Cargando…
Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy
BACKGROUND: Invasiveness is considered one of the cornerstones of every field of surgery, and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) approaches are now routinely used worldwide to perform pulmonary resections. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become the preferred technique in many...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005860 |
_version_ | 1784822163897843712 |
---|---|
author | Mercadante, Edoardo Martucci, Nicola De Luca, Giuseppe La Rocca, Antonello La Manna, Carmine |
author_facet | Mercadante, Edoardo Martucci, Nicola De Luca, Giuseppe La Rocca, Antonello La Manna, Carmine |
author_sort | Mercadante, Edoardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Invasiveness is considered one of the cornerstones of every field of surgery, and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) approaches are now routinely used worldwide to perform pulmonary resections. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become the preferred technique in many centers; it is routinely performed using three or four ports with at least one service incision, contrasting with the real concept of invasiveness, especially when compared to uniportal VATS (U-VATS). Hereby, we present our early experience with uniportal RATS (U-RATS) pulmonary resections for early-stage lung cancer. Technical details of surgical steps are accurately described and commented on. RESULTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with lung cancer underwent U-RATS anatomical pulmonary resections at our institute. All procedures were completed with the uniportal approach. The mean operative time was 210 min (range 120–350); in the last 10 cases, the operative time was significantly reduced (180 min) compared to the first 10 cases (232 min) (p < 0.02), showing a very fast learning curve. The postoperative pain score was comparable to that for U-VATS and was constantly low. CONCLUSIONS: U-RATS is a safe and feasible technique, combining the advantages of U-VATS with the well-known advantages of robotic surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624124 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96241242022-11-02 Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy Mercadante, Edoardo Martucci, Nicola De Luca, Giuseppe La Rocca, Antonello La Manna, Carmine Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Invasiveness is considered one of the cornerstones of every field of surgery, and video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) approaches are now routinely used worldwide to perform pulmonary resections. Recently, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become the preferred technique in many centers; it is routinely performed using three or four ports with at least one service incision, contrasting with the real concept of invasiveness, especially when compared to uniportal VATS (U-VATS). Hereby, we present our early experience with uniportal RATS (U-RATS) pulmonary resections for early-stage lung cancer. Technical details of surgical steps are accurately described and commented on. RESULTS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with lung cancer underwent U-RATS anatomical pulmonary resections at our institute. All procedures were completed with the uniportal approach. The mean operative time was 210 min (range 120–350); in the last 10 cases, the operative time was significantly reduced (180 min) compared to the first 10 cases (232 min) (p < 0.02), showing a very fast learning curve. The postoperative pain score was comparable to that for U-VATS and was constantly low. CONCLUSIONS: U-RATS is a safe and feasible technique, combining the advantages of U-VATS with the well-known advantages of robotic surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9624124/ /pubmed/36329983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005860 Text en © 2022 Mercadante, Martucci, De Luca, La Rocca and La Manna. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Mercadante, Edoardo Martucci, Nicola De Luca, Giuseppe La Rocca, Antonello La Manna, Carmine Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title | Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title_full | Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title_fullStr | Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title_short | Early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
title_sort | early experience with uniportal robotic thoracic surgery lobectomy |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624124/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329983 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.1005860 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mercadanteedoardo earlyexperiencewithuniportalroboticthoracicsurgerylobectomy AT martuccinicola earlyexperiencewithuniportalroboticthoracicsurgerylobectomy AT delucagiuseppe earlyexperiencewithuniportalroboticthoracicsurgerylobectomy AT laroccaantonello earlyexperiencewithuniportalroboticthoracicsurgerylobectomy AT lamannacarmine earlyexperiencewithuniportalroboticthoracicsurgerylobectomy |