Cargando…

Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes

Exosomes are membrane-bound nanovesicles released by cells into their extracellular environment. They carry different types of RNA including mRNA which may be useful in the diagnosis of various diseases. Exosome isolation has been a challenge because of their small size; therefore, two exosome isola...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aziz, Mohammad A., Seo, Benedict, Hussaini, Haizal M., Hibma, Merilyn, Rich, Alison M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8648373
_version_ 1784822685898899456
author Aziz, Mohammad A.
Seo, Benedict
Hussaini, Haizal M.
Hibma, Merilyn
Rich, Alison M.
author_facet Aziz, Mohammad A.
Seo, Benedict
Hussaini, Haizal M.
Hibma, Merilyn
Rich, Alison M.
author_sort Aziz, Mohammad A.
collection PubMed
description Exosomes are membrane-bound nanovesicles released by cells into their extracellular environment. They carry different types of RNA including mRNA which may be useful in the diagnosis of various diseases. Exosome isolation has been a challenge because of their small size; therefore, two exosome isolation methods were compared in this study. The Exoquick-TC PLUS™ exosome isolation kit (kit) was compared with the classic ultracentrifugation (UC) method for exosome isolation. In samples obtained using both methods, cryo-electron microscopy showed round or slightly elongated vesicles with diameters ranging from 50 to 150 nm and delimited by a bilayered membrane. Dynamic light scattering resulted in multiple peaks for kit exosomes, whereas a single peak was observed for UC exosomes. Significantly, more total RNA was present in UC exosomes in contrast to kit exosomes (P < 0.0001). This was reflected in subsequent mRNA analysis using qPCR, where UC exosomes had lower Ct values compared to kit exosomes. In conclusion, exosome characterization revealed the presence of exosomes in both UC and the kit samples. The kit samples presented additional peaks from DLS which might be due to impurities. Overall, due to a higher total RNA and mRNA content, UC is a better option for subsequent mRNA analysis; nevertheless, the kit can still be used if an ultracentrifuge is not available as four out of the five genes selected were detected and quantified using the kit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96262112022-11-02 Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes Aziz, Mohammad A. Seo, Benedict Hussaini, Haizal M. Hibma, Merilyn Rich, Alison M. J Nucleic Acids Research Article Exosomes are membrane-bound nanovesicles released by cells into their extracellular environment. They carry different types of RNA including mRNA which may be useful in the diagnosis of various diseases. Exosome isolation has been a challenge because of their small size; therefore, two exosome isolation methods were compared in this study. The Exoquick-TC PLUS™ exosome isolation kit (kit) was compared with the classic ultracentrifugation (UC) method for exosome isolation. In samples obtained using both methods, cryo-electron microscopy showed round or slightly elongated vesicles with diameters ranging from 50 to 150 nm and delimited by a bilayered membrane. Dynamic light scattering resulted in multiple peaks for kit exosomes, whereas a single peak was observed for UC exosomes. Significantly, more total RNA was present in UC exosomes in contrast to kit exosomes (P < 0.0001). This was reflected in subsequent mRNA analysis using qPCR, where UC exosomes had lower Ct values compared to kit exosomes. In conclusion, exosome characterization revealed the presence of exosomes in both UC and the kit samples. The kit samples presented additional peaks from DLS which might be due to impurities. Overall, due to a higher total RNA and mRNA content, UC is a better option for subsequent mRNA analysis; nevertheless, the kit can still be used if an ultracentrifuge is not available as four out of the five genes selected were detected and quantified using the kit. Hindawi 2022-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9626211/ /pubmed/36329709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8648373 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mohammad A. Aziz et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aziz, Mohammad A.
Seo, Benedict
Hussaini, Haizal M.
Hibma, Merilyn
Rich, Alison M.
Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title_full Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title_fullStr Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title_short Comparing Two Methods for the Isolation of Exosomes
title_sort comparing two methods for the isolation of exosomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329709
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8648373
work_keys_str_mv AT azizmohammada comparingtwomethodsfortheisolationofexosomes
AT seobenedict comparingtwomethodsfortheisolationofexosomes
AT hussainihaizalm comparingtwomethodsfortheisolationofexosomes
AT hibmamerilyn comparingtwomethodsfortheisolationofexosomes
AT richalisonm comparingtwomethodsfortheisolationofexosomes