Cargando…
Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance
BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.011 |
_version_ | 1784823073203027968 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Chee Hae Yang, Seokhun Zhang, Jinlong Lee, Joo Myung Hoshino, Masahiro Murai, Tadashi Hwang, Doyeon Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Nam, Chang-Wook Wang, Jianan Chen, Shao-Liang Tanaka, Nobuhiro Matsuo, Hitoshi Akasaka, Takashi Kakuta, Tsunekazu Koo, Bon-Kwon |
author_facet | Kim, Chee Hae Yang, Seokhun Zhang, Jinlong Lee, Joo Myung Hoshino, Masahiro Murai, Tadashi Hwang, Doyeon Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Nam, Chang-Wook Wang, Jianan Chen, Shao-Liang Tanaka, Nobuhiro Matsuo, Hitoshi Akasaka, Takashi Kakuta, Tsunekazu Koo, Bon-Kwon |
author_sort | Kim, Chee Hae |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological significance. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a pooled population of multicenter, international prospective cohorts. Patients (166 women and 489 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) within 90 days before invasive FFR measurements were included. The minimal lumen area, percent of plaque burden, whole vessel plaque volume by composition, high-risk plaque characteristics, and LV mass were analyzed from CCTA images. RESULTS: Among 1,188 vessels analyzed, the FFR value was higher in women than that in men (0.85 ± 0.13 vs 0.82 ± 0.14; P = 0.001) despite a similar percentage of diameter stenosis between the sexes (45.9% ± 18.9% vs 46.1% ± 17.7%; P = 0.920). The composition of fibrofatty plaque + necrotic core (13.1% ± 16.9% vs 21.2% ± 19.9%; P < 0.001) and frequencies of low attenuation plaque (12.7% vs 24.5%; P < 0.001) and positive remodeling (33.8% vs 45.5%; P = 0.001) were lower in women than in men. Vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than that in men (all P < 0.001); however, no sex difference was observed in any of these parameters after adjustment for LV mass (all P > 0.10). Sex was not an independent predictor of the FFR value after adjustment for stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and LV mass. CONCLUSIONS: Higher FFR values for the same stenosis severity in women can be explained by fewer high-risk plaque characteristics and smaller myocardial mass in women than that in men. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9627886 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96278862022-11-04 Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance Kim, Chee Hae Yang, Seokhun Zhang, Jinlong Lee, Joo Myung Hoshino, Masahiro Murai, Tadashi Hwang, Doyeon Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Nam, Chang-Wook Wang, Jianan Chen, Shao-Liang Tanaka, Nobuhiro Matsuo, Hitoshi Akasaka, Takashi Kakuta, Tsunekazu Koo, Bon-Kwon JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological significance. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of a pooled population of multicenter, international prospective cohorts. Patients (166 women and 489 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) within 90 days before invasive FFR measurements were included. The minimal lumen area, percent of plaque burden, whole vessel plaque volume by composition, high-risk plaque characteristics, and LV mass were analyzed from CCTA images. RESULTS: Among 1,188 vessels analyzed, the FFR value was higher in women than that in men (0.85 ± 0.13 vs 0.82 ± 0.14; P = 0.001) despite a similar percentage of diameter stenosis between the sexes (45.9% ± 18.9% vs 46.1% ± 17.7%; P = 0.920). The composition of fibrofatty plaque + necrotic core (13.1% ± 16.9% vs 21.2% ± 19.9%; P < 0.001) and frequencies of low attenuation plaque (12.7% vs 24.5%; P < 0.001) and positive remodeling (33.8% vs 45.5%; P = 0.001) were lower in women than in men. Vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than that in men (all P < 0.001); however, no sex difference was observed in any of these parameters after adjustment for LV mass (all P > 0.10). Sex was not an independent predictor of the FFR value after adjustment for stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and LV mass. CONCLUSIONS: Higher FFR values for the same stenosis severity in women can be explained by fewer high-risk plaque characteristics and smaller myocardial mass in women than that in men. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163) Elsevier 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9627886/ /pubmed/36339124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.011 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kim, Chee Hae Yang, Seokhun Zhang, Jinlong Lee, Joo Myung Hoshino, Masahiro Murai, Tadashi Hwang, Doyeon Shin, Eun-Seok Doh, Joon-Hyung Nam, Chang-Wook Wang, Jianan Chen, Shao-Liang Tanaka, Nobuhiro Matsuo, Hitoshi Akasaka, Takashi Kakuta, Tsunekazu Koo, Bon-Kwon Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title | Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title_full | Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title_fullStr | Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title_short | Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass: Implications for Physiological Significance |
title_sort | differences in plaque characteristics and myocardial mass: implications for physiological significance |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627886/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimcheehae differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT yangseokhun differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT zhangjinlong differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT leejoomyung differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT hoshinomasahiro differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT muraitadashi differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT hwangdoyeon differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT shineunseok differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT dohjoonhyung differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT namchangwook differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT wangjianan differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT chenshaoliang differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT tanakanobuhiro differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT matsuohitoshi differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT akasakatakashi differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT kakutatsunekazu differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance AT koobonkwon differencesinplaquecharacteristicsandmyocardialmassimplicationsforphysiologicalsignificance |