Cargando…
Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan
OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy surveillance reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer through the detection and endoscopic removal of adenomas. Current guidelines recommend that patients with Lynch syndrome should have colonoscopy surveillance every 1–2 years starting at the age of 20–25. However, insuffi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.179 |
_version_ | 1784822152663400448 |
---|---|
author | Miyakura, Yasuyuki Chino, Akiko Tanakaya, Kohji Lefor, Alan Kawarai Akagi, Kiwamu Takao, Akinari Yamada, Masayoshi Ishida, Hideyuki Komori, Koji Sasaki, Kazuhito Miguchi, Masashi Hirata, Keiji Sudo, Tomoya Ishikawa, Toshiaki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Tomita, Naohiro Ajioka, Yoichi |
author_facet | Miyakura, Yasuyuki Chino, Akiko Tanakaya, Kohji Lefor, Alan Kawarai Akagi, Kiwamu Takao, Akinari Yamada, Masayoshi Ishida, Hideyuki Komori, Koji Sasaki, Kazuhito Miguchi, Masashi Hirata, Keiji Sudo, Tomoya Ishikawa, Toshiaki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Tomita, Naohiro Ajioka, Yoichi |
author_sort | Miyakura, Yasuyuki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy surveillance reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer through the detection and endoscopic removal of adenomas. Current guidelines recommend that patients with Lynch syndrome should have colonoscopy surveillance every 1–2 years starting at the age of 20–25. However, insufficient data are available to evaluate the quality and safety of colonoscopy surveillance for patients with Lynch syndrome nationwide in Japan. METHODS: Patients with Lynch syndrome (n = 309) from 13 institutions who underwent one or more colonoscopy procedures were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Colonoscopy completion rate, colonoscopy‐related complication rate, proportion with an adequate colonoscopy interval, and adenoma detection rate were reviewed. RESULTS: The colonoscopy completion rate was 98.8% and a history of previous colorectal cancer surgery was significantly associated with a higher completion rate. All complications were associated with endoscopic treatment and the rate of bleeding needing hemostasis and perforation needing surgical repair were both 0.16% after colonoscopy with polypectomy. The adenoma detection rate at the first colonoscopy was 25%. Although there was no difference in the completion and complication rates based on differences in the colonoscopy experience of the endoscopist, the detection rate of adenomas and intramucosal cancers was significantly higher with more experienced endoscopists. The proportion of patients developing cancer was significantly higher with a >24 months than a ≤24 months interval. CONCLUSION: High‐volume experienced endoscopists and appropriate surveillance intervals may minimize the risk of developing colorectal cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96240712022-11-02 Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan Miyakura, Yasuyuki Chino, Akiko Tanakaya, Kohji Lefor, Alan Kawarai Akagi, Kiwamu Takao, Akinari Yamada, Masayoshi Ishida, Hideyuki Komori, Koji Sasaki, Kazuhito Miguchi, Masashi Hirata, Keiji Sudo, Tomoya Ishikawa, Toshiaki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Tomita, Naohiro Ajioka, Yoichi DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy surveillance reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer through the detection and endoscopic removal of adenomas. Current guidelines recommend that patients with Lynch syndrome should have colonoscopy surveillance every 1–2 years starting at the age of 20–25. However, insufficient data are available to evaluate the quality and safety of colonoscopy surveillance for patients with Lynch syndrome nationwide in Japan. METHODS: Patients with Lynch syndrome (n = 309) from 13 institutions who underwent one or more colonoscopy procedures were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Colonoscopy completion rate, colonoscopy‐related complication rate, proportion with an adequate colonoscopy interval, and adenoma detection rate were reviewed. RESULTS: The colonoscopy completion rate was 98.8% and a history of previous colorectal cancer surgery was significantly associated with a higher completion rate. All complications were associated with endoscopic treatment and the rate of bleeding needing hemostasis and perforation needing surgical repair were both 0.16% after colonoscopy with polypectomy. The adenoma detection rate at the first colonoscopy was 25%. Although there was no difference in the completion and complication rates based on differences in the colonoscopy experience of the endoscopist, the detection rate of adenomas and intramucosal cancers was significantly higher with more experienced endoscopists. The proportion of patients developing cancer was significantly higher with a >24 months than a ≤24 months interval. CONCLUSION: High‐volume experienced endoscopists and appropriate surveillance intervals may minimize the risk of developing colorectal cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624071/ /pubmed/36330234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.179 Text en © 2022 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Miyakura, Yasuyuki Chino, Akiko Tanakaya, Kohji Lefor, Alan Kawarai Akagi, Kiwamu Takao, Akinari Yamada, Masayoshi Ishida, Hideyuki Komori, Koji Sasaki, Kazuhito Miguchi, Masashi Hirata, Keiji Sudo, Tomoya Ishikawa, Toshiaki Yamaguchi, Tatsuro Tomita, Naohiro Ajioka, Yoichi Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title | Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title_full | Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title_fullStr | Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title_short | Current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan |
title_sort | current practice of colonoscopy surveillance in patients with lynch syndrome: a multicenter retrospective cohort study in japan |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miyakurayasuyuki currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT chinoakiko currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT tanakayakohji currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT leforalankawarai currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT akagikiwamu currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT takaoakinari currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT yamadamasayoshi currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT ishidahideyuki currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT komorikoji currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT sasakikazuhito currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT miguchimasashi currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT hiratakeiji currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT sudotomoya currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT ishikawatoshiaki currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT yamaguchitatsuro currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT tomitanaohiro currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan AT ajiokayoichi currentpracticeofcolonoscopysurveillanceinpatientswithlynchsyndromeamulticenterretrospectivecohortstudyinjapan |