Cargando…

Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials

Many drugs used in paediatric medicine are off-label. There is a rising call for the use of adaptive clinical trial designs (ADs) in responding to the need for safe and effective drugs given their potential to offer efficiency and cost-effective benefits compared with traditional clinical trials. AD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Afolabi, Michael OS, Kelly, Lauren E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107263
_version_ 1784822838930178048
author Afolabi, Michael OS
Kelly, Lauren E
author_facet Afolabi, Michael OS
Kelly, Lauren E
author_sort Afolabi, Michael OS
collection PubMed
description Many drugs used in paediatric medicine are off-label. There is a rising call for the use of adaptive clinical trial designs (ADs) in responding to the need for safe and effective drugs given their potential to offer efficiency and cost-effective benefits compared with traditional clinical trials. ADs have a strong appeal in paediatric clinical trials given the small number of available participants, limited understanding of age-related variability and the desire to limit exposure to futile or unsafe interventions. Although the ethical value of adaptive trials has increasingly come under scrutiny, there is a paucity of literature on the ethical dilemmas that may be associated with paediatric adaptive designs (PADs). This paper highlights some of these ethical concerns around safety, scientific/social value and caregiver/guardian comprehension of the trial design. Against this background, the paper develops a non-static conceptual lens for understanding PADs. It shows that ADs are epistemically open and reduce some of the knowledge-associated uncertainties inherent in clinical trials as well as fast-track the time to draw conclusions about the value of evaluated drugs/treatments. On this note, the authors argue that PADs are ethically justifiable given they (1) have multiple layers of safety, exposing enrolled children to lesser potential risks, (2) create social/scientific value generally and for paediatric populations in particular, (3) specifically foster the flourishing of paediatric populations and (4) can significantly improve paediatric trial efficiency when properly designed and implemented. However, because PADs are relatively new and their regulatory, ethical and logistical characteristics are yet to be clarified in some jurisdictions, the cooperation of various public and private stakeholders is required to ensure that the interests of children, their caregivers and parents/guardians are best served while exposing paediatric research subjects to the most minimal of risks when they are enrolled in paediatric trials that use ADs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96269162022-11-03 Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials Afolabi, Michael OS Kelly, Lauren E J Med Ethics Original Research Many drugs used in paediatric medicine are off-label. There is a rising call for the use of adaptive clinical trial designs (ADs) in responding to the need for safe and effective drugs given their potential to offer efficiency and cost-effective benefits compared with traditional clinical trials. ADs have a strong appeal in paediatric clinical trials given the small number of available participants, limited understanding of age-related variability and the desire to limit exposure to futile or unsafe interventions. Although the ethical value of adaptive trials has increasingly come under scrutiny, there is a paucity of literature on the ethical dilemmas that may be associated with paediatric adaptive designs (PADs). This paper highlights some of these ethical concerns around safety, scientific/social value and caregiver/guardian comprehension of the trial design. Against this background, the paper develops a non-static conceptual lens for understanding PADs. It shows that ADs are epistemically open and reduce some of the knowledge-associated uncertainties inherent in clinical trials as well as fast-track the time to draw conclusions about the value of evaluated drugs/treatments. On this note, the authors argue that PADs are ethically justifiable given they (1) have multiple layers of safety, exposing enrolled children to lesser potential risks, (2) create social/scientific value generally and for paediatric populations in particular, (3) specifically foster the flourishing of paediatric populations and (4) can significantly improve paediatric trial efficiency when properly designed and implemented. However, because PADs are relatively new and their regulatory, ethical and logistical characteristics are yet to be clarified in some jurisdictions, the cooperation of various public and private stakeholders is required to ensure that the interests of children, their caregivers and parents/guardians are best served while exposing paediatric research subjects to the most minimal of risks when they are enrolled in paediatric trials that use ADs. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9626916/ /pubmed/34362828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107263 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Afolabi, Michael OS
Kelly, Lauren E
Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title_full Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title_fullStr Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title_full_unstemmed Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title_short Non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
title_sort non-static framework for understanding adaptive designs: an ethical justification in paediatric trials
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34362828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2021-107263
work_keys_str_mv AT afolabimichaelos nonstaticframeworkforunderstandingadaptivedesignsanethicaljustificationinpaediatrictrials
AT kellylaurene nonstaticframeworkforunderstandingadaptivedesignsanethicaljustificationinpaediatrictrials