Cargando…

Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019

The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe antimicrobial resistance trends in Klebsiella isolates cultured from milk samples submitted to the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for bovine mastitis testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted in 483 Klebsi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuenzalida, M.J., Furmaga, E., Aulik, N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2020-0031
_version_ 1784822088638398464
author Fuenzalida, M.J.
Furmaga, E.
Aulik, N.
author_facet Fuenzalida, M.J.
Furmaga, E.
Aulik, N.
author_sort Fuenzalida, M.J.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe antimicrobial resistance trends in Klebsiella isolates cultured from milk samples submitted to the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for bovine mastitis testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted in 483 Klebsiella isolates cultured from 63,841 milk samples submitted from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2019. The Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory conducted antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute by using a broth microdilution panel. Ten antimicrobials were tested in the panel: ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin, oxacillin + 2% NaCl, pirlimycin, penicillin/novobiocin, tetracycline, ceftiofur, cephalothin, and sulfadimethoxine. Isolates were considered resistant to specific antimicrobials based on minimum inhibitory concentrations described in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. No guidelines were available for sulfadimethoxine; isolates were categorized as resistant when bacterial growth was not inhibited. The proportion of isolates resistant to ceftiofur, cephalothin, or tetracycline did not increase over time. For sulfadimethoxine, the proportion of resistant isolates decreased over time. These results do not demonstrate a trend toward increasing antimicrobial resistance among Klebsiella isolates. Despite that, antimicrobial resistance should continue to be monitored.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623802
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96238022022-11-04 Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019 Fuenzalida, M.J. Furmaga, E. Aulik, N. JDS Commun Health, Behavior, and Well-being The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe antimicrobial resistance trends in Klebsiella isolates cultured from milk samples submitted to the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for bovine mastitis testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was conducted in 483 Klebsiella isolates cultured from 63,841 milk samples submitted from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2019. The Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory conducted antimicrobial susceptibility testing according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute by using a broth microdilution panel. Ten antimicrobials were tested in the panel: ampicillin, penicillin, erythromycin, oxacillin + 2% NaCl, pirlimycin, penicillin/novobiocin, tetracycline, ceftiofur, cephalothin, and sulfadimethoxine. Isolates were considered resistant to specific antimicrobials based on minimum inhibitory concentrations described in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. No guidelines were available for sulfadimethoxine; isolates were categorized as resistant when bacterial growth was not inhibited. The proportion of isolates resistant to ceftiofur, cephalothin, or tetracycline did not increase over time. For sulfadimethoxine, the proportion of resistant isolates decreased over time. These results do not demonstrate a trend toward increasing antimicrobial resistance among Klebsiella isolates. Despite that, antimicrobial resistance should continue to be monitored. Elsevier 2021-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9623802/ /pubmed/36339509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2020-0031 Text en © 2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Health, Behavior, and Well-being
Fuenzalida, M.J.
Furmaga, E.
Aulik, N.
Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title_full Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title_fullStr Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title_short Antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the Wisconsin Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, 2008–2019
title_sort antimicrobial resistance in klebsiella species from milk specimens submitted for bovine mastitis testing at the wisconsin veterinary diagnostic laboratory, 2008–2019
topic Health, Behavior, and Well-being
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623802/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2020-0031
work_keys_str_mv AT fuenzalidamj antimicrobialresistanceinklebsiellaspeciesfrommilkspecimenssubmittedforbovinemastitistestingatthewisconsinveterinarydiagnosticlaboratory20082019
AT furmagae antimicrobialresistanceinklebsiellaspeciesfrommilkspecimenssubmittedforbovinemastitistestingatthewisconsinveterinarydiagnosticlaboratory20082019
AT aulikn antimicrobialresistanceinklebsiellaspeciesfrommilkspecimenssubmittedforbovinemastitistestingatthewisconsinveterinarydiagnosticlaboratory20082019