Cargando…

LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment

OBJECTIVES: Foot care is an essential component of diabetes care. We explored patient barriers to proper foot care in a disadvantaged population using surveys of patient perceptions on barriers and self-care. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an outpatient diabetes clinic at a safety-net hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanco, Gerardo, Chirumamilla, Siri, Rashied, Ammar, Schechter, Marcos Coutinho, Fayfam, Maya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624618/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.609
_version_ 1784822275664510976
author Blanco, Gerardo
Chirumamilla, Siri
Rashied, Ammar
Schechter, Marcos Coutinho
Fayfam, Maya
author_facet Blanco, Gerardo
Chirumamilla, Siri
Rashied, Ammar
Schechter, Marcos Coutinho
Fayfam, Maya
author_sort Blanco, Gerardo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Foot care is an essential component of diabetes care. We explored patient barriers to proper foot care in a disadvantaged population using surveys of patient perceptions on barriers and self-care. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an outpatient diabetes clinic at a safety-net hospital in Atlanta, Georgia from October 2021- January 2022 and stratified into two groups: 1) Complications defined as patient reported foot pain, history of foot ulcer or amputation and 2) No Complications defined as diabetes and no foot complications. A sample of 60 consecutive patients completed the surveys. The survey addressed patients’ experience in daily foot care and barriers to care. Survey data was supplemented by medical history information obtained from medical records. Based on the questions, a composite score was created for delay in care and missed appointments due to transportation challenges. Logistic regressions were utilized to perform univariate and multivariate assessments of delay in care and foot complications with stepwise adjustments for race, gender, age, employment, and education. RESULTS: Of the 60 participants, 41 (82%) had no reported foot complications and 11 (18%) reported foot complications. As compared to those without foot complication, those who had foot complications tended to be older (56.8 ± 10.2 years vs 60.4 ± 12.4), more often male (80% vs 40%), Black race (72% vs 94%), have diabetes for >10 years (63% vs 37%) and be retired/unemployed (27%/27% vs 37%/30%). Those with complications tended to have lower education level (high school/GED education level (55% vs 43%) and lower employment status (37% vs 4%). Those with complications were more likely to have discussion regarding foot care with their health care provider (91% vs 74%) and less likely to miss an appointment due to transportation challenges (81% vs 49%). Those with complications were less likely to report the composite of delay in care or missed appointments (18% vs 59%). In the unadjusted regression model, delayed care was associated with 0.153 odds of having had foot related complications as compared to no complication (Confidence interval: 0. 03, 0.786). After adjusting for demographics age, race, and gender the likelihood of delayed care was 0.117 (CI: 0. 013, 1. 031) for those with complications as compared to those without complications. In the fully adjusted model, adjusting for demographics, education and employment status, the odds of delayed care was 0. 064 for those with complications as compared to those without (CI: 0. 004, 1. 003). CONCLUSION: Based on our survey, transportation was identified as a barrier to access foot care. People without a history of foot complications were more likely to have delays in care and missed appointments. Avenues to improve access, especially early in the disease course, should be further explored within this patient population to assist with improving foot care. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96246182022-11-14 LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment Blanco, Gerardo Chirumamilla, Siri Rashied, Ammar Schechter, Marcos Coutinho Fayfam, Maya J Endocr Soc Diabetes & Glucose Metabolism OBJECTIVES: Foot care is an essential component of diabetes care. We explored patient barriers to proper foot care in a disadvantaged population using surveys of patient perceptions on barriers and self-care. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an outpatient diabetes clinic at a safety-net hospital in Atlanta, Georgia from October 2021- January 2022 and stratified into two groups: 1) Complications defined as patient reported foot pain, history of foot ulcer or amputation and 2) No Complications defined as diabetes and no foot complications. A sample of 60 consecutive patients completed the surveys. The survey addressed patients’ experience in daily foot care and barriers to care. Survey data was supplemented by medical history information obtained from medical records. Based on the questions, a composite score was created for delay in care and missed appointments due to transportation challenges. Logistic regressions were utilized to perform univariate and multivariate assessments of delay in care and foot complications with stepwise adjustments for race, gender, age, employment, and education. RESULTS: Of the 60 participants, 41 (82%) had no reported foot complications and 11 (18%) reported foot complications. As compared to those without foot complication, those who had foot complications tended to be older (56.8 ± 10.2 years vs 60.4 ± 12.4), more often male (80% vs 40%), Black race (72% vs 94%), have diabetes for >10 years (63% vs 37%) and be retired/unemployed (27%/27% vs 37%/30%). Those with complications tended to have lower education level (high school/GED education level (55% vs 43%) and lower employment status (37% vs 4%). Those with complications were more likely to have discussion regarding foot care with their health care provider (91% vs 74%) and less likely to miss an appointment due to transportation challenges (81% vs 49%). Those with complications were less likely to report the composite of delay in care or missed appointments (18% vs 59%). In the unadjusted regression model, delayed care was associated with 0.153 odds of having had foot related complications as compared to no complication (Confidence interval: 0. 03, 0.786). After adjusting for demographics age, race, and gender the likelihood of delayed care was 0.117 (CI: 0. 013, 1. 031) for those with complications as compared to those without complications. In the fully adjusted model, adjusting for demographics, education and employment status, the odds of delayed care was 0. 064 for those with complications as compared to those without (CI: 0. 004, 1. 003). CONCLUSION: Based on our survey, transportation was identified as a barrier to access foot care. People without a history of foot complications were more likely to have delays in care and missed appointments. Avenues to improve access, especially early in the disease course, should be further explored within this patient population to assist with improving foot care. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Oxford University Press 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624618/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.609 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Diabetes & Glucose Metabolism
Blanco, Gerardo
Chirumamilla, Siri
Rashied, Ammar
Schechter, Marcos Coutinho
Fayfam, Maya
LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title_full LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title_fullStr LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title_full_unstemmed LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title_short LBSUN321 Development And Pilot Testing Of Barriers To Diabetic Foot Care With A Qualitative Assessment
title_sort lbsun321 development and pilot testing of barriers to diabetic foot care with a qualitative assessment
topic Diabetes & Glucose Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624618/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.609
work_keys_str_mv AT blancogerardo lbsun321developmentandpilottestingofbarrierstodiabeticfootcarewithaqualitativeassessment
AT chirumamillasiri lbsun321developmentandpilottestingofbarrierstodiabeticfootcarewithaqualitativeassessment
AT rashiedammar lbsun321developmentandpilottestingofbarrierstodiabeticfootcarewithaqualitativeassessment
AT schechtermarcoscoutinho lbsun321developmentandpilottestingofbarrierstodiabeticfootcarewithaqualitativeassessment
AT fayfammaya lbsun321developmentandpilottestingofbarrierstodiabeticfootcarewithaqualitativeassessment