Cargando…
The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic detai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1 |
_version_ | 1784822823335755776 |
---|---|
author | Hadfield, James N. Omogbehin, Tomisin S. Brookes, Charlotte Walker, Reece Trompeter, Alex Bretherton, Christopher P. Gray, Andrew Eardley, William G. P. |
author_facet | Hadfield, James N. Omogbehin, Tomisin S. Brookes, Charlotte Walker, Reece Trompeter, Alex Bretherton, Christopher P. Gray, Andrew Eardley, William G. P. |
author_sort | Hadfield, James N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. METHODS: Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. RESULTS: In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). CONCLUSION: This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9626856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96268562022-11-07 The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK Hadfield, James N. Omogbehin, Tomisin S. Brookes, Charlotte Walker, Reece Trompeter, Alex Bretherton, Christopher P. Gray, Andrew Eardley, William G. P. Bone Jt Open Trauma AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. METHODS: Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. RESULTS: In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). CONCLUSION: This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9626856/ /pubmed/36181319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Trauma Hadfield, James N. Omogbehin, Tomisin S. Brookes, Charlotte Walker, Reece Trompeter, Alex Bretherton, Christopher P. Gray, Andrew Eardley, William G. P. The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title | The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title_full | The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title_fullStr | The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title_short | The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK |
title_sort | open-fracture patient evaluation nationwide (open) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the uk |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hadfieldjamesn theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT omogbehintomisins theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT brookescharlotte theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT walkerreece theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT trompeteralex theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT brethertonchristopherp theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT grayandrew theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT eardleywilliamgp theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT hadfieldjamesn openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT omogbehintomisins openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT brookescharlotte openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT walkerreece openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT trompeteralex openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT brethertonchristopherp openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT grayandrew openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT eardleywilliamgp openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk AT openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk |