Cargando…
A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals
Based on animal long-term and short-term memory radial foraging techniques (or LMRFT and SMRFT), we devise a modelling approach that could capture the foraging behaviours of animals. In this modelling, LMRFT-based optimal foraging paths and SMRFT-based ones are constructed with respect to different...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040078 |
_version_ | 1784822217991782400 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ray-Ming |
author_facet | Chen, Ray-Ming |
author_sort | Chen, Ray-Ming |
collection | PubMed |
description | Based on animal long-term and short-term memory radial foraging techniques (or LMRFT and SMRFT), we devise a modelling approach that could capture the foraging behaviours of animals. In this modelling, LMRFT-based optimal foraging paths and SMRFT-based ones are constructed with respect to different levels of foraging strategies. Then, by a devised structural metric, we calculate the structural distance between these modelled optimal paths and the hypothetical real foraging paths taken by agents. We sample 20 foods positions via a chosen bivariate normal distribution for three agents. Then, we calculate their Euclidean distance matrix and their ranked matrix. Using LMRFT-based or SMRFT-based optimal foraging strategies, the optimal foraging paths are created. Then, foraging strategies are identified using optimal parameter learning techniques. Our results, based on the simulated foraging data, show that LMRFT-based foraging strategies for agent 1,2 and 3 are 3, 2 and 5, i.e., agent 3 is the most intelligent one among the three in terms of radial level. However, from the SMRFT-based perspective of strategies, their optimal foraging strategies are 5,5 and 2, respectively, i.e., agent 1 is as intelligent as agent 2 and both of them have better SMRFT-based foraging strategies than agent 3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9624359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96243592022-11-02 A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals Chen, Ray-Ming J Intell Article Based on animal long-term and short-term memory radial foraging techniques (or LMRFT and SMRFT), we devise a modelling approach that could capture the foraging behaviours of animals. In this modelling, LMRFT-based optimal foraging paths and SMRFT-based ones are constructed with respect to different levels of foraging strategies. Then, by a devised structural metric, we calculate the structural distance between these modelled optimal paths and the hypothetical real foraging paths taken by agents. We sample 20 foods positions via a chosen bivariate normal distribution for three agents. Then, we calculate their Euclidean distance matrix and their ranked matrix. Using LMRFT-based or SMRFT-based optimal foraging strategies, the optimal foraging paths are created. Then, foraging strategies are identified using optimal parameter learning techniques. Our results, based on the simulated foraging data, show that LMRFT-based foraging strategies for agent 1,2 and 3 are 3, 2 and 5, i.e., agent 3 is the most intelligent one among the three in terms of radial level. However, from the SMRFT-based perspective of strategies, their optimal foraging strategies are 5,5 and 2, respectively, i.e., agent 1 is as intelligent as agent 2 and both of them have better SMRFT-based foraging strategies than agent 3. MDPI 2022-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9624359/ /pubmed/36278600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040078 Text en © 2022 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Ray-Ming A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title | A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title_full | A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title_fullStr | A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title_full_unstemmed | A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title_short | A Hypothetical Modelling and Experimental Design for Measuring Foraging Strategies of Animals |
title_sort | hypothetical modelling and experimental design for measuring foraging strategies of animals |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36278600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenrayming ahypotheticalmodellingandexperimentaldesignformeasuringforagingstrategiesofanimals AT chenrayming hypotheticalmodellingandexperimentaldesignformeasuringforagingstrategiesofanimals |