Cargando…

Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) helps achieve good radiation dose conformity and precise dose evaluation. We conducted a single-centre prospective study to assess the safety and feasibility of total body irradiation with IMRT (IMRT-TBI) using helical tomothera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konishi, Tatsuya, Ogawa, Hiroaki, Najima, Yuho, Hashimoto, Shinpei, Kito, Satoshi, Atsuta, Yuya, Wada, Atsushi, Adachi, Hiroto, Konuma, Ryosuke, Kishida, Yuya, Nagata, Akihito, Yamada, Yuta, Kaito, Satoshi, Mukae, Junichi, Marumo, Atsushi, Noguchi, Yuma, Shingai, Naoki, Toya, Takashi, Igarashi, Aiko, Shimizu, Hiroaki, Kobayashi, Takeshi, Ohashi, Kazuteru, Doki, Noriko, Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2125171
_version_ 1784822191591784448
author Konishi, Tatsuya
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Najima, Yuho
Hashimoto, Shinpei
Kito, Satoshi
Atsuta, Yuya
Wada, Atsushi
Adachi, Hiroto
Konuma, Ryosuke
Kishida, Yuya
Nagata, Akihito
Yamada, Yuta
Kaito, Satoshi
Mukae, Junichi
Marumo, Atsushi
Noguchi, Yuma
Shingai, Naoki
Toya, Takashi
Igarashi, Aiko
Shimizu, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Ohashi, Kazuteru
Doki, Noriko
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
author_facet Konishi, Tatsuya
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Najima, Yuho
Hashimoto, Shinpei
Kito, Satoshi
Atsuta, Yuya
Wada, Atsushi
Adachi, Hiroto
Konuma, Ryosuke
Kishida, Yuya
Nagata, Akihito
Yamada, Yuta
Kaito, Satoshi
Mukae, Junichi
Marumo, Atsushi
Noguchi, Yuma
Shingai, Naoki
Toya, Takashi
Igarashi, Aiko
Shimizu, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Ohashi, Kazuteru
Doki, Noriko
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
author_sort Konishi, Tatsuya
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) helps achieve good radiation dose conformity and precise dose evaluation. We conducted a single-centre prospective study to assess the safety and feasibility of total body irradiation with IMRT (IMRT-TBI) using helical tomotherapy in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients with haematological malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [n = 21], chronic myeloid leukaemia [n = 6], mixed phenotype acute leukaemia [n = 5], acute myeloid leukaemia [n = 4], and malignant lymphoma [n = 3]) who received 12 Gy IMRT-TBI were enrolled with a median follow-up of 934.5 (range, 617–1254) d. At the time of transplantation, 33 patients (85%) achieved complete remission. The conditioning regimen used IMRT-TBI (12 Gy in 6 fractions twice daily, for 3 d) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d, for 2 d), seven patients were combined with cytarabine, and five with etoposide. We set dose constraints for the lungs, kidneys and lens as the organs at risk. RESULTS: The mean doses for the lungs and kidneys were 7.50 and 9.11 Gy, respectively. The mean maximum dose for the lens (right/left) was 5.75/5.87 Gy. The 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 69, 64, 18 and 18%, respectively. Thirty-six patients developed early adverse events (AEs) (including four patients with Grade 3/4 toxicities), most of which were reversible oral mucositis and may partially have been related to IMRT-TBI. However, the incidence of toxicity was comparable to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. None of the patients developed primary graft failure, or Grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In late complications, chronic kidney disease was observed in six patients, a lower incidence compared to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. No radiation pneumonitis or cataracts were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-TBI is safe and feasible for haematological malignancies with acceptable clinical outcomes. KEY MESSAGES: 1. IMRT-TBI-helical tomotherapy aids in accurate dose calculation and conformity. 2. It could be used without any considerable increase in the rate of TBI-related AEs. 3. Allo-HSCT with IMRT-TBI may be an alternative to conventional TBI for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96242562022-11-02 Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study Konishi, Tatsuya Ogawa, Hiroaki Najima, Yuho Hashimoto, Shinpei Kito, Satoshi Atsuta, Yuya Wada, Atsushi Adachi, Hiroto Konuma, Ryosuke Kishida, Yuya Nagata, Akihito Yamada, Yuta Kaito, Satoshi Mukae, Junichi Marumo, Atsushi Noguchi, Yuma Shingai, Naoki Toya, Takashi Igarashi, Aiko Shimizu, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Takeshi Ohashi, Kazuteru Doki, Noriko Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto Ann Med Hematology BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) helps achieve good radiation dose conformity and precise dose evaluation. We conducted a single-centre prospective study to assess the safety and feasibility of total body irradiation with IMRT (IMRT-TBI) using helical tomotherapy in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients