Cargando…
A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care
BACKGROUND: Validated measures of patient-reported experiences are essential for assessing and improving the quality of mental health services and interventions. In Norwegian mental healthcare settings, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is increasingly being used for this purpose, but th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8 |
_version_ | 1784822114556051456 |
---|---|
author | Pedersen, Henrik Havnen, Audun Brattmyr, Martin Attkisson, C. Clifford Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L. |
author_facet | Pedersen, Henrik Havnen, Audun Brattmyr, Martin Attkisson, C. Clifford Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L. |
author_sort | Pedersen, Henrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Validated measures of patient-reported experiences are essential for assessing and improving the quality of mental health services and interventions. In Norwegian mental healthcare settings, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is increasingly being used for this purpose, but the validity and reliability of the Norwegian translation have not been investigated. METHODS: We examined the factor structure and internal consistency of a digitally administrated Norwegian translation of the CSQ-8 in a sample of 338 patients recruited from outpatient treatment. The relationship between satisfaction scores and the change in symptom severity during treatment, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, was also investigated. RESULTS: The Norwegian CSQ-8 showed a clear unidimensional structure with one factor explaining 74% of the variance. Internal consistency was very high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. Satisfaction showed a small-to-moderate negative relationship with change in symptom severity. Satisfaction scores were negatively skewed, and the presence of ceiling effects is discussed. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of the Norwegian CSQ-8 as a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with mental healthcare services. Further studies are needed to determine the test-retest reliability of the questionnaire, its sensitivity to change, and to assess its propensity to ceiling effects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9623922 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96239222022-11-02 A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care Pedersen, Henrik Havnen, Audun Brattmyr, Martin Attkisson, C. Clifford Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L. BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Validated measures of patient-reported experiences are essential for assessing and improving the quality of mental health services and interventions. In Norwegian mental healthcare settings, the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is increasingly being used for this purpose, but the validity and reliability of the Norwegian translation have not been investigated. METHODS: We examined the factor structure and internal consistency of a digitally administrated Norwegian translation of the CSQ-8 in a sample of 338 patients recruited from outpatient treatment. The relationship between satisfaction scores and the change in symptom severity during treatment, measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, was also investigated. RESULTS: The Norwegian CSQ-8 showed a clear unidimensional structure with one factor explaining 74% of the variance. Internal consistency was very high, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. Satisfaction showed a small-to-moderate negative relationship with change in symptom severity. Satisfaction scores were negatively skewed, and the presence of ceiling effects is discussed. CONCLUSION: Our results support the use of the Norwegian CSQ-8 as a valid and reliable measure of satisfaction with mental healthcare services. Further studies are needed to determine the test-retest reliability of the questionnaire, its sensitivity to change, and to assess its propensity to ceiling effects. BioMed Central 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9623922/ /pubmed/36316661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pedersen, Henrik Havnen, Audun Brattmyr, Martin Attkisson, C. Clifford Lara-Cabrera, Mariela L. A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title | A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title_full | A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title_fullStr | A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title_full_unstemmed | A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title_short | A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
title_sort | digital norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623922/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pedersenhenrik adigitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT havnenaudun adigitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT brattmyrmartin adigitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT attkissoncclifford adigitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT laracabreramarielal adigitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT pedersenhenrik digitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT havnenaudun digitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT brattmyrmartin digitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT attkissoncclifford digitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare AT laracabreramarielal digitalnorwegianversionoftheclientsatisfactionquestionnaire8factorvalidityandinternalreliabilityinoutpatientmentalhealthcare |