Cargando…
Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136 |
_version_ | 1784822845931520000 |
---|---|
author | Ferretti, Patrich Santi, Gian Maria Leon-Cardenas, Christian Fusari, Elena Cristofori, Mattia Liverani, Alfredo |
author_facet | Ferretti, Patrich Santi, Gian Maria Leon-Cardenas, Christian Fusari, Elena Cristofori, Mattia Liverani, Alfredo |
author_sort | Ferretti, Patrich |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of 3D printing to aid production is the most common approach. Moreover, the use of 3D printing in prototypes result in a waste of material since no reuse is considered. In the following manuscript, this technology is applied to mould fabrication by achieving a low surface roughness at a modest cost compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the possibility to use a combination of thermoplastic materials is analysed by examination of the CAD model optimized for Additive Manufacturing (AM) from scratch and was verified using metrology tools. Several moulds were finally built and applied to the specific case study of carbon fibre laminated components. This manuscript aims to analyse the manufacturing process by comparing the mould surface geometry before and after the smoothing process. The achieved tolerance between the produced moulds is ±0.05 mm that ensures the repeatability of the process from an industrial point of view; whilst the deviation between CAD and mould is ±0.2 mm. To combine an accurate FDM process together with chemical smoothing proved to be a powerful strategy to produce high quality components that can be inserted in the production process by means of traditional manufacturing techniques. This will aid to reduce the cost of standard manufacturing for low production batches and prototypes of carbon fibre composites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9626940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96269402022-11-03 Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds Ferretti, Patrich Santi, Gian Maria Leon-Cardenas, Christian Fusari, Elena Cristofori, Mattia Liverani, Alfredo Heliyon Research Article Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) technology allows to choose a large variety of materials and it is widely used by companies and individuals nowadays. The cost effectiveness of rapid prototyping is achievable via FDM, that makes this technology useful for research and innovation. The application of 3D printing to aid production is the most common approach. Moreover, the use of 3D printing in prototypes result in a waste of material since no reuse is considered. In the following manuscript, this technology is applied to mould fabrication by achieving a low surface roughness at a modest cost compared to conventional manufacturing methods. Moreover, the possibility to use a combination of thermoplastic materials is analysed by examination of the CAD model optimized for Additive Manufacturing (AM) from scratch and was verified using metrology tools. Several moulds were finally built and applied to the specific case study of carbon fibre laminated components. This manuscript aims to analyse the manufacturing process by comparing the mould surface geometry before and after the smoothing process. The achieved tolerance between the produced moulds is ±0.05 mm that ensures the repeatability of the process from an industrial point of view; whilst the deviation between CAD and mould is ±0.2 mm. To combine an accurate FDM process together with chemical smoothing proved to be a powerful strategy to produce high quality components that can be inserted in the production process by means of traditional manufacturing techniques. This will aid to reduce the cost of standard manufacturing for low production batches and prototypes of carbon fibre composites. Elsevier 2022-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9626940/ /pubmed/36339988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ferretti, Patrich Santi, Gian Maria Leon-Cardenas, Christian Fusari, Elena Cristofori, Mattia Liverani, Alfredo Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title | Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title_full | Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title_fullStr | Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title_full_unstemmed | Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title_short | Production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3D printed moulds |
title_sort | production readiness assessment of low cost, multi-material, polymeric 3d printed moulds |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9626940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11136 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrettipatrich productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds AT santigianmaria productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds AT leoncardenaschristian productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds AT fusarielena productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds AT cristoforimattia productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds AT liveranialfredo productionreadinessassessmentoflowcostmultimaterialpolymeric3dprintedmoulds |