Cargando…

Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on continence rate during 1-year follow-up of a preservation technique that included nonligation of the dorsal vascular complex and sparing of the puboprostatic ligaments and the endopelvic fascia during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Info...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gaona, José, Zuluaga, Margarita M., Flórez, Daniel H., Muñoz, Francia M., Rueda, Raul, Ortiz, Jairo, Sánchez, Daniel E., Gonzalez, Cesar, Gonzalez, Fabio, Rueda, Angélica M., Ortiz, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Turkish Association of Urology 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22113
_version_ 1784821987968811008
author Gaona, José
Zuluaga, Margarita M.
Flórez, Daniel H.
Muñoz, Francia M.
Rueda, Raul
Ortiz, Jairo
Sánchez, Daniel E.
Gonzalez, Cesar
Gonzalez, Fabio
Rueda, Angélica M.
Ortiz, Sebastian
author_facet Gaona, José
Zuluaga, Margarita M.
Flórez, Daniel H.
Muñoz, Francia M.
Rueda, Raul
Ortiz, Jairo
Sánchez, Daniel E.
Gonzalez, Cesar
Gonzalez, Fabio
Rueda, Angélica M.
Ortiz, Sebastian
author_sort Gaona, José
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on continence rate during 1-year follow-up of a preservation technique that included nonligation of the dorsal vascular complex and sparing of the puboprostatic ligaments and the endopelvic fascia during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information from 30 patients who underwent the preservation technique was prospectively collected and compared with data from 60 patients who underwent the nonpreservation traditional technique. A single surgeon performed all procedures. RESULTS: Demographic and preoperative characteristics were similar. The mean patient age was 59 years in both groups. All patients were stage cT1c or cT2. Operative time was significantly lower in the preservation technique group (229.6 vs. 262.7 minutes, P < .001). There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, discharge hemoglobin level, blood transfusion rate, length of hospitalization, and drop in the hemoglobin level. The probability of continence recovery was significantly higher in the preservation technique group than in the traditional technique group (hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.81). The continence rate (0 pads/day) for the preservation technique group versus the traditional technique group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was, respectively, 53.3% versus 30% (P = .031), 90% versus 45% (P < .001), 90% versus 63.3% (P = .008), and 96.6% versus 78.3% (P = .024). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding potency and oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Nonligation of the dorsal vascular complex and preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments and the endopelvic fascia improved urinary continence compared with the traditional nonpreservation technique, with no impact in terms of bleeding and oncologic outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Turkish Association of Urology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96233872022-11-04 Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence Gaona, José Zuluaga, Margarita M. Flórez, Daniel H. Muñoz, Francia M. Rueda, Raul Ortiz, Jairo Sánchez, Daniel E. Gonzalez, Cesar Gonzalez, Fabio Rueda, Angélica M. Ortiz, Sebastian Turk J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact on continence rate during 1-year follow-up of a preservation technique that included nonligation of the dorsal vascular complex and sparing of the puboprostatic ligaments and the endopelvic fascia during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Information from 30 patients who underwent the preservation technique was prospectively collected and compared with data from 60 patients who underwent the nonpreservation traditional technique. A single surgeon performed all procedures. RESULTS: Demographic and preoperative characteristics were similar. The mean patient age was 59 years in both groups. All patients were stage cT1c or cT2. Operative time was significantly lower in the preservation technique group (229.6 vs. 262.7 minutes, P < .001). There were no significant differences in intraoperative bleeding, discharge hemoglobin level, blood transfusion rate, length of hospitalization, and drop in the hemoglobin level. The probability of continence recovery was significantly higher in the preservation technique group than in the traditional technique group (hazard ratio = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.31-0.81). The continence rate (0 pads/day) for the preservation technique group versus the traditional technique group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months was, respectively, 53.3% versus 30% (P = .031), 90% versus 45% (P < .001), 90% versus 63.3% (P = .008), and 96.6% versus 78.3% (P = .024). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding potency and oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Nonligation of the dorsal vascular complex and preservation of the puboprostatic ligaments and the endopelvic fascia improved urinary continence compared with the traditional nonpreservation technique, with no impact in terms of bleeding and oncologic outcomes. Turkish Association of Urology 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9623387/ /pubmed/36197140 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22113 Text en © Copyright 2022 authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Gaona, José
Zuluaga, Margarita M.
Flórez, Daniel H.
Muñoz, Francia M.
Rueda, Raul
Ortiz, Jairo
Sánchez, Daniel E.
Gonzalez, Cesar
Gonzalez, Fabio
Rueda, Angélica M.
Ortiz, Sebastian
Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title_full Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title_fullStr Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title_full_unstemmed Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title_short Dorsal Vascular Complex Nonligation Method and Preservation of Puboprostatic Ligaments and Endopelvic Fascia During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Effect on Continence
title_sort dorsal vascular complex nonligation method and preservation of puboprostatic ligaments and endopelvic fascia during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: effect on continence
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36197140
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/tud.2022.22113
work_keys_str_mv AT gaonajose dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT zuluagamargaritam dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT florezdanielh dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT munozfranciam dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT ruedaraul dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT ortizjairo dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT sanchezdaniele dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT gonzalezcesar dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT gonzalezfabio dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT ruedaangelicam dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence
AT ortizsebastian dorsalvascularcomplexnonligationmethodandpreservationofpuboprostaticligamentsandendopelvicfasciaduringlaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyeffectoncontinence