Cargando…

The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK

AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic detai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hadfield, James N., Omogbehin, Tomisin S., Brookes, Charlotte, Walker, Reece, Trompeter, Alex, Bretherton, Christopher P., Gray, Andrew, Eardley, William G. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1
_version_ 1784822823335755776
author Hadfield, James N.
Omogbehin, Tomisin S.
Brookes, Charlotte
Walker, Reece
Trompeter, Alex
Bretherton, Christopher P.
Gray, Andrew
Eardley, William G. P.
author_facet Hadfield, James N.
Omogbehin, Tomisin S.
Brookes, Charlotte
Walker, Reece
Trompeter, Alex
Bretherton, Christopher P.
Gray, Andrew
Eardley, William G. P.
author_sort Hadfield, James N.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. METHODS: Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. RESULTS: In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). CONCLUSION: This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96268562022-11-07 The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK Hadfield, James N. Omogbehin, Tomisin S. Brookes, Charlotte Walker, Reece Trompeter, Alex Bretherton, Christopher P. Gray, Andrew Eardley, William G. P. Bone Jt Open Trauma AIMS: Understanding of open fracture management is skewed due to reliance on small-number lower limb, specialist unit reports and large, unfocused registry data collections. To address this, we carried out the Open Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study, and report the demographic details and the initial steps of care for patients admitted with open fractures in the UK. METHODS: Any patient admitted to hospital with an open fracture between 1 June 2021 and 30 September 2021 was included, excluding phalanges and isolated hand injuries. Institutional information governance approval was obtained at the lead site and all data entered using Research Electronic Data Capture. Demographic details, injury, fracture classification, and patient dispersal were detailed. RESULTS: In total, 1,175 patients (median age 47 years (interquartile range (IQR) 29 to 65), 61.0% male (n = 717)) were admitted across 51 sites. A total of 546 patients (47.1%) were employed, 5.4% (n = 63) were diabetic, and 28.8% (n = 335) were smokers. In total, 29.0% of patients (n = 341) had more than one injury and 4.8% (n = 56) had two or more open fractures, while 51.3% of fractures (n = 637) occurred in the lower leg. Fractures sustained in vehicle incidents and collisions are common (38.8%; n = 455) and typically seen in younger patients. A simple fall (35.0%; n = 410) is common in older people. Overall, 69.8% (n = 786) of patients were admitted directly to an orthoplastic centre, 23.0% (n = 259) were transferred to an orthoplastic centre after initial management elsewhere, and 7.2% were managed outwith specialist units (n = 81). CONCLUSION: This study describes the epidemiology of open fractures in the UK. For a decade, orthopaedic surgeons have been practicing in a guideline-driven, network system without understanding the patient features, injury characteristics, or dispersal processes of the wider population. This work will inform care pathways as the UK looks to the future of trauma networks and guidelines, and how to optimize care for patients with open fractures. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):746–752. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9626856/ /pubmed/36181319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Trauma
Hadfield, James N.
Omogbehin, Tomisin S.
Brookes, Charlotte
Walker, Reece
Trompeter, Alex
Bretherton, Christopher P.
Gray, Andrew
Eardley, William G. P.
The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title_full The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title_fullStr The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title_full_unstemmed The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title_short The Open-Fracture Patient Evaluation Nationwide (OPEN) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the UK
title_sort open-fracture patient evaluation nationwide (open) study: epidemiology of open fracture care in the uk
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36181319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0079.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT hadfieldjamesn theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT omogbehintomisins theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT brookescharlotte theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT walkerreece theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT trompeteralex theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT brethertonchristopherp theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT grayandrew theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT eardleywilliamgp theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT theopenfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT hadfieldjamesn openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT omogbehintomisins openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT brookescharlotte openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT walkerreece openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT trompeteralex openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT brethertonchristopherp openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT grayandrew openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT eardleywilliamgp openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk
AT openfracturepatientevaluationnationwideopenstudyepidemiologyofopenfracturecareintheuk