Cargando…

At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale

STUDY QUESTION: Can we detect DNA methylation differences between ART children that underwent embryo culture in different media? SUMMARY ANSWER: We identified no significant differences in site-specific or regional DNA methylation between the different culture medium groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koeck, Rebekka M, Busato, Florence, Tost, Jorg, Zandstra, Heleen, Remy, Sylvie, Langie, Sabine, Gielen, Marij, van Golde, Ron, Dumoulin, John C M, Brunner, Han, Zamani Esteki, Masoud, van Montfoort, Aafke P A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac213
_version_ 1784823038918787072
author Koeck, Rebekka M
Busato, Florence
Tost, Jorg
Zandstra, Heleen
Remy, Sylvie
Langie, Sabine
Gielen, Marij
van Golde, Ron
Dumoulin, John C M
Brunner, Han
Zamani Esteki, Masoud
van Montfoort, Aafke P A
author_facet Koeck, Rebekka M
Busato, Florence
Tost, Jorg
Zandstra, Heleen
Remy, Sylvie
Langie, Sabine
Gielen, Marij
van Golde, Ron
Dumoulin, John C M
Brunner, Han
Zamani Esteki, Masoud
van Montfoort, Aafke P A
author_sort Koeck, Rebekka M
collection PubMed
description STUDY QUESTION: Can we detect DNA methylation differences between ART children that underwent embryo culture in different media? SUMMARY ANSWER: We identified no significant differences in site-specific or regional DNA methylation between the different culture medium groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo culture in G3 or K-SICM medium leads to differences in embryonic, neonatal and childhood outcomes, including growth and weight. The methylome may mediate this association as the period of in vitro culture of ART treatments coincides with epigenetic reprogramming. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was conducted as a follow-up to a previous culture medium comparison study in which couples were pseudo-randomized to embryo culture in G3 or K-SICM medium. Of the resultant singletons, 120 (n = 65 G3, n = 55 K-SICM), were recruited at age 9. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The ART children provided a saliva sample from which the methylome was analysed using the Infinium MethylationEPIC array. After quality and context filtering, 106 (n = 57 G3, n = 49 K-SICM) samples and 659 708 sites were retained for the analyses. Differential methylation analyses were conducted using mixed effects linear models corrected for age, sex, sample plate and cell composition. These were applied to all cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) sites, various genomic regions (genes, promoters, CpG Islands (CGIs)) and as a targeted analysis of imprinted genes and birth weight-associated CpG sites. Differential variance was assessed using the improved epigenetic variable outliers for risk prediction analysis (iEVORA) algorithm and methylation outliers were identified using a previously defined threshold (upper or lower quartile plus or minus three times the interquartile range, respectively). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After correcting for multiple testing, we did not identify any significantly differentially methylated CpG sites, genes, promoters or CGIs between G3 and K-SICM children despite a lenient corrected P-value threshold of 0.1. Targeted analyses of (sites within) imprinted genes and birth weight-associated sites also did not identify any significant differences. The number of DNA methylation outliers per sample was comparable between the culture medium groups. iEVORA identified 101 differentially variable CpG sites of which 94 were more variable in the G3 group. LARGE SCALE DATA: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE196432 LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: To detect significant methylation differences with a magnitude of <10% between the groups many more participants would be necessary; however, the clinical relevance of such small differences is unclear. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of this study are reassuring, suggesting that if there is an effect of the culture medium on DNA methylation (and methylation-mediated diseases risk), it does not differ between the two media investigated here. The findings concur with other methylome studies of ART neonates and children that underwent embryo culture in different media, which also found no significant methylome differences. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Study funded by March of Dimes (6-FY13-153), EVA (Erfelijkheid Voortplanting & Aanleg) specialty programme (grant no. KP111513) of Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) and the Horizon 2020 innovation (ERIN) (grant no. EU952516) of the European Commission. The authors do not report any conflicts of interest relevant to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial register—NL4083
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9627755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96277552022-11-04 At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale Koeck, Rebekka M Busato, Florence Tost, Jorg Zandstra, Heleen Remy, Sylvie Langie, Sabine Gielen, Marij van Golde, Ron Dumoulin, John C M Brunner, Han Zamani Esteki, Masoud van Montfoort, Aafke P A Hum Reprod Original Articles STUDY QUESTION: Can we detect DNA methylation differences between ART children that underwent embryo culture in different media? SUMMARY ANSWER: We identified no significant differences in site-specific or regional DNA methylation between the different culture medium groups. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Embryo culture in G3 or K-SICM medium leads to differences in embryonic, neonatal and childhood outcomes, including growth and weight. The methylome may mediate this association as the period of in vitro culture of ART treatments coincides with epigenetic reprogramming. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was conducted as a follow-up to a previous culture medium comparison study in which couples were pseudo-randomized to embryo culture in G3 or K-SICM medium. Of the resultant singletons, 120 (n = 65 G3, n = 55 K-SICM), were recruited at age 9. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The ART children provided a saliva sample from which the methylome was analysed using the Infinium MethylationEPIC array. After quality and context filtering, 106 (n = 57 G3, n = 49 K-SICM) samples and 659 708 sites were retained for the analyses. Differential methylation analyses were conducted using mixed effects linear models corrected for age, sex, sample plate and cell composition. These were applied to all cytosine-guanine dinucleotide (CpG) sites, various genomic regions (genes, promoters, CpG Islands (CGIs)) and as a targeted analysis of imprinted genes and birth weight-associated CpG sites. Differential variance was assessed using the improved epigenetic variable outliers for risk prediction analysis (iEVORA) algorithm and methylation outliers were identified using a previously defined threshold (upper or lower quartile plus or minus three times the interquartile range, respectively). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: After correcting for multiple testing, we did not identify any significantly differentially methylated CpG sites, genes, promoters or CGIs between G3 and K-SICM children despite a lenient corrected P-value threshold of 0.1. Targeted analyses of (sites within) imprinted genes and birth weight-associated sites also did not identify any significant differences. The number of DNA methylation outliers per sample was comparable between the culture medium groups. iEVORA identified 101 differentially variable CpG sites of which 94 were more variable in the G3 group. LARGE SCALE DATA: Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE196432 LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: To detect significant methylation differences with a magnitude of <10% between the groups many more participants would be necessary; however, the clinical relevance of such small differences is unclear. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The results of this study are reassuring, suggesting that if there is an effect of the culture medium on DNA methylation (and methylation-mediated diseases risk), it does not differ between the two media investigated here. The findings concur with other methylome studies of ART neonates and children that underwent embryo culture in different media, which also found no significant methylome differences. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Study funded by March of Dimes (6-FY13-153), EVA (Erfelijkheid Voortplanting & Aanleg) specialty programme (grant no. KP111513) of Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+) and the Horizon 2020 innovation (ERIN) (grant no. EU952516) of the European Commission. The authors do not report any conflicts of interest relevant to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Trial register—NL4083 Oxford University Press 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9627755/ /pubmed/36206092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac213 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Koeck, Rebekka M
Busato, Florence
Tost, Jorg
Zandstra, Heleen
Remy, Sylvie
Langie, Sabine
Gielen, Marij
van Golde, Ron
Dumoulin, John C M
Brunner, Han
Zamani Esteki, Masoud
van Montfoort, Aafke P A
At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title_full At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title_fullStr At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title_full_unstemmed At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title_short At age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
title_sort at age 9, the methylome of assisted reproductive technology children that underwent embryo culture in different media is not significantly different on a genome-wide scale
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36206092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac213
work_keys_str_mv AT koeckrebekkam atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT busatoflorence atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT tostjorg atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT zandstraheleen atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT remysylvie atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT langiesabine atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT gielenmarij atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT vangolderon atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT dumoulinjohncm atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT brunnerhan atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT zamaniestekimasoud atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale
AT vanmontfoortaafkepa atage9themethylomeofassistedreproductivetechnologychildrenthatunderwentembryocultureindifferentmediaisnotsignificantlydifferentonagenomewidescale