Cargando…

Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model

AIMS: Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liechti, Emanuel F., Attinger, Marc C., Hecker, Andreas, Kuonen, Kim, Michel, Andrea, Klenke, Frank M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0107.R1
_version_ 1784822827213389824
author Liechti, Emanuel F.
Attinger, Marc C.
Hecker, Andreas
Kuonen, Kim
Michel, Andrea
Klenke, Frank M.
author_facet Liechti, Emanuel F.
Attinger, Marc C.
Hecker, Andreas
Kuonen, Kim
Michel, Andrea
Klenke, Frank M.
author_sort Liechti, Emanuel F.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitative data of the measurement error of the FO in relation to leg position and X-ray source position using a newly developed geometric model and clinical data. METHODS: We analyzed the FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs in a prospective consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. To determine sample size, a power analysis was performed. Patients’ position and X-ray beam setting followed a standardized protocol to achieve reproducible projections. All images were calibrated with the KingMark calibration system. In addition, a geometric model was created to evaluate both the effects of leg position (rotation and abduction/adduction) and the effects of X-ray source position on FO measurement. RESULTS: The mean FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs were 38.0 mm (SD 6.4) and 36.6 mm (SD 6.3) (p < 0.001), respectively. Radiological view had a smaller effect on FO measurement than inaccurate leg positioning. The model showed a non-linear relationship between projected FO and femoral neck orientation; at 30° external neck rotation (with reference to the detector plane), a true FO of 40 mm was underestimated by up to 20% (7.8 mm). With a neutral to mild external neck rotation (≤ 15°), the underestimation was less than 7% (2.7 mm). The effect of abduction and adduction was negligible. CONCLUSION: For routine THA templating, an AP pelvis radiograph remains the gold standard. Only patients with femoral neck malrotation > 15° on the AP pelvis view, e.g. due to external rotation contracture, should receive further imaging. Options include an additional AP hip view with elevation of the entire affected hip to align the femoral neck more parallel to the detector, or a CT scan in more severe cases. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):795–803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96268712022-11-07 Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model Liechti, Emanuel F. Attinger, Marc C. Hecker, Andreas Kuonen, Kim Michel, Andrea Klenke, Frank M. Bone Jt Open Hip AIMS: Traditionally, total hip arthroplasty (THA) templating has been performed on anteroposterior (AP) pelvis radiographs. Recently, additional AP hip radiographs have been recommended for accurate measurement of the femoral offset (FO). To verify this claim, this study aimed to establish quantitative data of the measurement error of the FO in relation to leg position and X-ray source position using a newly developed geometric model and clinical data. METHODS: We analyzed the FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs in a prospective consecutive series of 55 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA for hip osteoarthritis. To determine sample size, a power analysis was performed. Patients’ position and X-ray beam setting followed a standardized protocol to achieve reproducible projections. All images were calibrated with the KingMark calibration system. In addition, a geometric model was created to evaluate both the effects of leg position (rotation and abduction/adduction) and the effects of X-ray source position on FO measurement. RESULTS: The mean FOs measured on AP hip and pelvis radiographs were 38.0 mm (SD 6.4) and 36.6 mm (SD 6.3) (p < 0.001), respectively. Radiological view had a smaller effect on FO measurement than inaccurate leg positioning. The model showed a non-linear relationship between projected FO and femoral neck orientation; at 30° external neck rotation (with reference to the detector plane), a true FO of 40 mm was underestimated by up to 20% (7.8 mm). With a neutral to mild external neck rotation (≤ 15°), the underestimation was less than 7% (2.7 mm). The effect of abduction and adduction was negligible. CONCLUSION: For routine THA templating, an AP pelvis radiograph remains the gold standard. Only patients with femoral neck malrotation > 15° on the AP pelvis view, e.g. due to external rotation contracture, should receive further imaging. Options include an additional AP hip view with elevation of the entire affected hip to align the femoral neck more parallel to the detector, or a CT scan in more severe cases. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):795–803. The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9626871/ /pubmed/36222112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0107.R1 Text en © 2022 Author(s) et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Hip
Liechti, Emanuel F.
Attinger, Marc C.
Hecker, Andreas
Kuonen, Kim
Michel, Andrea
Klenke, Frank M.
Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title_full Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title_fullStr Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title_short Quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
title_sort quantitative determination of the femoral offset templating error in total hip arthroplasty using a new geometric model
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36222112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0107.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT liechtiemanuelf quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel
AT attingermarcc quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel
AT heckerandreas quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel
AT kuonenkim quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel
AT michelandrea quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel
AT klenkefrankm quantitativedeterminationofthefemoraloffsettemplatingerrorintotalhiparthroplastyusinganewgeometricmodel