Cargando…

OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults

BACKGROUND: Body composition often changes with age. While body mass index (BMI) is used to define obesity, the degree to which BMI accurately or consistently reflects fatness in older versus younger adults remains unclear. Importantly, it is uncertain whether diabetes risk is similar for older vers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Egan, Josephine M, Ferrucci, Luigi, Kalyani, Rita R, Metter, E Jeffrey, Simonsick, Eleanor M, Walston, Jeremy D, Malandrino, Noemi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624583/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.036
_version_ 1784822266135052288
author Egan, Josephine M
Ferrucci, Luigi
Kalyani, Rita R
Metter, E Jeffrey
Simonsick, Eleanor M
Walston, Jeremy D
Malandrino, Noemi
author_facet Egan, Josephine M
Ferrucci, Luigi
Kalyani, Rita R
Metter, E Jeffrey
Simonsick, Eleanor M
Walston, Jeremy D
Malandrino, Noemi
author_sort Egan, Josephine M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Body composition often changes with age. While body mass index (BMI) is used to define obesity, the degree to which BMI accurately or consistently reflects fatness in older versus younger adults remains unclear. Importantly, it is uncertain whether diabetes risk is similar for older versus younger adults within BMI-defined categories. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the relationship of older (≥65 years) versus younger age (<65 years) to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived body composition measures and incident diabetes, stratified by BMI-defined categories for non-overweight/non-obese (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (≥30 kg/m2). Design: Participants without diabetes at first DXA visit in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging were included. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association of age categories to body composition at baseline, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the relationship of age categories to incident diabetes, within BMI categories for men and women. Diabetes was defined based on self-reported history, medication use, and/or ADA diagnostic criteria (fasting or 2-hour OGTT glucose levels). RESULTS: A total of 993 men (n=463 older, n=530 younger) and 1109 women (n=385 older, n=724 younger) were examined. Comparing older versus younger participants, body weight was significantly lower across all BMI categories for both men and women (all p<0.05). Percent total fat mass (%TFM) and fat mass/lean mass ratio (FM/LM) were significantly higher in older versus younger men across all BMI categories and in non-overweight/non-obese women. Among men, in multiple regression analyses adjusting for race, education, height and weight, the relationship (β±SE) of older versus younger age (reference) to %TFM remained significant (non-overweight/non-obese: 1.84±0.59, overweight: 2.60±0.47, obese: 1.81± 0.87; all p<0.05), as did the relationship to FM/LM, across all BMI categories. Among women, the relationships of older versus younger age (reference) to %TFM and FM/LM remained significant for non-overweight/non-obese women. Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years (IQR=1.9-16.6), there were 165 incident cases of diabetes. Older obese men had an almost three-fold higher risk of developing diabetes than younger obese men (HR=2.72 [95%CI: 1.12, 6.63]), accounting for race, education, height, weight and %TFM. Among women, no differences by age group in incident diabetes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, sex differences were observed in the relationship of older versus younger age to several measures of body composition, suggesting greater relative fat mass with aging, particularly in men. Further, our results suggest that BMI-defined categories for overweight and obesity do not fully account for changes in fat mass with aging and that the risk for diabetes is significantly greater for older compared to younger obese men. Further studies are needed to investigate the optimal BMI thresholds that predict diabetes risk in older adults. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:15 p.m. - 12:30 p.m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96245832022-11-14 OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults Egan, Josephine M Ferrucci, Luigi Kalyani, Rita R Metter, E Jeffrey Simonsick, Eleanor M Walston, Jeremy D Malandrino, Noemi J Endocr Soc Adipose Tissue, Appetite, & Obesity BACKGROUND: Body composition often changes with age. While body mass index (BMI) is used to define obesity, the degree to which BMI accurately or consistently reflects fatness in older versus younger adults remains unclear. Importantly, it is uncertain whether diabetes risk is similar for older versus younger adults within BMI-defined categories. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the relationship of older (≥65 years) versus younger age (<65 years) to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived body composition measures and incident diabetes, stratified by BMI-defined categories for non-overweight/non-obese (<25 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2) and obesity (≥30 kg/m2). Design: Participants without diabetes at first DXA visit in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging were included. Linear regression models were used to investigate the association of age categories to body composition at baseline, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to study the relationship of age categories to incident diabetes, within BMI categories for men and women. Diabetes was defined based on self-reported history, medication use, and/or ADA diagnostic criteria (fasting or 2-hour OGTT glucose levels). RESULTS: A total of 993 men (n=463 older, n=530 younger) and 1109 women (n=385 older, n=724 younger) were examined. Comparing older versus younger participants, body weight was significantly lower across all BMI categories for both men and women (all p<0.05). Percent total fat mass (%TFM) and fat mass/lean mass ratio (FM/LM) were significantly higher in older versus younger men across all BMI categories and in non-overweight/non-obese women. Among men, in multiple regression analyses adjusting for race, education, height and weight, the relationship (β±SE) of older versus younger age (reference) to %TFM remained significant (non-overweight/non-obese: 1.84±0.59, overweight: 2.60±0.47, obese: 1.81± 0.87; all p<0.05), as did the relationship to FM/LM, across all BMI categories. Among women, the relationships of older versus younger age (reference) to %TFM and FM/LM remained significant for non-overweight/non-obese women. Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years (IQR=1.9-16.6), there were 165 incident cases of diabetes. Older obese men had an almost three-fold higher risk of developing diabetes than younger obese men (HR=2.72 [95%CI: 1.12, 6.63]), accounting for race, education, height, weight and %TFM. Among women, no differences by age group in incident diabetes were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, sex differences were observed in the relationship of older versus younger age to several measures of body composition, suggesting greater relative fat mass with aging, particularly in men. Further, our results suggest that BMI-defined categories for overweight and obesity do not fully account for changes in fat mass with aging and that the risk for diabetes is significantly greater for older compared to younger obese men. Further studies are needed to investigate the optimal BMI thresholds that predict diabetes risk in older adults. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:15 p.m. - 12:30 p.m. Oxford University Press 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624583/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.036 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Adipose Tissue, Appetite, & Obesity
Egan, Josephine M
Ferrucci, Luigi
Kalyani, Rita R
Metter, E Jeffrey
Simonsick, Eleanor M
Walston, Jeremy D
Malandrino, Noemi
OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title_full OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title_fullStr OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title_full_unstemmed OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title_short OR10-6 Sex Differences in Body Composition and Incident Diabetes Across BMI Categories in Older Versus Younger Adults
title_sort or10-6 sex differences in body composition and incident diabetes across bmi categories in older versus younger adults
topic Adipose Tissue, Appetite, & Obesity
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624583/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.036
work_keys_str_mv AT eganjosephinem or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT ferrucciluigi or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT kalyaniritar or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT metterejeffrey or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT simonsickeleanorm or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT walstonjeremyd or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults
AT malandrinonoemi or106sexdifferencesinbodycompositionandincidentdiabetesacrossbmicategoriesinolderversusyoungeradults