Cargando…

Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds

Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferretti, Patrich, Santi, Gian Maria, Leon-Cardenas, Christian, Fusari, Elena, Cristofori, Mattia, Liverani, Alfredo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136
_version_ 1784822845931520000
author Ferretti, Patrich
Santi, Gian Maria
Leon-Cardenas, Christian
Fusari, Elena
Cristofori, Mattia
Liverani, Alfredo
author_facet Ferretti, Patrich
Santi, Gian Maria
Leon-Cardenas, Christian
Fusari, Elena
Cristofori, Mattia
Liverani, Alfredo
author_sort Ferretti, Patrich
collection PubMed
description Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of 3D printing to aid production is the most common approach. Moreover, the use of 3D printing in prototypes result in a waste of material since no reuse is considered. In the following manuscript, this technology is applied to mould fabrication by achieving a low surface roughness at a modest cost compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the possibility to use a combination of thermoplastic materials is analysed by examination of the CAD model optimized for Additive Manufacturing (AM) from scratch and was verified using metrology tools. Several moulds were finally built and applied to the specific case study of carbon fibre laminated components. This manuscript aims to analyse the manufacturing process by comparing the mould surface geometry before and after the smoothing process. The achieved tolerance between the produced moulds is ±0.05 mm that ensures the repeatability of the process from an industrial point of view; whilst the deviation between CAD and mould is ±0.2 mm. To combine an accurate FDM process together with chemical smoothing proved to be a powerful strategy to produce high quality components that can be inserted in the production process by means of traditional manufacturing techniques. This will aid to reduce the cost of standard manufacturing for low production batches and prototypes of carbon fibre composites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9626940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96269402022-11-03 Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds Ferretti, Patrich Santi, Gian Maria Leon-Cardenas, Christian Fusari, Elena Cristofori, Mattia Liverani, Alfredo Heliyon Research Article Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of 3D printing to aid production is the most common approach. Moreover, the use of 3D printing in prototypes result in a waste of material since no reuse is considered. In the following manuscript, this technology is applied to mould fabrication by achieving a low surface roughness at a modest cost compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the possibility to use a combination of thermoplastic materials is analysed by examination of the CAD model optimized for Additive Manufacturing (AM) from scratch and was verified using metrology tools. Several moulds were finally built and applied to the specific case study of carbon fibre laminated components. This manuscript aims to analyse the manufacturing process by comparing the mould surface geometry before and after the smoothing process. The achieved tolerance between the produced moulds is ±0.05 mm that ensures the repeatability of the process from an industrial point of view; whilst the deviation between CAD and mould is ±0.2 mm. To combine an accurate FDM process together with chemical smoothing proved to be a powerful strategy to produce high quality components that can be inserted in the production process by means of traditional manufacturing techniques. This will aid to reduce the cost of standard manufacturing for low production batches and prototypes of carbon fibre composites. Elsevier 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9626940/ /pubmed/36339988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferretti, Patrich
Santi, Gian Maria
Leon-Cardenas, Christian
Fusari, Elena
Cristofori, Mattia
Liverani, Alfredo
Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title_full Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title_fullStr Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title_full_unstemmed Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title_short Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
title_sort production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3d printed moulds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrettipatrich productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds
AT santigianmaria productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds
AT leoncardenaschristian productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds
AT fusarielena productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds
AT cristoforimattia productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds
AT liveranialfredo productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds