Finite‐Element Analysis of a Novel Cephalomedullary Nail for Restricted Sliding to Reduce Risk of Implant Failure in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures

OBJECTIVE: How to restrict sliding of cephalomedullary nail and rigid reconstruct medial support for unstable intertrochanteric fractures remains a challenge. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a novel cephalomedullary nail for restriction sliding and reconstruction of medial femoral support to prevent failure in unstable trochanteric fractures through finite element analysis. METHODS: The DICOM files of a unilateral femur spiral computed tomography (CT) scans from a elderly female were converted into STL files, and the most common clinical trochanteric fracture model with the absence of medial support, AO/OTA 31‐A2.3 was simulated by removing the posterior medial femur. The model of a novel medial sustain nail (MSN‐II) and a widely used nail (proximal femoral nail anti‐rotation PFNA‐II) were modeled according to the manufacturer‐provided engineering drawing. Different loads were applied to the femoral head to simulate the postoperative weight bearing gait. The sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, maximum stress of femur and nail, displacement of proximal fragment were analyzed to revealing the mechanical stability of unstable trochanteric fracture stabilized by different implant. RESULTS: The sliding distance of helical blade in the femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, the displacement of proximal fragment in MSN‐II under 2100N axial load were 0.65 mm, 689 MPa, 1271 MPa, 16.84 mm respectively, while that were 1.43 mm, 720.8 MPa, 1444 MPa, 18.18 mm, respectively in PFNA‐II. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05) and the stress was mainly distributed in medial distal side of nail but helical blade and the proximal aperture for the nail in MSN‐II. Compared to PFNA‐II, MSN‐II demonstrates biomechanical merit against femur medialization, cut‐out and coax varus. CONCLUSION: The sliding distance of helical blade in femoral neck, the maximum stress on the femur and nail, and the displacement of proximal fragment of MSN‐II were less than those of PFNA‐II in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Therefore MSN‐II has better stability than PFNA‐II and it may have the potential to avoid femur medialization and cut out. It might be an option in unstable trochanteric fracture because of its superiority in restricted sliding and medial support reconstruction.