PSUN181 Diabetes-related outcomes following use of basal-bolus insulin vs. premixed insulin in a VA population with Type 2 diabetes: A retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) with basal bolus insulin analogs (BB) requires up to five injections a day. The complexity of BB therapy may adversely influence patient compliance. A simpler and cheaper regimen with premixed insulin (PM) typically involves two injections a day but is perceived to be less effective in managing DM. The purpose of this research project was to compare DM-related outcomes between BB regimens (insulin detemir or glargine plus aspart, lispro or regular insulin) and PM insulin regimens (70/30 insulin NPH/regular) among our veteran population with type 2 DM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review that included 140 veterans (70 in BB group and 70 in PM group) with type2 DM. Subjects aged 18 years or above and those having A1C level ≥ 8% were included. Subjects with type 1 diabetes or who switched their insulin regimen during the follow-up period were excluded. The included subjects were followed for a year, after the start of respective insulin therapies to examine change in A1c (primary outcome) levels across groups. Data were analyzed using Chi-square/Fisher exact tests and logistic regression. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 27 and SAS9.4. RESULTS: Out of 140 enrolled subjects, 94% were males with average age of 65.7 ± 10.1 years and DM duration of 12.9±9 years. There was no significant difference in age, gender, baseline A1c, BMI or duration of DM between the two groups. Following treatment initiation, there was no statistically significant difference between the BB and PM insulin groups for change in A1c (-1.9±1.8 vs -2.1±1.9%, p = 0.3) or for the rate of hypoglycemia (30% vs 21.4%, p = 0.3) respectively. Although the average BMI increased in both groups, the change was similar for both BB and PM groups (0.84±3.1 vs 0.4±2.2 kg/m2 respectively, p = 0.2). A logistic regression controlling for the confounders of hypoglycemia, found that the type of insulin used did not predict the development of hypoglycemia [OR 0.594, (0.251, 1.404)]. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in A1c change, rate of hypoglycemia, and change in body mass index in patients treated with either BB or PM insulin among our study population. These results suggest that PM insulin is equally effective as the BB and its use can potentially improve patient compliance and reduce the cost of care. Presentation: Sunday, June 12, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.