Cargando…

5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening

BACKGROUND: The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB–openin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Cheol Hyun, Nam, Chang-Wook, Cho, Yun-Kyeong, Yoon, Hyuck-Jun, Kim, Kwon-Bae, Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol, Kim, Hyo-Soo, Chun, Woo Jung, Han, Seung Hwan, Rha, Seung-Woon, Chae, In-Ho, Jeong, Jin-Ok, Heo, Jung Ho, Yoon, Junghan, Lim, Do-Sun, Park, Jong-Seon, Hong, Myeong-Ki, Lee, Sung Yun, Cha, Kwang Soo, Kim, Doo-Il, Bae, Jang-Whan, Chang, Kiyuk, Hwang, Byung-Hee, Choi, So-Yeon, Jeong, Myung Ho, Choi, Ki Hong, Song, Young Bin, Hong, Soon-Jun, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Koo, Bon-Kwon, Hur, Seung-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002
_version_ 1784823057020354560
author Lee, Cheol Hyun
Nam, Chang-Wook
Cho, Yun-Kyeong
Yoon, Hyuck-Jun
Kim, Kwon-Bae
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Kim, Hyo-Soo
Chun, Woo Jung
Han, Seung Hwan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
Jeong, Jin-Ok
Heo, Jung Ho
Yoon, Junghan
Lim, Do-Sun
Park, Jong-Seon
Hong, Myeong-Ki
Lee, Sung Yun
Cha, Kwang Soo
Kim, Doo-Il
Bae, Jang-Whan
Chang, Kiyuk
Hwang, Byung-Hee
Choi, So-Yeon
Jeong, Myung Ho
Choi, Ki Hong
Song, Young Bin
Hong, Soon-Jun
Doh, Joon-Hyung
Koo, Bon-Kwon
Hur, Seung-Ho
author_facet Lee, Cheol Hyun
Nam, Chang-Wook
Cho, Yun-Kyeong
Yoon, Hyuck-Jun
Kim, Kwon-Bae
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Kim, Hyo-Soo
Chun, Woo Jung
Han, Seung Hwan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
Jeong, Jin-Ok
Heo, Jung Ho
Yoon, Junghan
Lim, Do-Sun
Park, Jong-Seon
Hong, Myeong-Ki
Lee, Sung Yun
Cha, Kwang Soo
Kim, Doo-Il
Bae, Jang-Whan
Chang, Kiyuk
Hwang, Byung-Hee
Choi, So-Yeon
Jeong, Myung Ho
Choi, Ki Hong
Song, Young Bin
Hong, Soon-Jun
Doh, Joon-Hyung
Koo, Bon-Kwon
Hur, Seung-Ho
author_sort Lee, Cheol Hyun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB–opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover–alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). RESULTS: Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9627822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96278222022-11-04 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening Lee, Cheol Hyun Nam, Chang-Wook Cho, Yun-Kyeong Yoon, Hyuck-Jun Kim, Kwon-Bae Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol Kim, Hyo-Soo Chun, Woo Jung Han, Seung Hwan Rha, Seung-Woon Chae, In-Ho Jeong, Jin-Ok Heo, Jung Ho Yoon, Junghan Lim, Do-Sun Park, Jong-Seon Hong, Myeong-Ki Lee, Sung Yun Cha, Kwang Soo Kim, Doo-Il Bae, Jang-Whan Chang, Kiyuk Hwang, Byung-Hee Choi, So-Yeon Jeong, Myung Ho Choi, Ki Hong Song, Young Bin Hong, Soon-Jun Doh, Joon-Hyung Koo, Bon-Kwon Hur, Seung-Ho JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: The optimal side branch (SB) treatment strategy after simple crossover stenting in bifurcation lesions is still controversial. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of a 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone versus with an additional SB–opening procedure in patients with left main (LM) and non-LM coronary bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with a 1-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions including LM were selected from the COBIS (Coronary Bifurcation Stenting) III registry and divided into the simple crossover–alone group and SB-opening group. Clinical outcomes were assessed by the 5-year rate of target lesion failure (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion repeat revascularization). RESULTS: Among 2,194 patients who underwent the 1-stent strategy, 1,685 (76.8%) patients were treated with simple crossover alone, and 509 (23.2%) patients were treated with an additional SB-opening procedure. Although the baseline SB angiographic disease was more severe in the SB-opening group, the final lumen diameter of the SB was larger. The 5-year observed target lesion failure rate was similar between the 2 groups (7.0% in the simple crossover vs. 6.7% in SB-opening group; hazard ratio: 0.99; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.48; p = 0.947), even in the subgroup analyses including LM (9.5% vs. 11.3%; p = 0.442) and true bifurcation (5.3% vs. 7.8%; p = 0.362). The results were not changed after an inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment. There was no difference in the overall and SB-related target lesion revascularization rate in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term clinical outcome of the 1-stent strategy with simple crossover alone for coronary bifurcation lesions was acceptable compared to those of additional SB-opening procedures. (Korean Coronary Bifurcation Stenting [COBIS] Registry III [COBIS III]; NCT03068494) Elsevier 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9627822/ /pubmed/36338374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lee, Cheol Hyun
Nam, Chang-Wook
Cho, Yun-Kyeong
Yoon, Hyuck-Jun
Kim, Kwon-Bae
Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
Kim, Hyo-Soo
Chun, Woo Jung
Han, Seung Hwan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
Jeong, Jin-Ok
Heo, Jung Ho
Yoon, Junghan
Lim, Do-Sun
Park, Jong-Seon
Hong, Myeong-Ki
Lee, Sung Yun
Cha, Kwang Soo
Kim, Doo-Il
Bae, Jang-Whan
Chang, Kiyuk
Hwang, Byung-Hee
Choi, So-Yeon
Jeong, Myung Ho
Choi, Ki Hong
Song, Young Bin
Hong, Soon-Jun
Doh, Joon-Hyung
Koo, Bon-Kwon
Hur, Seung-Ho
5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title_full 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title_fullStr 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title_full_unstemmed 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title_short 5-Year Outcome of Simple Crossover Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Compared With Side Branch Opening
title_sort 5-year outcome of simple crossover stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions compared with side branch opening
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT leecheolhyun 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT namchangwook 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT choyunkyeong 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT yoonhyuckjun 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT kimkwonbae 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT gwonhyeoncheol 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT kimhyosoo 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT chunwoojung 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT hanseunghwan 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT rhaseungwoon 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT chaeinho 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT jeongjinok 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT heojungho 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT yoonjunghan 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT limdosun 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT parkjongseon 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT hongmyeongki 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT leesungyun 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT chakwangsoo 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT kimdooil 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT baejangwhan 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT changkiyuk 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT hwangbyunghee 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT choisoyeon 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT jeongmyungho 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT choikihong 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT songyoungbin 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT hongsoonjun 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT dohjoonhyung 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT koobonkwon 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening
AT hurseungho 5yearoutcomeofsimplecrossoverstentingincoronarybifurcationlesionscomparedwithsidebranchopening