/dL or higher, 77% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 60% positive predictive value, and 87% negative predictive value. In particular, a C-reactive protein level of ≥105 mg/dL was found to positively indicate the diagnosis of definitive infective endocarditis by 10 times (odds ratio = 10; 95% CI: 3.6-27.8, P < .001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the C-reactive protein level was found to be the best independent predictor of definitive infective endocarditis in this population. CONCLUSION: In cases of prosthetic valve and intracardiac devices endocarditis where pre-diagnosis is difficult to confirm, measuring C-reactive protein levels is a reliable, strong, and simple parameter for definitive infective endocarditis diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Society of Cardiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96232292022-11-04 Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis Hamzayev, Metin Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Demet Özgür Barış, Veysel Gül Tekin Cebeci, Cemre Kılıçkap, Mustafa Tutar, Eralp Anatol J Cardiol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: The use of prosthetic valves and intracardiac devices has steadily increased in recent years. In this group of patients with prosthetic valves or intracardiac devices, infective endocarditis could not be easily diagnosed, and in general, infective endocarditis can be missed in many patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters in a group of patients with pre-diagnosis of infective endocarditis. METHODS: Ninety-four patients diagnosed with prosthetic valve or intracardiac device endocarditis during 2008-2019 were included in the study. The patients’ data were evaluated according to modified Duke criteria, and the data of the patients who were diagnosed with and without a definitive infective endocarditis were compared accordingly. RESULTS: Values of procalcitonin (P < .001), leukocytes (P = .004), C-reactive protein (P < .001), sedimentation (P < .001), and maximal vegetation size (P = .012) were found to be significant in the diagnosis of IE. Criteria to determine definitive IE included a C-reactive protein level of 105 mg/dL or higher, 77% sensitivity, 75% specificity, 60% positive predictive value, and 87% negative predictive value. In particular, a C-reactive protein level of ≥105 mg/dL was found to positively indicate the diagnosis of definitive infective endocarditis by 10 times (odds ratio = 10; 95% CI: 3.6-27.8, P < .001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the C-reactive protein level was found to be the best independent predictor of definitive infective endocarditis in this population. CONCLUSION: In cases of prosthetic valve and intracardiac devices endocarditis where pre-diagnosis is difficult to confirm, measuring C-reactive protein levels is a reliable, strong, and simple parameter for definitive infective endocarditis diagnosis. Turkish Society of Cardiology 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9623229/ /pubmed/35943314 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1864 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Hamzayev, Metin
Menekşe Gerede Uludağ, Demet
Özgür Barış, Veysel
Gül Tekin Cebeci, Cemre
Kılıçkap, Mustafa
Tutar, Eralp
Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title_full Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title_fullStr Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title_short Comparison of Biochemical Markers and Echocardiographic Parameters in the Diagnosis of Prosthetic Valve and Intracardiac Device Endocarditis
title_sort comparison of biochemical markers and echocardiographic parameters in the diagnosis of prosthetic valve and intracardiac device endocarditis
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35943314
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2022.1864
work_keys_str_mv AT hamzayevmetin comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis
AT meneksegeredeuludagdemet comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis
AT ozgurbarısveysel comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis
AT gultekincebecicemre comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis
AT kılıckapmustafa comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis
AT tutareralp comparisonofbiochemicalmarkersandechocardiographicparametersinthediagnosisofprostheticvalveandintracardiacdeviceendocarditis