Cargando…

Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle

Pain management is a key element of ensuring animal welfare. Although the opinions of both producers and veterinarians affect decisions about the use of pain mitigation on cattle operations, little is known about how they communicate about this topic. Given the importance of a veterinary-client-pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mijares, Sage, Edwards-Callaway, Lily, Johnstone, Elizabeth, Stallones, Lorann, Román-Muñiz, Noa, Cramer, Catie, Coetzee, Johann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2022-0232
_version_ 1784822085407735808
author Mijares, Sage
Edwards-Callaway, Lily
Johnstone, Elizabeth
Stallones, Lorann
Román-Muñiz, Noa
Cramer, Catie
Coetzee, Johann
author_facet Mijares, Sage
Edwards-Callaway, Lily
Johnstone, Elizabeth
Stallones, Lorann
Román-Muñiz, Noa
Cramer, Catie
Coetzee, Johann
author_sort Mijares, Sage
collection PubMed
description Pain management is a key element of ensuring animal welfare. Although the opinions of both producers and veterinarians affect decisions about the use of pain mitigation on cattle operations, little is known about how they communicate about this topic. Given the importance of a veterinary-client-patient relationship for developing pain mitigation protocols, understanding the communication between veterinarians and producers is key to the implementation of robust, industry-wide pain management protocols. The objectives of this survey were to understand how producers and veterinarians may respond to disagreements about pain mitigation and to determine where respondents obtain their knowledge about pain recognition and treatment. Results presented herein are part of a larger study previously described. An online survey was distributed to 6 cattle industry groups. Surveys that were >80% complete were included for analysis (n = 1,066). Approximately half of the respondents identified as producers (497, 46.6%) and half as veterinarians (569, 53.4%). The majority of producers believed that disagreements about the use of pain management in cattle never affected their relationship with their veterinarians (349, 70.2%). The veterinarian respondents indicated more disagreements, although the frequency was relatively low, with 43.9% (250) indicated having a disagreement less than once a year. Most producers and veterinarians indicated they were either “extremely unlikely” or “somewhat unlikely” to dissolve the relationship completely if disagreements about pain management arose (veterinarians: 398/569, 70%; producers: 294/497, 59.1%). Veterinarians and producers reported gaining their knowledge about pain recognition from a variety of sources including personal experience and continuing education opportunities. Disagreements about pain mitigation occurred infrequently; however, this could be due to few discussions about pain management in general. These results indicated that there is opportunity for veterinarians to engage with their producers in more discussions about pain management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623791
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96237912022-11-04 Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle Mijares, Sage Edwards-Callaway, Lily Johnstone, Elizabeth Stallones, Lorann Román-Muñiz, Noa Cramer, Catie Coetzee, Johann JDS Commun Health, Behavior, and Well-being Pain management is a key element of ensuring animal welfare. Although the opinions of both producers and veterinarians affect decisions about the use of pain mitigation on cattle operations, little is known about how they communicate about this topic. Given the importance of a veterinary-client-patient relationship for developing pain mitigation protocols, understanding the communication between veterinarians and producers is key to the implementation of robust, industry-wide pain management protocols. The objectives of this survey were to understand how producers and veterinarians may respond to disagreements about pain mitigation and to determine where respondents obtain their knowledge about pain recognition and treatment. Results presented herein are part of a larger study previously described. An online survey was distributed to 6 cattle industry groups. Surveys that were >80% complete were included for analysis (n = 1,066). Approximately half of the respondents identified as producers (497, 46.6%) and half as veterinarians (569, 53.4%). The majority of producers believed that disagreements about the use of pain management in cattle never affected their relationship with their veterinarians (349, 70.2%). The veterinarian respondents indicated more disagreements, although the frequency was relatively low, with 43.9% (250) indicated having a disagreement less than once a year. Most producers and veterinarians indicated they were either “extremely unlikely” or “somewhat unlikely” to dissolve the relationship completely if disagreements about pain management arose (veterinarians: 398/569, 70%; producers: 294/497, 59.1%). Veterinarians and producers reported gaining their knowledge about pain recognition from a variety of sources including personal experience and continuing education opportunities. Disagreements about pain mitigation occurred infrequently; however, this could be due to few discussions about pain management in general. These results indicated that there is opportunity for veterinarians to engage with their producers in more discussions about pain management. Elsevier 2022-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9623791/ /pubmed/36340899 http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2022-0232 Text en © 2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Health, Behavior, and Well-being
Mijares, Sage
Edwards-Callaway, Lily
Johnstone, Elizabeth
Stallones, Lorann
Román-Muñiz, Noa
Cramer, Catie
Coetzee, Johann
Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title_full Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title_fullStr Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title_short Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
title_sort frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle
topic Health, Behavior, and Well-being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623791/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340899
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2022-0232
work_keys_str_mv AT mijaressage frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT edwardscallawaylily frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT johnstoneelizabeth frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT stalloneslorann frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT romanmuniznoa frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT cramercatie frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle
AT coetzeejohann frequencyofdisagreementsbetweenproducersandveterinariansaboutpainmanagementincattle