Cargando…

Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults

Subject motion is a well-known confound in resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and the analysis of functional connectivity. Consequently, several clean-up strategies have been established to minimize the impact of subject motion. Physiological signals in response to cardiac activity and respirati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheel, Norman, Keller, Jeffrey N., Binder, Ellen F., Vidoni, Eric D., Burns, Jeffrey M., Thomas, Binu P., Stowe, Ann M., Hynan, Linda S., Kerwin, Diana R., Vongpatanasin, Wanpen, Rossetti, Heidi, Cullum, C. Munro, Zhang, Rong, Zhu, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1006056
_version_ 1784822821590925312
author Scheel, Norman
Keller, Jeffrey N.
Binder, Ellen F.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Burns, Jeffrey M.
Thomas, Binu P.
Stowe, Ann M.
Hynan, Linda S.
Kerwin, Diana R.
Vongpatanasin, Wanpen
Rossetti, Heidi
Cullum, C. Munro
Zhang, Rong
Zhu, David C.
author_facet Scheel, Norman
Keller, Jeffrey N.
Binder, Ellen F.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Burns, Jeffrey M.
Thomas, Binu P.
Stowe, Ann M.
Hynan, Linda S.
Kerwin, Diana R.
Vongpatanasin, Wanpen
Rossetti, Heidi
Cullum, C. Munro
Zhang, Rong
Zhu, David C.
author_sort Scheel, Norman
collection PubMed
description Subject motion is a well-known confound in resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and the analysis of functional connectivity. Consequently, several clean-up strategies have been established to minimize the impact of subject motion. Physiological signals in response to cardiac activity and respiration are also known to alter the apparent rs-fMRI connectivity. Comprehensive comparisons of common noise regression techniques showed that the “Independent Component Analysis based strategy for Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts” (ICA-AROMA) was a preferred pre-processing technique for teenagers and adults. However, motion and physiological noise characteristics may differ substantially for older adults. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of noise-regression techniques for older adults from a large multi-site clinical trial of exercise and intensive pharmacological vascular risk factor reduction. The Risk Reduction for Alzheimer’s Disease (rrAD) trial included hypertensive older adults (60–84 years old) at elevated risk of developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We compared the performance of censoring, censoring combined with global signal regression, non-aggressive and aggressive ICA-AROMA, as well as the Spatially Organized Component Klassifikator (SOCK) on the rs-fMRI baseline scans from 434 rrAD subjects. All techniques were rated based on network reproducibility, network identifiability, edge activity, spatial smoothness, and loss of temporal degrees of freedom (tDOF). We found that non-aggressive ICA-AROMA did not perform as well as the other four techniques, which performed table with marginal differences, demonstrating the validity of these techniques. Considering reproducibility as the most important factor for longitudinal studies, given low false-positive rates and a better preserved, more cohesive temporal structure, currently aggressive ICA-AROMA is likely the most suitable noise regression technique for rs-fMRI studies of older adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96268312022-11-03 Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults Scheel, Norman Keller, Jeffrey N. Binder, Ellen F. Vidoni, Eric D. Burns, Jeffrey M. Thomas, Binu P. Stowe, Ann M. Hynan, Linda S. Kerwin, Diana R. Vongpatanasin, Wanpen Rossetti, Heidi Cullum, C. Munro Zhang, Rong Zhu, David C. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Subject motion is a well-known confound in resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and the analysis of functional connectivity. Consequently, several clean-up strategies have been established to minimize the impact of subject motion. Physiological signals in response to cardiac activity and respiration are also known to alter the apparent rs-fMRI connectivity. Comprehensive comparisons of common noise regression techniques showed that the “Independent Component Analysis based strategy for Automatic Removal of Motion Artifacts” (ICA-AROMA) was a preferred pre-processing technique for teenagers and adults. However, motion and physiological noise characteristics may differ substantially for older adults. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of noise-regression techniques for older adults from a large multi-site clinical trial of exercise and intensive pharmacological vascular risk factor reduction. The Risk Reduction for Alzheimer’s Disease (rrAD) trial included hypertensive older adults (60–84 years old) at elevated risk of developing Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). We compared the performance of censoring, censoring combined with global signal regression, non-aggressive and aggressive ICA-AROMA, as well as the Spatially Organized Component Klassifikator (SOCK) on the rs-fMRI baseline scans from 434 rrAD subjects. All techniques were rated based on network reproducibility, network identifiability, edge activity, spatial smoothness, and loss of temporal degrees of freedom (tDOF). We found that non-aggressive ICA-AROMA did not perform as well as the other four techniques, which performed table with marginal differences, demonstrating the validity of these techniques. Considering reproducibility as the most important factor for longitudinal studies, given low false-positive rates and a better preserved, more cohesive temporal structure, currently aggressive ICA-AROMA is likely the most suitable noise regression technique for rs-fMRI studies of older adults. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9626831/ /pubmed/36340768 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1006056 Text en Copyright © 2022 Scheel, Keller, Binder, Vidoni, Burns, Thomas, Stowe, Hynan, Kerwin, Vongpatanasin, Rossetti, Cullum, Zhang and Zhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Scheel, Norman
Keller, Jeffrey N.
Binder, Ellen F.
Vidoni, Eric D.
Burns, Jeffrey M.
Thomas, Binu P.
Stowe, Ann M.
Hynan, Linda S.
Kerwin, Diana R.
Vongpatanasin, Wanpen
Rossetti, Heidi
Cullum, C. Munro
Zhang, Rong
Zhu, David C.
Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title_full Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title_fullStr Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title_short Evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fMRI studies using data of 434 older adults
title_sort evaluation of noise regression techniques in resting-state fmri studies using data of 434 older adults
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36340768
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.1006056
work_keys_str_mv AT scheelnorman evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT kellerjeffreyn evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT binderellenf evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT vidoniericd evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT burnsjeffreym evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT thomasbinup evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT stoweannm evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT hynanlindas evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT kerwindianar evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT vongpatanasinwanpen evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT rossettiheidi evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT cullumcmunro evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT zhangrong evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults
AT zhudavidc evaluationofnoiseregressiontechniquesinrestingstatefmristudiesusingdataof434olderadults