Cargando…
Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is complex, and better approaches are required to predict survival and need for advanced therapies. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to use machine learning to characterize multidimensional CRT response and its relationship with long-term surv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.06.005 |
_version_ | 1784822799403057152 |
---|---|
author | Bivona, Derek J. Tallavajhala, Srikar Abdi, Mohamad Oomen, Pim J.A. Gao, Xu Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew E. Monfredi, Oliver J. Mangrum, J. Michael Mason, Pamela K. Mazimba, Sula Salerno, Michael Kramer, Christopher M. Epstein, Frederick H. Holmes, Jeffrey W. Bilchick, Kenneth C. |
author_facet | Bivona, Derek J. Tallavajhala, Srikar Abdi, Mohamad Oomen, Pim J.A. Gao, Xu Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew E. Monfredi, Oliver J. Mangrum, J. Michael Mason, Pamela K. Mazimba, Sula Salerno, Michael Kramer, Christopher M. Epstein, Frederick H. Holmes, Jeffrey W. Bilchick, Kenneth C. |
author_sort | Bivona, Derek J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is complex, and better approaches are required to predict survival and need for advanced therapies. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to use machine learning to characterize multidimensional CRT response and its relationship with long-term survival. METHODS: Associations of 39 baseline features (including cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR] findings and clinical parameters such as glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) with a multidimensional CRT response vector (consisting of post-CRT left ventricular end-systolic volume index [LVESVI] fractional change, post-CRT B-type natriuretic peptide, and change in peak VO(2)) were evaluated. Machine learning generated response clusters, and cross-validation assessed associations of clusters with 4-year survival. RESULTS: Among 200 patients (median age 67.4 years, 27.0% women) with CRT and CMR, associations with more than 1 response parameter were noted for the CMR CURE-SVD dyssynchrony parameter (associated with post-CRT brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] and LVESVI fractional change) and GFR (associated with peak VO(2) and post-CRT BNP). Machine learning defined 3 response clusters: cluster 1 (n = 123, 90.2% survival [best]), cluster 2 (n = 45, 60.0% survival [intermediate]), and cluster 3 (n = 32, 34.4% survival [worst]). Adding the 6-month response cluster to baseline features improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 4-year survival from 0.78 to 0.86 (P = .02). A web-based application was developed for cluster determination in future patients. CONCLUSION: Machine learning characterizes distinct CRT response clusters influenced by CMR features, kidney function, and other factors. These clusters have a strong and additive influence on long-term survival relative to baseline features. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9626744 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96267442022-11-03 Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance Bivona, Derek J. Tallavajhala, Srikar Abdi, Mohamad Oomen, Pim J.A. Gao, Xu Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew E. Monfredi, Oliver J. Mangrum, J. Michael Mason, Pamela K. Mazimba, Sula Salerno, Michael Kramer, Christopher M. Epstein, Frederick H. Holmes, Jeffrey W. Bilchick, Kenneth C. Heart Rhythm O2 Clinical BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response is complex, and better approaches are required to predict survival and need for advanced therapies. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to use machine learning to characterize multidimensional CRT response and its relationship with long-term survival. METHODS: Associations of 39 baseline features (including cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR] findings and clinical parameters such as glomerular filtration rate [GFR]) with a multidimensional CRT response vector (consisting of post-CRT left ventricular end-systolic volume index [LVESVI] fractional change, post-CRT B-type natriuretic peptide, and change in peak VO(2)) were evaluated. Machine learning generated response clusters, and cross-validation assessed associations of clusters with 4-year survival. RESULTS: Among 200 patients (median age 67.4 years, 27.0% women) with CRT and CMR, associations with more than 1 response parameter were noted for the CMR CURE-SVD dyssynchrony parameter (associated with post-CRT brain natriuretic peptide [BNP] and LVESVI fractional change) and GFR (associated with peak VO(2) and post-CRT BNP). Machine learning defined 3 response clusters: cluster 1 (n = 123, 90.2% survival [best]), cluster 2 (n = 45, 60.0% survival [intermediate]), and cluster 3 (n = 32, 34.4% survival [worst]). Adding the 6-month response cluster to baseline features improved the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 4-year survival from 0.78 to 0.86 (P = .02). A web-based application was developed for cluster determination in future patients. CONCLUSION: Machine learning characterizes distinct CRT response clusters influenced by CMR features, kidney function, and other factors. These clusters have a strong and additive influence on long-term survival relative to baseline features. Elsevier 2022-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9626744/ /pubmed/36340495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.06.005 Text en © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Bivona, Derek J. Tallavajhala, Srikar Abdi, Mohamad Oomen, Pim J.A. Gao, Xu Malhotra, Rohit Darby, Andrew E. Monfredi, Oliver J. Mangrum, J. Michael Mason, Pamela K. Mazimba, Sula Salerno, Michael Kramer, Christopher M. Epstein, Frederick H. Holmes, Jeffrey W. Bilchick, Kenneth C. Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title | Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_full | Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_fullStr | Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_short | Machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
title_sort | machine learning for multidimensional response and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy using features from cardiac magnetic resonance |
topic | Clinical |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626744/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2022.06.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bivonaderekj machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT tallavajhalasrikar machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT abdimohamad machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT oomenpimja machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT gaoxu machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT malhotrarohit machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT darbyandrewe machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT monfredioliverj machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT mangrumjmichael machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT masonpamelak machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT mazimbasula machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT salernomichael machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT kramerchristopherm machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT epsteinfrederickh machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT holmesjeffreyw machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance AT bilchickkennethc machinelearningformultidimensionalresponseandsurvivalaftercardiacresynchronizationtherapyusingfeaturesfromcardiacmagneticresonance |