Cargando…
Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the relative performances of diverse contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contemporary second-gener...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.008 |
_version_ | 1784823075486826496 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Yeong Jin Hyun, Junho Lee, Junghoon Kim, Ju Hyeon Yang, Yujin Choe, Kyungjin Lee, Ji Sung Park, Hanbit Cho, Sang-Cheol Kang, Do-Yoon Lee, Pil Hyung Ahn, Jung-Min Park, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung |
author_facet | Jeong, Yeong Jin Hyun, Junho Lee, Junghoon Kim, Ju Hyeon Yang, Yujin Choe, Kyungjin Lee, Ji Sung Park, Hanbit Cho, Sang-Cheol Kang, Do-Yoon Lee, Pil Hyung Ahn, Jung-Min Park, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung |
author_sort | Jeong, Yeong Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the relative performances of diverse contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contemporary second-generation DES for CHIP patients in “real-world” settings. METHODS: Of 28,843 patients enrolled in the IRIS-DES registry, a total of 6,645 patients with CHIP characteristics who received 5 different types of contemporary DES were finally included: 3,752 with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 1,258 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), 864 with platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 437 with ultrathin strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (UT-SES), and 334 with bioresorbable polymer SES (BP-SES). The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rate of target-vessel failure was highest in the CoCr-EES (7.1%) group; intermediate in the Re-ZES (5.0%), PtCr-EES (4.6%), and BP-SES (4.2%) groups; and lowest in the UT-SES (3.8%) group (overall long-rank P = 0.001). In multiple-treatment propensity-score analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for target-vessel failure were significantly lower in the Re-ZES (HR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.97), the UT-SES (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.95), and BP-SES (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70) groups than in the CoCr-EES group (referent). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary PCI registry, we observed the differential risks of target-vessel failure according to various types of contemporary DES in patients with CHIP characteristics. However, owing to inherent selection bias, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further randomized trials. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9627895 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96278952022-11-04 Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures Jeong, Yeong Jin Hyun, Junho Lee, Junghoon Kim, Ju Hyeon Yang, Yujin Choe, Kyungjin Lee, Ji Sung Park, Hanbit Cho, Sang-Cheol Kang, Do-Yoon Lee, Pil Hyung Ahn, Jung-Min Park, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the relative performances of diverse contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of contemporary second-generation DES for CHIP patients in “real-world” settings. METHODS: Of 28,843 patients enrolled in the IRIS-DES registry, a total of 6,645 patients with CHIP characteristics who received 5 different types of contemporary DES were finally included: 3,752 with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), 1,258 with Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents (Re-ZES), 864 with platinum-chromium EES (PtCr-EES), 437 with ultrathin strut biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (UT-SES), and 334 with bioresorbable polymer SES (BP-SES). The primary outcome was target-vessel failure (a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the rate of target-vessel failure was highest in the CoCr-EES (7.1%) group; intermediate in the Re-ZES (5.0%), PtCr-EES (4.6%), and BP-SES (4.2%) groups; and lowest in the UT-SES (3.8%) group (overall long-rank P = 0.001). In multiple-treatment propensity-score analysis, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for target-vessel failure were significantly lower in the Re-ZES (HR: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-0.97), the UT-SES (HR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.95), and BP-SES (HR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16-0.70) groups than in the CoCr-EES group (referent). CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary PCI registry, we observed the differential risks of target-vessel failure according to various types of contemporary DES in patients with CHIP characteristics. However, owing to inherent selection bias, the results should be considered hypothesis-generating, highlighting the need for further randomized trials. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133) Elsevier 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9627895/ /pubmed/36339122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.008 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jeong, Yeong Jin Hyun, Junho Lee, Junghoon Kim, Ju Hyeon Yang, Yujin Choe, Kyungjin Lee, Ji Sung Park, Hanbit Cho, Sang-Cheol Kang, Do-Yoon Lee, Pil Hyung Ahn, Jung-Min Park, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title | Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title_full | Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title_short | Comparison of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients Undergoing Complex High-Risk Indicated Procedures |
title_sort | comparison of contemporary drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing complex high-risk indicated procedures |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.10.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongyeongjin comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT hyunjunho comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT leejunghoon comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT kimjuhyeon comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT yangyujin comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT choekyungjin comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT leejisung comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT parkhanbit comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT chosangcheol comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT kangdoyoon comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT leepilhyung comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT ahnjungmin comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT parkdukwoo comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT parkseungjung comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures AT comparisonofcontemporarydrugelutingstentsinpatientsundergoingcomplexhighriskindicatedprocedures |