Cargando…
E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses
The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Scie...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004 |
_version_ | 1784822824583561216 |
---|---|
author | Riiser, Amund Bere, Elling Andersen, Lars Bo Nordengen, Solveig |
author_facet | Riiser, Amund Bere, Elling Andersen, Lars Bo Nordengen, Solveig |
author_sort | Riiser, Amund |
collection | PubMed |
description | The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cinahl and SportDiscus and risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). We performed meta-analysis with random effects models on outcomes presented in more than one study. Our study includes one randomized controlled trial, five quasi experimental trials and two longitudinal cohort studies. The trials included 214 subjects of whom 77 were included in control groups, and the cohort studies included 10,222 respondents at baseline. Maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output were assessed in four and tree trials including 78 and 57 subjects, respectively. E-cycling increased maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output with 0.48 SMD (95%CI 0.16–0.80) and 0.62 SMD (95%CI 0.24–0.99). One trial reported a decrease in 2-h post plasma glucoses from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L(−1) and one cohort study reported that obese respondents performed 0.21 times more trips on E-bike than respondents with normal weight. All the included studies had a high risk of bias due to flaws in randomization. However, the outcomes investigated in most studies showed that E-cycling can improve health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9626861 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96268612022-11-03 E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses Riiser, Amund Bere, Elling Andersen, Lars Bo Nordengen, Solveig Front Sports Act Living Sports and Active Living The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cinahl and SportDiscus and risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). We performed meta-analysis with random effects models on outcomes presented in more than one study. Our study includes one randomized controlled trial, five quasi experimental trials and two longitudinal cohort studies. The trials included 214 subjects of whom 77 were included in control groups, and the cohort studies included 10,222 respondents at baseline. Maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output were assessed in four and tree trials including 78 and 57 subjects, respectively. E-cycling increased maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output with 0.48 SMD (95%CI 0.16–0.80) and 0.62 SMD (95%CI 0.24–0.99). One trial reported a decrease in 2-h post plasma glucoses from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L(−1) and one cohort study reported that obese respondents performed 0.21 times more trips on E-bike than respondents with normal weight. All the included studies had a high risk of bias due to flaws in randomization. However, the outcomes investigated in most studies showed that E-cycling can improve health. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9626861/ /pubmed/36339641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004 Text en Copyright © 2022 Riiser, Bere, Andersen and Nordengen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Sports and Active Living Riiser, Amund Bere, Elling Andersen, Lars Bo Nordengen, Solveig E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title | E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title_full | E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title_fullStr | E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title_short | E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
title_sort | e-cycling and health benefits: a systematic literature review with meta-analyses |
topic | Sports and Active Living |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626861/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT riiseramund ecyclingandhealthbenefitsasystematicliteraturereviewwithmetaanalyses AT bereelling ecyclingandhealthbenefitsasystematicliteraturereviewwithmetaanalyses AT andersenlarsbo ecyclingandhealthbenefitsasystematicliteraturereviewwithmetaanalyses AT nordengensolveig ecyclingandhealthbenefitsasystematicliteraturereviewwithmetaanalyses |