Cargando…

Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study

BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumkötter, Rieke, Yilmaz, Simge, Zahn, Daniela, Fenzl, Katharina, Prochaska, Jürgen H., Rossmann, Heidi, Schmidtmann, Irene, Schuster, Alexander K., Beutel, Manfred E., Lackner, Karl J., Münzel, Thomas, Wild, Philipp S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6
_version_ 1784822123791908864
author Baumkötter, Rieke
Yilmaz, Simge
Zahn, Daniela
Fenzl, Katharina
Prochaska, Jürgen H.
Rossmann, Heidi
Schmidtmann, Irene
Schuster, Alexander K.
Beutel, Manfred E.
Lackner, Karl J.
Münzel, Thomas
Wild, Philipp S.
author_facet Baumkötter, Rieke
Yilmaz, Simge
Zahn, Daniela
Fenzl, Katharina
Prochaska, Jürgen H.
Rossmann, Heidi
Schmidtmann, Irene
Schuster, Alexander K.
Beutel, Manfred E.
Lackner, Karl J.
Münzel, Thomas
Wild, Philipp S.
author_sort Baumkötter, Rieke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project was to assess the effect of protective behavior on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population. METHODS: Data of the Gutenberg COVID-19 Study (GCS), a prospective cohort study with a representative population-based sample, were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified by sequential sampling of biomaterial, which was analyzed by RT-qPCR and two antibody immunoassays. Self-reported COVID-19 test results were additionally considered. Information on protective behavior including physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene was collected via serial questionnaire-based assessments. To estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and hazard ratios, robust Poisson regression and Cox regression were applied. RESULTS: In total, 10,250 participants were enrolled (median age 56.9 [43.3/68.6] years, 50.8% females). Adherence to preventive measures was moderate for physical distancing (48.3%), while the use of face masks (91.5%) and the frequency of handwashing (75.0%) were high. Physical distancing appeared to be a protective factor with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection risk independent of sociodemographic characteristics and individual pandemic-related behavior (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.96). A protective association between wearing face masks and SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified (PR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96). However, the protective effect declined after controlling for potential confounding factors (PR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.36). For handwashing, this investigation did not find a beneficial impact. The adherence to protective behavior was not affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or immunization against COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests primarily a preventive impact of physical distancing of 1.5 m, but also of wearing face masks on SARS-CoV-2 infections, supporting their widespread implementation. The proper fit and use of face masks are crucial for effectively mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9623959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96239592022-11-02 Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study Baumkötter, Rieke Yilmaz, Simge Zahn, Daniela Fenzl, Katharina Prochaska, Jürgen H. Rossmann, Heidi Schmidtmann, Irene Schuster, Alexander K. Beutel, Manfred E. Lackner, Karl J. Münzel, Thomas Wild, Philipp S. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project was to assess the effect of protective behavior on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population. METHODS: Data of the Gutenberg COVID-19 Study (GCS), a prospective cohort study with a representative population-based sample, were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified by sequential sampling of biomaterial, which was analyzed by RT-qPCR and two antibody immunoassays. Self-reported COVID-19 test results were additionally considered. Information on protective behavior including physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene was collected via serial questionnaire-based assessments. To estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and hazard ratios, robust Poisson regression and Cox regression were applied. RESULTS: In total, 10,250 participants were enrolled (median age 56.9 [43.3/68.6] years, 50.8% females). Adherence to preventive measures was moderate for physical distancing (48.3%), while the use of face masks (91.5%) and the frequency of handwashing (75.0%) were high. Physical distancing appeared to be a protective factor with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection risk independent of sociodemographic characteristics and individual pandemic-related behavior (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.96). A protective association between wearing face masks and SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified (PR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96). However, the protective effect declined after controlling for potential confounding factors (PR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.36). For handwashing, this investigation did not find a beneficial impact. The adherence to protective behavior was not affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or immunization against COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests primarily a preventive impact of physical distancing of 1.5 m, but also of wearing face masks on SARS-CoV-2 infections, supporting their widespread implementation. The proper fit and use of face masks are crucial for effectively mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6. BioMed Central 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9623959/ /pubmed/36316662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Baumkötter, Rieke
Yilmaz, Simge
Zahn, Daniela
Fenzl, Katharina
Prochaska, Jürgen H.
Rossmann, Heidi
Schmidtmann, Irene
Schuster, Alexander K.
Beutel, Manfred E.
Lackner, Karl J.
Münzel, Thomas
Wild, Philipp S.
Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title_full Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title_fullStr Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title_full_unstemmed Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title_short Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
title_sort protective behavior and sars-cov-2 infection risk in the population – results from the gutenberg covid-19 study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6
work_keys_str_mv AT baumkotterrieke protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT yilmazsimge protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT zahndaniela protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT fenzlkatharina protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT prochaskajurgenh protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT rossmannheidi protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT schmidtmannirene protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT schusteralexanderk protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT beutelmanfrede protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT lacknerkarlj protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT munzelthomas protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study
AT wildphilipps protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study