Cargando…

PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is increasing, with pressure on healthcare systems. While earlier guidelines recommended repeat endocrine testing to ensure stability, the recent European guidelines suggest that is not necessary if initial tests were reassuring. AIM: To explo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wachira, Lianne, Fryer, Antony, George, Cherian, Clark, Alex, Sathiavageeswaran, Mahesh, Powner, Gill, Lea, Simon, Kempson, Wayne, Waldron, Julian, Golash, Anurag, Issa, Basil, Hanna, Prof Fahmy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624681/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.259
_version_ 1784822293228158976
author Wachira, Lianne
Fryer, Antony
George, Cherian
Clark, Alex
Sathiavageeswaran, Mahesh
Powner, Gill
Lea, Simon
Kempson, Wayne
Waldron, Julian
Golash, Anurag
Issa, Basil
Hanna, Prof Fahmy
author_facet Wachira, Lianne
Fryer, Antony
George, Cherian
Clark, Alex
Sathiavageeswaran, Mahesh
Powner, Gill
Lea, Simon
Kempson, Wayne
Waldron, Julian
Golash, Anurag
Issa, Basil
Hanna, Prof Fahmy
author_sort Wachira, Lianne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is increasing, with pressure on healthcare systems. While earlier guidelines recommended repeat endocrine testing to ensure stability, the recent European guidelines suggest that is not necessary if initial tests were reassuring. AIM: To explore the utility of this guidance on repeat endocrine testing of AI. METHODS: Retrospective unselected review of AI cases reviewed before the European guidelines, based on local protocol (baseline overnight dexaethasone suppression test [ONDST] and plasma metanephrines +/- aldosterone: renin ratio [ARR] if hypertension or hypokalemia were present). At two years, the endocrine tests were repeated. We compared the baseline with the two-year follow-up data. RESULTS: We collected data on 54 patients initially identified (2011-2016). Post-ONDST cortisol (nmol/L): At baseline, 37/52 (71.1%), 12/52 (23.1%) and 3/52 (5.8%) had values <50, 51-138 and >138 respectively. After 2 years, 20/28 (71.4%) had results of <50, of which 18 were originally <50 and 2 were 51-138. The remaining 8 had values of 51-138, of which 6 had values of <50 at baseline and the other 2 had values of 51-138. Where there appeared some discordance, analysis of agreement (kappa statistics) showed an agreement of 71% (P=0.153). Wilcoxon signed-rank test to explore changes in the raw cortisol values showed that there was no significant difference (P=0.281). ARR: Data was available data on 40 patients, all of whom had normal ARR results. At 2 years there were data on 25 cases, 19 of which also had baseline values, while 6 had 2-year values but no baseline data. In all cases, 2-year ARR values were normal. Plasma metanephrines: Metanephrine: Data was available at baseline on 43 patients, with 8 (18.6%) having values above the reference range (>0.33 nmol/L). Of these 8, 7 had values between 0.33 and 0.46, with the remaining one having a single markedly raised value at 206.8 nmol/L. At 2 years, we had data on 23 of these 43 patients, out of whom 20 had normal levels at both baseline and 2 years, 2 had abnormal results at baseline but normal at 2 years and one normal baseline value but slightly raised (0.36 nmol/L) at two years, with normal normetanephrines (0.33 nmol/L). Normetanephrine: Of the 43 cases with baseline results, only one was abnormal at 802 nmol/L (the same patient with a plasma metanephrine of 206.8 nmol/L). In this case, the normetanephrine became unremarkable after 2 years indicative of successful surgery. The remaining 22 cases with data at 2 years all had values within the reference range. CONCLUSION: There was no significant change in function after two-year follow up, as defined by abnormal endocrine test results. Therefore, our findings support the European guidelines advice that repeat testing is not warranted. