Cargando…
Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest
BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3 |
_version_ | 1784822117757353984 |
---|---|
author | Via, Garrhett G. Brueggeman, David A. Lyons, Joseph G. Ely, Isabelle C. Froehle, Andrew W. Krishnamurthy, Anil B. |
author_facet | Via, Garrhett G. Brueggeman, David A. Lyons, Joseph G. Ely, Isabelle C. Froehle, Andrew W. Krishnamurthy, Anil B. |
author_sort | Via, Garrhett G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. CONCLUSIONS: Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Systematic Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9623935 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96239352022-11-02 Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest Via, Garrhett G. Brueggeman, David A. Lyons, Joseph G. Ely, Isabelle C. Froehle, Andrew W. Krishnamurthy, Anil B. Arthroplasty Research BACKGROUND: The use of new total joint arthroplasty technologies, including patient-specific implants/instrumentation (PSI), computer-assisted (CA), and robotic-assisted (RA) techniques, is increasing. There is an ongoing debate regarding the value provided and potential concerns about conflicts of interest (COI). METHODS: PRISMA guidelines were followed. PubMed, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases were searched for total hip and knee arthroplasties, unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA), PSI, CA, and RA. Bibliometric data, financial COI, clinical/functional scores, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-seven studies were evaluated, with 35 (40.2%) including at least one author reporting COI, and 13 (14.9%) disclosing industry funding. COI and industry funding had no significant effects on outcomes (P = 0.682, P = 0.447), and there were no significant effects of conflicts or funding on level of evidence (P = 0.508, P = 0.826). Studies in which author(s) disclosed COI had significantly higher relative citation ratio (RCR) and impact factor (IF) than those without (P < 0.001, P = 0.032). Subanalysis demonstrated RA and PSI studies were more likely to report COI or industry funding (P = 0.045). RA (OR = 6.31, 95% CI: 1.61–24.68) and UKA (OR = 9.14, 95% CI: 1.43–58.53) had higher odds of reporting favorable outcomes than PSI. CONCLUSIONS: Author COIs (about 40%) may be lower than previously reported in orthopedic technologies/techniques reviews. Studies utilizing RA and PSI were more likely to report COI, while RA and UKA studies were more likely to report favorable outcomes than PSI. No statistically significant association between the presence of COIs and/or industry funding and the frequency of favorable outcomes or study level of evidence was found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V Systematic Review SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3. BioMed Central 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9623935/ /pubmed/36316729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Via, Garrhett G. Brueggeman, David A. Lyons, Joseph G. Ely, Isabelle C. Froehle, Andrew W. Krishnamurthy, Anil B. Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title | Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title_full | Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title_fullStr | Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title_full_unstemmed | Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title_short | Funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
title_sort | funding has no effect on clinical outcomes of total joint arthroplasty emerging technologies: a systematic review of bibliometrics and conflicts of interest |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42836-022-00146-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT viagarrhettg fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest AT brueggemandavida fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest AT lyonsjosephg fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest AT elyisabellec fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest AT froehleandreww fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest AT krishnamurthyanilb fundinghasnoeffectonclinicaloutcomesoftotaljointarthroplastyemergingtechnologiesasystematicreviewofbibliometricsandconflictsofinterest |