Cargando…

Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung

BACKGROUND: Recently, a new type of pulmonary nodule positioning needle has been adopted clinically. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new type of localization needles compared with coils for the simultaneous localization of multiple pulmonary nodules guided by computed tomography (C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Ya-Yong, Wang, Tao, Fu, Yu-Fei, Shi, Yi-Bing, Cao, Wei, Hou, Ju-Pan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02192-8
_version_ 1784822141770792960
author Huang, Ya-Yong
Wang, Tao
Fu, Yu-Fei
Shi, Yi-Bing
Cao, Wei
Hou, Ju-Pan
author_facet Huang, Ya-Yong
Wang, Tao
Fu, Yu-Fei
Shi, Yi-Bing
Cao, Wei
Hou, Ju-Pan
author_sort Huang, Ya-Yong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recently, a new type of pulmonary nodule positioning needle has been adopted clinically. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new type of localization needles compared with coils for the simultaneous localization of multiple pulmonary nodules guided by computed tomography (CT) prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2021 to March 2022, 87 pulmonary nodules from 40 patients were localized using the new localization needle. From January 2020 to December 2020, 68 pulmonary nodules in 31 patients were localized using coils. The relative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The success rate of pulmonary nodule localization in the needle group was 97.7% while that in the coil group was 98.5%. In the needle group, the time needed to locate the first nodule was significantly shorter than in the coil group (10.9 min vs. 17.2 min, P = 0.001). Moreover, the time needed per patient was also significantly shorter for the needle group compared with the coil group (23.7 min vs. 30 min, P = 0.017). The incidence of pneumothorax in the needle group was 25.0% vs. 12.9% in the coil group (P = 0.204). The rate of pulmonary hemorrhage in the needle group was 40.0% vs. 32.3% in the coil group (P = 0.502). The success rate of VATS wedge resection was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both disposable pulmonary nodule localization needles and coils are safe and effective for CT-guided localization of multiple pulmonary nodules of the same stage prior to VATS. However, the use of needles is time-saving compared with the use of coils. The coil localization may exhibit better safety than needle localization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96240312022-11-02 Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung Huang, Ya-Yong Wang, Tao Fu, Yu-Fei Shi, Yi-Bing Cao, Wei Hou, Ju-Pan BMC Pulm Med Research BACKGROUND: Recently, a new type of pulmonary nodule positioning needle has been adopted clinically. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new type of localization needles compared with coils for the simultaneous localization of multiple pulmonary nodules guided by computed tomography (CT) prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2021 to March 2022, 87 pulmonary nodules from 40 patients were localized using the new localization needle. From January 2020 to December 2020, 68 pulmonary nodules in 31 patients were localized using coils. The relative outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The success rate of pulmonary nodule localization in the needle group was 97.7% while that in the coil group was 98.5%. In the needle group, the time needed to locate the first nodule was significantly shorter than in the coil group (10.9 min vs. 17.2 min, P = 0.001). Moreover, the time needed per patient was also significantly shorter for the needle group compared with the coil group (23.7 min vs. 30 min, P = 0.017). The incidence of pneumothorax in the needle group was 25.0% vs. 12.9% in the coil group (P = 0.204). The rate of pulmonary hemorrhage in the needle group was 40.0% vs. 32.3% in the coil group (P = 0.502). The success rate of VATS wedge resection was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both disposable pulmonary nodule localization needles and coils are safe and effective for CT-guided localization of multiple pulmonary nodules of the same stage prior to VATS. However, the use of needles is time-saving compared with the use of coils. The coil localization may exhibit better safety than needle localization. BioMed Central 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624031/ /pubmed/36319999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02192-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Huang, Ya-Yong
Wang, Tao
Fu, Yu-Fei
Shi, Yi-Bing
Cao, Wei
Hou, Ju-Pan
Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title_full Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title_fullStr Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title_short Comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
title_sort comparison of the effectiveness of anchoring needles and coils in localizing multiple nodules in the lung
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12890-022-02192-8
work_keys_str_mv AT huangyayong comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung
AT wangtao comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung
AT fuyufei comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung
AT shiyibing comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung
AT caowei comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung
AT houjupan comparisonoftheeffectivenessofanchoringneedlesandcoilsinlocalizingmultiplenodulesinthelung