Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis
Objective: This review was performed to compare the efficacy and safety among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib and those who received tocilizumab independently with placebo or the standard of care (SOC). Methods: Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1004308 |
_version_ | 1784822175692226560 |
---|---|
author | Cherian, Jerin Jose Eerike, Madhavi Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Das, Saibal Panda, Samiran |
author_facet | Cherian, Jerin Jose Eerike, Madhavi Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Das, Saibal Panda, Samiran |
author_sort | Cherian, Jerin Jose |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This review was performed to compare the efficacy and safety among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib and those who received tocilizumab independently with placebo or the standard of care (SOC). Methods: Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of baricitinib or tocilizumab as compared to placebo or the SOC in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the 28-day mortality. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences were compared and pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. A two-staged exploratory network meta-analysis using a multivariate meta-analysis was also performed. All analyses were performed in Stata version 16.0. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of the generated evidence (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022323363). Results: Treatment with baricitinib [RR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50–0.94), p = 0.02, i(2) = 64.86%] but not with tocilizumab [RR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–1.07), p = 0.19, i(2) = 24.41%] led to a significant improvement in the 28-day mortality as compared to that with the SOC. Treatment with baricitinib or tocilizumab, both independently led to a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization [baricitinib: mean difference, −1.13 days (95% CI, −1.51 to −0.76), p < 0.001, i(2) = 0.00%; tocilizumab: mean difference, −2.80 days (95% CI, −4.17 to −1.43), p < 0.001, i(2) = 55.47%] and a significant improvement in the proportion of patients recovering clinically by day 28 [baricitinib: RR, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03–1.48), p = 0.02, i(2) = 27.20%; tocilizumab: RR, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.12–1.78), p < 0.001, i(2) = 34.59%] as compared to those with the SOC. From the safety point of view, both these drugs showed similar results. There were fewer patients who experienced any serious adverse event following treatment with barictinib and tocilizumab as compared to those following treatment with the SOC [baricitinib: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62–0.92), p = 0.01, i(2) = 12.63%; tocilizumab: RR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72–1.01), p = 0.07, i(2) = 0.00%]. Conclusion: As baricitinib and tocilizumab are recommended interchangeably by various guidelines for the management of COVID-19, considering the better 28-day mortality data and other comparable efficacy and safety outcomes, baricitinib may be favored over tocilizumab considering its ease of administration, shorter half-life, and lower cost of treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96241732022-11-02 Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis Cherian, Jerin Jose Eerike, Madhavi Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Das, Saibal Panda, Samiran Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Objective: This review was performed to compare the efficacy and safety among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 who received baricitinib and those who received tocilizumab independently with placebo or the standard of care (SOC). Methods: Relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials which evaluated the effect of baricitinib or tocilizumab as compared to placebo or the SOC in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the 28-day mortality. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences were compared and pooled for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively. A two-staged exploratory network meta-analysis using a multivariate meta-analysis was also performed. All analyses were performed in Stata version 16.0. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of the generated evidence (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022323363). Results: Treatment with baricitinib [RR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.50–0.94), p = 0.02, i(2) = 64.86%] but not with tocilizumab [RR, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.71–1.07), p = 0.19, i(2) = 24.41%] led to a significant improvement in the 28-day mortality as compared to that with the SOC. Treatment with baricitinib or tocilizumab, both independently led to a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization [baricitinib: mean difference, −1.13 days (95% CI, −1.51 to −0.76), p < 0.001, i(2) = 0.00%; tocilizumab: mean difference, −2.80 days (95% CI, −4.17 to −1.43), p < 0.001, i(2) = 55.47%] and a significant improvement in the proportion of patients recovering clinically by day 28 [baricitinib: RR, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.03–1.48), p = 0.02, i(2) = 27.20%; tocilizumab: RR, 1.41 (95% CI, 1.12–1.78), p < 0.001, i(2) = 34.59%] as compared to those with the SOC. From the safety point of view, both these drugs showed similar results. There were fewer patients who experienced any serious adverse event following treatment with barictinib and tocilizumab as compared to those following treatment with the SOC [baricitinib: RR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62–0.92), p = 0.01, i(2) = 12.63%; tocilizumab: RR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72–1.01), p = 0.07, i(2) = 0.00%]. Conclusion: As baricitinib and tocilizumab are recommended interchangeably by various guidelines for the management of COVID-19, considering the better 28-day mortality data and other comparable efficacy and safety outcomes, baricitinib may be favored over tocilizumab considering its ease of administration, shorter half-life, and lower cost of treatment. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9624173/ /pubmed/36330085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1004308 Text en Copyright © 2022 Cherian, Eerike, Bagepally, Das and Panda. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Pharmacology Cherian, Jerin Jose Eerike, Madhavi Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Das, Saibal Panda, Samiran Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of baricitinib and tocilizumab in hospitalized patients with covid-19: a comparison using systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Pharmacology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36330085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.1004308 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cherianjerinjose efficacyandsafetyofbaricitinibandtocilizumabinhospitalizedpatientswithcovid19acomparisonusingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT eerikemadhavi efficacyandsafetyofbaricitinibandtocilizumabinhospitalizedpatientswithcovid19acomparisonusingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bagepallybhavanishankara efficacyandsafetyofbaricitinibandtocilizumabinhospitalizedpatientswithcovid19acomparisonusingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dassaibal efficacyandsafetyofbaricitinibandtocilizumabinhospitalizedpatientswithcovid19acomparisonusingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pandasamiran efficacyandsafetyofbaricitinibandtocilizumabinhospitalizedpatientswithcovid19acomparisonusingsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |