Cargando…

Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest

BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Via, Garrhett G., Brueggeman, David A., Lyons, Joseph G., Ely, Isabelle C., Froehle, Andrew W., Krishnamurthy, Anil B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3
_version_ 1784822117757353984
author Via, Garrhett G.
Brueggeman, David A.
Lyons, Joseph G.
Ely, Isabelle C.
Froehle, Andrew W.
Krishnamurthy, Anil B.
author_facet Via, Garrhett G.
Brueggeman, David A.
Lyons, Joseph G.
Ely, Isabelle C.
Froehle, Andrew W.
Krishnamurthy, Anil B.
author_sort Via, Garrhett G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. CONCLUSIONS: Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Systematic Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623935
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96239352022-11-02 Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest Via, Garrhett G. Brueggeman, David A. Lyons, Joseph G. Ely, Isabelle C. Froehle, Andrew W. Krishnamurthy, Anil B. Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. CONCLUSIONS: Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Systematic Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9623935/ /pubmed/36316729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Via, Garrhett G.
Brueggeman, David A.
Lyons, Joseph G.
Ely, Isabelle C.
Froehle, Andrew W.
Krishnamurthy, Anil B.
Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_full Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_fullStr Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_full_unstemmed Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_short Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
title_sort funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623935/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316729
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3
work_keys_str_mv AT viagarrhettg fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT brueggemandavida fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT lyonsjosephg fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT elyisabellec fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT froehleandreww fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest
AT krishnamurthyanilb fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest