Cargando…

LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis

Ultrasonographic evaluation of polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) is part of the diagnostic evaluation of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The relevance of PCOM as a diagnostic criterion for PCOS was reaffirmed in the most recent International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pea, Jeffrey, Bryan, Jahnay, Oldfield, Alexis L, Carter, Faith E, Johnson, Lynn M, Lujan, Marla E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627535/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1342
_version_ 1784822992524541952
author Pea, Jeffrey
Bryan, Jahnay
Oldfield, Alexis L
Carter, Faith E
Johnson, Lynn M
Lujan, Marla E
author_facet Pea, Jeffrey
Bryan, Jahnay
Oldfield, Alexis L
Carter, Faith E
Johnson, Lynn M
Lujan, Marla E
author_sort Pea, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description Ultrasonographic evaluation of polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) is part of the diagnostic evaluation of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The relevance of PCOM as a diagnostic criterion for PCOS was reaffirmed in the most recent International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the best practices and specific ultrasonographic markers to define PCOM. We synthesized evidence on diagnostic test accuracy of ovarian ultrasound features to comprehensively determine the most suitable markers to diagnose PCOS. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy measures (e. g., thresholds, sensitivity, specificity) for PCOS using the following ovarian markers: follicle number per ovary (FNPO) or per single cross-section (FNPS), ovarian volume (OV), and stromal features. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched until 7 November 2021 to identify studies that compared ultrasound markers between women with PCOS to those without PCOS. Risk of bias and applicability assessment for diagnostic test accuracy studies were determined using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tool for a single index test or between multiple index tests, respectively. From a total of 1869 records initially identified, 22 studies were included and 18 (N=6,337; [n=2991 PCOS; n= 3346 Control]) were pooled for meta-analysis. FNPO was the most accurate diagnostic marker (sensitivity: 84%, CI: 81% to 87%; specificity: 91%, CI: 87% to 94%). OV and FNPS had similar but inferior pooled sensitivity (OV: 81%, CI: 75% to 86%; FNPS: 81%, CI: 70% to 89%) and specificity (OV: 79%, CI: 73% to 84%; FNPS: 83%, CI: 75% to 88%) compared to FNPO. Majority of studies had high risk of bias for patient selection and index test methodology across all markers. Subgroup analysis indicated that stratification based on age, body mass index (BMI), and previously proposed thresholds did not account for the heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy observed across studies. For FNPO, studies that used a transducer frequency <8MHz or the Rotterdam criteria had improved positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and sensitivity, respectively. European studies had improved diagnostic accuracy (specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, +LR) compared to North American studies for FNPO, potentially due to BMI differences between PCOS populations (North America: 30.29 ± 0.61kg/m2, Europe: 27.62 ± 0.73kg/m2). Our findings support the use of FNPO as the gold standard in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of PCOS, with OV and FNPS as robust alternatives if total antral follicle counts cannot be obtained. These findings also identify avenues for future research to refine the ultrasonographic definition of PCOM for timely diagnosis of PCOS and investigations into phenotypic variations in pathogenesis and response to treatment in this condition (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021259118). Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9627535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96275352022-11-03 LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis Pea, Jeffrey Bryan, Jahnay Oldfield, Alexis L Carter, Faith E Johnson, Lynn M Lujan, Marla E J Endocr Soc Reproductive Endocrinology Ultrasonographic evaluation of polycystic ovarian morphology (PCOM) is part of the diagnostic evaluation of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). The relevance of PCOM as a diagnostic criterion for PCOS was reaffirmed in the most recent International Evidence-Based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of PCOS. However, there remains a lack of clarity regarding the best practices and specific ultrasonographic markers to define PCOM. We synthesized evidence on diagnostic test accuracy of ovarian ultrasound features to comprehensively determine the most suitable markers to diagnose PCOS. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy measures (e. g., thresholds, sensitivity, specificity) for PCOS using the following ovarian markers: follicle number per ovary (FNPO) or per single cross-section (FNPS), ovarian volume (OV), and stromal features. Databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and CENTRAL were searched until 7 November 2021 to identify studies that compared ultrasound markers between women with PCOS to those without PCOS. Risk of bias and applicability assessment for diagnostic test accuracy studies were determined using the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tool for a single index test or between multiple index tests, respectively. From a total of 1869 records initially identified, 22 studies were included and 18 (N=6,337; [n=2991 PCOS; n= 3346 Control]) were pooled for meta-analysis. FNPO was the most accurate diagnostic marker (sensitivity: 84%, CI: 81% to 87%; specificity: 91%, CI: 87% to 94%). OV and FNPS had similar but inferior pooled sensitivity (OV: 81%, CI: 75% to 86%; FNPS: 81%, CI: 70% to 89%) and specificity (OV: 79%, CI: 73% to 84%; FNPS: 83%, CI: 75% to 88%) compared to FNPO. Majority of studies had high risk of bias for patient selection and index test methodology across all markers. Subgroup analysis indicated that stratification based on age, body mass index (BMI), and previously proposed thresholds did not account for the heterogeneity in diagnostic accuracy observed across studies. For FNPO, studies that used a transducer frequency <8MHz or the Rotterdam criteria had improved positive likelihood ratio (+LR) and sensitivity, respectively. European studies had improved diagnostic accuracy (specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, +LR) compared to North American studies for FNPO, potentially due to BMI differences between PCOS populations (North America: 30.29 ± 0.61kg/m2, Europe: 27.62 ± 0.73kg/m2). Our findings support the use of FNPO as the gold standard in the ultrasonographic diagnosis of PCOS, with OV and FNPS as robust alternatives if total antral follicle counts cannot be obtained. These findings also identify avenues for future research to refine the ultrasonographic definition of PCOM for timely diagnosis of PCOS and investigations into phenotypic variations in pathogenesis and response to treatment in this condition (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021259118). Presentation: Monday, June 13, 2022 12:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. Oxford University Press 2022-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9627535/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1342 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Reproductive Endocrinology
Pea, Jeffrey
Bryan, Jahnay
Oldfield, Alexis L
Carter, Faith E
Johnson, Lynn M
Lujan, Marla E
LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title_full LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title_fullStr LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title_full_unstemmed LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title_short LBMON234 Ultrasonographic Criteria In The Diagnosis Of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review And Meta Analysis
title_sort lbmon234 ultrasonographic criteria in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Reproductive Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627535/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvac150.1342
work_keys_str_mv AT peajeffrey lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bryanjahnay lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oldfieldalexisl lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT carterfaithe lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT johnsonlynnm lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lujanmarlae lbmon234ultrasonographiccriteriainthediagnosisofpolycysticovarysyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis