Cargando…

Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions

PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis (CTTA) for predicting the histopathological differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and to compare non-contrast-enhanced CTTA texture features between primary PDAC and hepatic metastases of PDAC. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janisch, Michael, Adelsmayr, Gabriel, Müller, Heimo, Holzinger, Andreas, Janek, Elmar, Talakic, Emina, Fuchsjäger, Michael, Schöllnast, Helmut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03646-7
_version_ 1784822727515832320
author Janisch, Michael
Adelsmayr, Gabriel
Müller, Heimo
Holzinger, Andreas
Janek, Elmar
Talakic, Emina
Fuchsjäger, Michael
Schöllnast, Helmut
author_facet Janisch, Michael
Adelsmayr, Gabriel
Müller, Heimo
Holzinger, Andreas
Janek, Elmar
Talakic, Emina
Fuchsjäger, Michael
Schöllnast, Helmut
author_sort Janisch, Michael
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis (CTTA) for predicting the histopathological differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and to compare non-contrast-enhanced CTTA texture features between primary PDAC and hepatic metastases of PDAC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 120 patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC. Sixty-five patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of primary PDAC, while 55 patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of hepatic PDAC metastasis. All lesions were segmented in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans for CTTA based on histogram analysis, co-occurrence matrix, and run-length matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted for 372 texture features using Mann–Whitney U test, Bonferroni–Holm correction, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three features were identified that differed significantly between histopathological G2 and G3 primary tumors. Of these, “low gray-level zone emphasis” yielded the largest AUC (0.87 ± 0.04), reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.83, respectively, when a cut-off value of 0.482 was applied. Fifty-four features differed significantly between primary and hepatic metastatic PDAC. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast-enhanced CTTA of PDAC identified differences in texture features between primary G2 and G3 tumors that could be used for non-invasive tumor assessment. Extensive differences between the features of primary and metastatic PDAC on CTTA suggest differences in tumor microenvironment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96264212022-11-03 Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions Janisch, Michael Adelsmayr, Gabriel Müller, Heimo Holzinger, Andreas Janek, Elmar Talakic, Emina Fuchsjäger, Michael Schöllnast, Helmut Abdom Radiol (NY) Pancreas PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility of non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis (CTTA) for predicting the histopathological differentiation of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and to compare non-contrast-enhanced CTTA texture features between primary PDAC and hepatic metastases of PDAC. METHODS: This retrospective study included 120 patients with histopathologically confirmed PDAC. Sixty-five patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of primary PDAC, while 55 patients underwent CT-guided biopsy of hepatic PDAC metastasis. All lesions were segmented in non-contrast-enhanced CT scans for CTTA based on histogram analysis, co-occurrence matrix, and run-length matrix. Statistical analysis was conducted for 372 texture features using Mann–Whitney U test, Bonferroni–Holm correction, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Three features were identified that differed significantly between histopathological G2 and G3 primary tumors. Of these, “low gray-level zone emphasis” yielded the largest AUC (0.87 ± 0.04), reaching a sensitivity and specificity of 0.76 and 0.83, respectively, when a cut-off value of 0.482 was applied. Fifty-four features differed significantly between primary and hepatic metastatic PDAC. CONCLUSION: Non-contrast-enhanced CTTA of PDAC identified differences in texture features between primary G2 and G3 tumors that could be used for non-invasive tumor assessment. Extensive differences between the features of primary and metastatic PDAC on CTTA suggest differences in tumor microenvironment. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer US 2022-09-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9626421/ /pubmed/36104481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03646-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Pancreas
Janisch, Michael
Adelsmayr, Gabriel
Müller, Heimo
Holzinger, Andreas
Janek, Elmar
Talakic, Emina
Fuchsjäger, Michael
Schöllnast, Helmut
Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title_full Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title_fullStr Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title_short Non-contrast-enhanced CT texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
title_sort non-contrast-enhanced ct texture analysis of primary and metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: value in assessment of histopathological grade and differences between primary and metastatic lesions
topic Pancreas
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03646-7
work_keys_str_mv AT janischmichael noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT adelsmayrgabriel noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT mullerheimo noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT holzingerandreas noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT janekelmar noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT talakicemina noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT fuchsjagermichael noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions
AT schollnasthelmut noncontrastenhancedcttextureanalysisofprimaryandmetastaticpancreaticductaladenocarcinomasvalueinassessmentofhistopathologicalgradeanddifferencesbetweenprimaryandmetastaticlesions