with haematological malignancy (acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [n = 21], chronic myeloid leukaemia [n = 6], mixed phenotype acute leukaemia [n = 5], acute myeloid leukaemia [n = 4], and malignant lymphoma [n = 3]) who received 12 Gy IMRT-TBI were enrolled with a median follow-up of 934.5 (range, 617–1254) d. At the time of transplantation, 33 patients (85%) achieved complete remission. The conditioning regimen used IMRT-TBI (12 Gy in 6 fractions twice daily, for 3 d) and cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg/d, for 2 d), seven patients were combined with cytarabine, and five with etoposide. We set dose constraints for the lungs, kidneys and lens as the organs at risk. RESULTS: The mean doses for the lungs and kidneys were 7.50 and 9.11 Gy, respectively. The mean maximum dose for the lens (right/left) was 5.75/5.87 Gy. The 2-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 69, 64, 18 and 18%, respectively. Thirty-six patients developed early adverse events (AEs) (including four patients with Grade 3/4 toxicities), most of which were reversible oral mucositis and may partially have been related to IMRT-TBI. However, the incidence of toxicity was comparable to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. None of the patients developed primary graft failure, or Grade III–IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). In late complications, chronic kidney disease was observed in six patients, a lower incidence compared to conventional TBI-based conditioning transplantation. No radiation pneumonitis or cataracts were observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: IMRT-TBI is safe and feasible for haematological malignancies with acceptable clinical outcomes. KEY MESSAGES: 1. IMRT-TBI-helical tomotherapy aids in accurate dose calculation and conformity. 2. It could be used without any considerable increase in the rate of TBI-related AEs. 3. Allo-HSCT with IMRT-TBI may be an alternative to conventional TBI for clinical use. Taylor & Francis 2022-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9624256/ /pubmed/36254468 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2125171 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hematology
Konishi, Tatsuya
Ogawa, Hiroaki
Najima, Yuho
Hashimoto, Shinpei
Kito, Satoshi
Atsuta, Yuya
Wada, Atsushi
Adachi, Hiroto
Konuma, Ryosuke
Kishida, Yuya
Nagata, Akihito
Yamada, Yuta
Kaito, Satoshi
Mukae, Junichi
Marumo, Atsushi
Noguchi, Yuma
Shingai, Naoki
Toya, Takashi
Igarashi, Aiko
Shimizu, Hiroaki
Kobayashi, Takeshi
Ohashi, Kazuteru
Doki, Noriko
Murofushi, Keiko Nemoto
Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title_full Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title_fullStr Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title_short Outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
title_sort outcomes of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation with intensity-modulated total body irradiation by helical tomotherapy: a 2-year prospective follow-up study
topic Hematology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36254468
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2022.2125171
work_keys_str_mv AT konishitatsuya outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT ogawahiroaki outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT najimayuho outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT hashimotoshinpei outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT kitosatoshi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT atsutayuya outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT wadaatsushi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT adachihiroto outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT konumaryosuke outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT kishidayuya outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT nagataakihito outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT yamadayuta outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT kaitosatoshi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT mukaejunichi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT marumoatsushi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT noguchiyuma outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT shingainaoki outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT toyatakashi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT igarashiaiko outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT shimizuhiroaki outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT kobayashitakeshi outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT ohashikazuteru outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT dokinoriko outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy
AT murofushikeikonemoto outcomesofallogeneichaematopoieticstemcelltransplantationwithintensitymodulatedtotalbodyirradiationbyhelicaltomotherapya2yearprospectivefollowupstudy