Cargando…
Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study
BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project w...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6 |
_version_ | 1784822123791908864 |
---|---|
author | Baumkötter, Rieke Yilmaz, Simge Zahn, Daniela Fenzl, Katharina Prochaska, Jürgen H. Rossmann, Heidi Schmidtmann, Irene Schuster, Alexander K. Beutel, Manfred E. Lackner, Karl J. Münzel, Thomas Wild, Philipp S. |
author_facet | Baumkötter, Rieke Yilmaz, Simge Zahn, Daniela Fenzl, Katharina Prochaska, Jürgen H. Rossmann, Heidi Schmidtmann, Irene Schuster, Alexander K. Beutel, Manfred E. Lackner, Karl J. Münzel, Thomas Wild, Philipp S. |
author_sort | Baumkötter, Rieke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project was to assess the effect of protective behavior on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population. METHODS: Data of the Gutenberg COVID-19 Study (GCS), a prospective cohort study with a representative population-based sample, were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified by sequential sampling of biomaterial, which was analyzed by RT-qPCR and two antibody immunoassays. Self-reported COVID-19 test results were additionally considered. Information on protective behavior including physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene was collected via serial questionnaire-based assessments. To estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and hazard ratios, robust Poisson regression and Cox regression were applied. RESULTS: In total, 10,250 participants were enrolled (median age 56.9 [43.3/68.6] years, 50.8% females). Adherence to preventive measures was moderate for physical distancing (48.3%), while the use of face masks (91.5%) and the frequency of handwashing (75.0%) were high. Physical distancing appeared to be a protective factor with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection risk independent of sociodemographic characteristics and individual pandemic-related behavior (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.96). A protective association between wearing face masks and SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified (PR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96). However, the protective effect declined after controlling for potential confounding factors (PR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.36). For handwashing, this investigation did not find a beneficial impact. The adherence to protective behavior was not affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or immunization against COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests primarily a preventive impact of physical distancing of 1.5 m, but also of wearing face masks on SARS-CoV-2 infections, supporting their widespread implementation. The proper fit and use of face masks are crucial for effectively mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9623959 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96239592022-11-02 Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study Baumkötter, Rieke Yilmaz, Simge Zahn, Daniela Fenzl, Katharina Prochaska, Jürgen H. Rossmann, Heidi Schmidtmann, Irene Schuster, Alexander K. Beutel, Manfred E. Lackner, Karl J. Münzel, Thomas Wild, Philipp S. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, preventive measures like physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene have been widely applied to mitigate viral transmission. Beyond increasing vaccination coverage, preventive measures remain urgently needed. The aim of the present project was to assess the effect of protective behavior on SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population. METHODS: Data of the Gutenberg COVID-19 Study (GCS), a prospective cohort study with a representative population-based sample, were analyzed. SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified by sequential sampling of biomaterial, which was analyzed by RT-qPCR and two antibody immunoassays. Self-reported COVID-19 test results were additionally considered. Information on protective behavior including physical distancing, wearing face masks, and hand hygiene was collected via serial questionnaire-based assessments. To estimate adjusted prevalence ratios and hazard ratios, robust Poisson regression and Cox regression were applied. RESULTS: In total, 10,250 participants were enrolled (median age 56.9 [43.3/68.6] years, 50.8% females). Adherence to preventive measures was moderate for physical distancing (48.3%), while the use of face masks (91.5%) and the frequency of handwashing (75.0%) were high. Physical distancing appeared to be a protective factor with respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection risk independent of sociodemographic characteristics and individual pandemic-related behavior (prevalence ratio [PR] = 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62–0.96). A protective association between wearing face masks and SARS-CoV-2 transmission was identified (PR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96). However, the protective effect declined after controlling for potential confounding factors (PR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.68–1.36). For handwashing, this investigation did not find a beneficial impact. The adherence to protective behavior was not affected by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or immunization against COVID-19. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests primarily a preventive impact of physical distancing of 1.5 m, but also of wearing face masks on SARS-CoV-2 infections, supporting their widespread implementation. The proper fit and use of face masks are crucial for effectively mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the population. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6. BioMed Central 2022-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9623959/ /pubmed/36316662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Baumkötter, Rieke Yilmaz, Simge Zahn, Daniela Fenzl, Katharina Prochaska, Jürgen H. Rossmann, Heidi Schmidtmann, Irene Schuster, Alexander K. Beutel, Manfred E. Lackner, Karl J. Münzel, Thomas Wild, Philipp S. Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title | Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title_full | Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title_fullStr | Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title_full_unstemmed | Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title_short | Protective behavior and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk in the population – Results from the Gutenberg COVID-19 study |
title_sort | protective behavior and sars-cov-2 infection risk in the population – results from the gutenberg covid-19 study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9623959/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36316662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14310-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumkotterrieke protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT yilmazsimge protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT zahndaniela protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT fenzlkatharina protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT prochaskajurgenh protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT rossmannheidi protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT schmidtmannirene protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT schusteralexanderk protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT beutelmanfrede protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT lacknerkarlj protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT munzelthomas protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study AT wildphilipps protectivebehaviorandsarscov2infectionriskinthepopulationresultsfromthegutenbergcovid19study |