Cargando…
Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study
BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49 |
_version_ | 1784822152407547904 |
---|---|
author | Musser, Margaret L. Clifford, Craig A. Bergman, Philip J. Treml, Laura S. McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook McNiel, Elizabeth A. Johannes, Chad M. |
author_facet | Musser, Margaret L. Clifford, Craig A. Bergman, Philip J. Treml, Laura S. McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook McNiel, Elizabeth A. Johannes, Chad M. |
author_sort | Musser, Margaret L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This study examined the impact of L‐CHOP (L‐asparaginase, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy or L‐CHOP in combination with AT‐005, a US Department of Agriculture‐licensed caninised monoclonal antibody, on PFS and response rates in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled, investigator‐ and owner‐blinded, multicentre study was completed. All dogs received a 19‐week L‐CHOP chemotherapy protocol with randomisation (1:1) into placebo or AT‐005 groups. Response was evaluated via the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for canine lymphoma. RESULTS: Forty‐nine dogs were enrolled (25 received placebo and 24 received AT‐005). Most demographic factors were similar between the two groups, with the exception that more dogs with stage IV and V disease were treated with AT‐005 (34% vs. 8%; p = 0.03). Median PFS was 103 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–118) in the placebo group versus 64 days (95% CI, 36–118) in the AT‐005 group. The overall response rate (ORR) for all dogs was 98% (48 of 49); complete response rate in the placebo group (64%) was not different from the AT‐005 group (67%). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first prospective study to document that treatment with L‐CHOP chemotherapy, with or without AT‐005, may result in a high ORR, but relatively brief PFS in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade T‐cell lymphoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96240702022-11-02 Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study Musser, Margaret L. Clifford, Craig A. Bergman, Philip J. Treml, Laura S. McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook McNiel, Elizabeth A. Johannes, Chad M. Vet Rec Open Original Research BACKGROUND: Canine peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma is considered chemotherapy resistant and carries a relatively poor prognosis. Prospective evaluations reporting the impact of chemotherapy on progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival time for dogs with T‐cell lymphoma are lacking. This study examined the impact of L‐CHOP (L‐asparaginase, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy or L‐CHOP in combination with AT‐005, a US Department of Agriculture‐licensed caninised monoclonal antibody, on PFS and response rates in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade peripheral nodal T‐cell lymphoma. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, placebo‐controlled, investigator‐ and owner‐blinded, multicentre study was completed. All dogs received a 19‐week L‐CHOP chemotherapy protocol with randomisation (1:1) into placebo or AT‐005 groups. Response was evaluated via the Veterinary Cooperative Oncology Group criteria for canine lymphoma. RESULTS: Forty‐nine dogs were enrolled (25 received placebo and 24 received AT‐005). Most demographic factors were similar between the two groups, with the exception that more dogs with stage IV and V disease were treated with AT‐005 (34% vs. 8%; p = 0.03). Median PFS was 103 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 56–118) in the placebo group versus 64 days (95% CI, 36–118) in the AT‐005 group. The overall response rate (ORR) for all dogs was 98% (48 of 49); complete response rate in the placebo group (64%) was not different from the AT‐005 group (67%). CONCLUSIONS: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first prospective study to document that treatment with L‐CHOP chemotherapy, with or without AT‐005, may result in a high ORR, but relatively brief PFS in dogs with clinical intermediate‐ and high‐grade T‐cell lymphoma. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624070/ /pubmed/36329876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Veterinary Record Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Veterinary Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Musser, Margaret L. Clifford, Craig A. Bergman, Philip J. Treml, Laura S. McAnulty, Lydia C. Cook McNiel, Elizabeth A. Johannes, Chad M. Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title | Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title_full | Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title_fullStr | Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title_short | Randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine T‐cell lymphoma: A multicentre US study |
title_sort | randomised trial evaluating chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy and a novel monoclonal antibody for canine t‐cell lymphoma: a multicentre us study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/vro2.49 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mussermargaretl randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT cliffordcraiga randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT bergmanphilipj randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT tremllauras randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT mcanultylydiaccook randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT mcnielelizabetha randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy AT johanneschadm randomisedtrialevaluatingchemotherapyaloneorchemotherapyandanovelmonoclonalantibodyforcaninetcelllymphomaamulticentreusstudy |