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9624681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96246812022-11-14 PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted? Wachira, Lianne Fryer, Antony George, Cherian Clark, Alex Sathiavageeswaran, Mahesh Powner, Gill Lea, Simon Kempson, Wayne Waldron, Julian Golash, Anurag Issa, Basil Hanna, Prof Fahmy J Endocr Soc Adrenal BACKGROUND: The prevalence of adrenal incidentaloma (AI) is increasing, with pressure on healthcare systems. While earlier guidelines recommended repeat endocrine testing to ensure stability, the recent European guidelines suggest that is not necessary if initial tests were reassuring. AIM: To explore the utility of this guidance on repeat endocrine testing of AI. METHODS: Retrospective unselected review of AI cases reviewed before the European guidelines, based on local protocol (baseline overnight dexaethasone suppression test [ONDST] and plasma metanephrines +/- aldosterone: renin ratio [ARR] if hypertension or hypokalemia were present). At two years, the endocrine tests were repeated. We compared the baseline with the two-year follow-up data. RESULTS: We collected data on 54 patients initially identified (2011-2016). Post-ONDST cortisol (nmol/L): At baseline, 37/52 (71.1%), 12/52 (23.1%) and 3/52 (5.8%) had values <50, 51-138 and >138 respectively. After 2 years, 20/28 (71.4%) had results of <50, of which 18 were originally <50 and 2 were 51-138. The remaining 8 had values of 51-138, of which 6 had values of <50 at baseline and the other 2 had values of 51-138. Where there appeared some discordance, analysis of agreement (kappa statistics) showed an agreement of 71% (P=0.153). Wilcoxon signed-rank test to explore changes in the raw cortisol values showed that there was no significant difference (P=0.281). ARR: Data was available data on 40 patients, all of whom had normal ARR results. At 2 years there were data on 25 cases, 19 of which also had baseline values, while 6 had 2-year values but no baseline data. In all cases, 2-year ARR values were normal. Plasma metanephrines: Metanephrine: Data was available at baseline on 43 patients, with 8 (18.6%) having values above the reference range (>0.33 nmol/L). Of these 8, 7 had values between 0.33 and 0.46, with the remaining one having a single markedly raised value at 206.8 nmol/L. At 2 years, we had data on 23 of these 43 patients, out of whom 20 had normal levels at both baseline and 2 years, 2 had abnormal results at baseline but normal at 2 years and one normal baseline value but slightly raised (0.36 nmol/L) at two years, with normal normetanephrines (0.33 nmol/L). Normetanephrine: Of the 43 cases with baseline results, only one was abnormal at 802 nmol/L (the same patient with a plasma metanephrine of 206.8 nmol/L). In this case, the normetanephrine became unremarkable after 2 years indicative of successful surgery. The remaining 22 cases with data at 2 years all had values within the reference range. CONCLUSION: There was no significant change in function after two-year follow up, as defined by abnormal endocrine test results. Therefore, our findings support the European guidelines advice that repeat testing is not warranted. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Oxford University Press 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9624681/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.259 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Adrenal
Wachira, Lianne
Fryer, Antony
George, Cherian
Clark, Alex
Sathiavageeswaran, Mahesh
Powner, Gill
Lea, Simon
Kempson, Wayne
Waldron, Julian
Golash, Anurag
Issa, Basil
Hanna, Prof Fahmy
PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title_full PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title_fullStr PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title_full_unstemmed PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title_short PSUN25 Adrenal Incidentaloma: Is Interval Hormone Testing Warranted?
title_sort psun25 adrenal incidentaloma: is interval hormone testing warranted?
topic Adrenal
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9624681/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.259
work_keys_str_mv AT wachiralianne psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT fryerantony psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT georgecherian psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT clarkalex psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT sathiavageeswaranmahesh psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT pownergill psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT leasimon psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT kempsonwayne psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT waldronjulian psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT golashanurag psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT issabasil psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted
AT hannaproffahmy psun25adrenalincidentalomaisintervalhormonetestingwarranted