Cargando…

Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study

BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Musser, Margaret L., Clifford, Craig A., Bergman, Philip J., Treml, Laura S., McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook, McNiel, Elizabeth A., Johannes, Chad M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49
_version_ 1784822152407547904
author Musser, Margaret L.
Clifford, Craig A.
Bergman, Philip J.
Treml, Laura S.
McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook
McNiel, Elizabeth A.
Johannes, Chad M.
author_facet Musser, Margaret L.
Clifford, Craig A.
Bergman, Philip J.
Treml, Laura S.
McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook
McNiel, Elizabeth A.
Johannes, Chad M.
author_sort Musser, Margaret L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This study examined the impact of L‐CHOP (L‐asparaginase, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy or L‐CHOP in combination with AT‐005, a US Department of Agriculture‐licensed caninised monoclonal antibody, on PFS and response rates in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled, investigator‐ and owner‐blinded, multicentre study was completed. All dogs received a 19‐week L‐CHOP chemotherapy protocol with randomisation (1:1) into placebo or AT‐005 groups. Response was evaluated via the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for canine lymphoma. RESULTS: Forty‐nine dogs were enrolled (25 received placebo and 24 received AT‐005). Most demographic factors were similar between the two groups, with the exception that more dogs with stage IV and V disease were treated with AT‐005 (34% vs. 8%; p = 0.03). Median PFS was 103 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–118) in the placebo group versus 64 days (95% CI, 36–118) in the AT‐005 group. The overall response rate (ORR) for all dogs was 98% (48 of 49); complete response rate in the placebo group (64%) was not different from the AT‐005 group (67%). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first prospective study to document that treatment with L‐CHOP chemotherapy, with or without AT‐005, may result in a high ORR, but relatively brief PFS in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade T‐cell lymphoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96240702022-11-02 Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study Musser, Margaret L. Clifford, Craig A. Bergman, Philip J. Treml, Laura S. McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook McNiel, Elizabeth A. Johannes, Chad M. Vet Rec Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This study examined the impact of L‐CHOP (L‐asparaginase, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy or L‐CHOP in combination with AT‐005, a US Department of Agriculture‐licensed caninised monoclonal antibody, on PFS and response rates in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled, investigator‐ and owner‐blinded, multicentre study was completed. All dogs received a 19‐week L‐CHOP chemotherapy protocol with randomisation (1:1) into placebo or AT‐005 groups. Response was evaluated via the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for canine lymphoma. RESULTS: Forty‐nine dogs were enrolled (25 received placebo and 24 received AT‐005). Most demographic factors were similar between the two groups, with the exception that more dogs with stage IV and V disease were treated with AT‐005 (34% vs. 8%; p = 0.03). Median PFS was 103 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–118) in the placebo group versus 64 days (95% CI, 36–118) in the AT‐005 group. The overall response rate (ORR) for all dogs was 98% (48 of 49); complete response rate in the placebo group (64%) was not different from the AT‐005 group (67%). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first prospective study to document that treatment with L‐CHOP chemotherapy, with or without AT‐005, may result in a high ORR, but relatively brief PFS in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade T‐cell lymphoma. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624070/ /pubmed/36329876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Record Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Musser, Margaret L.
Clifford, Craig A.
Bergman, Philip J.
Treml, Laura S.
McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook
McNiel, Elizabeth A.
Johannes, Chad M.
Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title_full Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title_fullStr Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title_full_unstemmed Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title_short Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
title_sort randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine t‐cell lymphoma: a multicentre us study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49
work_keys_str_mv AT mussermargaretl randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT cliffordcraiga randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT bergmanphilipj randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT tremllauras randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT mcanultylydiaccook randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT mcnielelizabetha randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy
AT johanneschadm randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy