Cargando…

Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The Genoss DCB is a novel paclitaxel-coated balloon with a shellac plus vitamin E excipient that enhances drug delivery to the target lesion, minimizing restenosis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to inv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jun, Eun Jung, Shin, Eun-Seok, Yuan, Song Lin, Bhak, Youngjune, Garg, Scot, Kang, Woong Chol, Kim, Je Sang, Kim, June-Hong, Bae, Jang-Whan, Rha, Seung-Woon, Chae, In-Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.015
_version_ 1784823075973365760
author Jun, Eun Jung
Shin, Eun-Seok
Yuan, Song Lin
Bhak, Youngjune
Garg, Scot
Kang, Woong Chol
Kim, Je Sang
Kim, June-Hong
Bae, Jang-Whan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
author_facet Jun, Eun Jung
Shin, Eun-Seok
Yuan, Song Lin
Bhak, Youngjune
Garg, Scot
Kang, Woong Chol
Kim, Je Sang
Kim, June-Hong
Bae, Jang-Whan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
author_sort Jun, Eun Jung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The Genoss DCB is a novel paclitaxel-coated balloon with a shellac plus vitamin E excipient that enhances drug delivery to the target lesion, minimizing restenosis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the angiographic efficacy, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB in a randomized controlled trial designed to enable regulatory approval of this new device in South Korea. METHODS: This noninferiority trial randomized patients experiencing their first ISR to the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB or the reference SeQuent Please iopromide-based DCB in a 1:1 ratio. All patients underwent planned angiographic and clinical follow-up at 6 months. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 6 months in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). RESULTS: A total of 82 patients from 7 centers were randomized to either the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB group (n = 41) or the reference iopromide-based DCB group (n = 41). The 6-month in-segment LLL was 0.15 ± 0.43 mm with the novel DCB compared with 0.24 ± 0.39 mm with the reference device. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.13 mm, lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.29 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). Major cardiovascular events were comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (7.7% for the novel DCB vs 10.3% for the reference DCB; P = 0.692). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, head-to-head comparison randomized trial, the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB showed a comparable result to the reference iopromide-based device for the primary endpoint of 6-month in-segment LLL for the treatment of coronary ISR. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please in Korean Patient With Coronary In-stent Restenosis; NCT04405063)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9627897
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96278972022-11-04 Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial Jun, Eun Jung Shin, Eun-Seok Yuan, Song Lin Bhak, Youngjune Garg, Scot Kang, Woong Chol Kim, Je Sang Kim, June-Hong Bae, Jang-Whan Rha, Seung-Woon Chae, In-Ho JACC Asia Original Research BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) offer an effective treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). The Genoss DCB is a novel paclitaxel-coated balloon with a shellac plus vitamin E excipient that enhances drug delivery to the target lesion, minimizing restenosis. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the angiographic efficacy, clinical safety, and effectiveness of the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB in a randomized controlled trial designed to enable regulatory approval of this new device in South Korea. METHODS: This noninferiority trial randomized patients experiencing their first ISR to the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB or the reference SeQuent Please iopromide-based DCB in a 1:1 ratio. All patients underwent planned angiographic and clinical follow-up at 6 months. The study was powered for the primary endpoint of 6 months in-segment late lumen loss (LLL). RESULTS: A total of 82 patients from 7 centers were randomized to either the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB group (n = 41) or the reference iopromide-based DCB group (n = 41). The 6-month in-segment LLL was 0.15 ± 0.43 mm with the novel DCB compared with 0.24 ± 0.39 mm with the reference device. The 1-sided 97.5% upper confidence limit of the difference was 0.13 mm, lower than the noninferiority limit of 0.29 mm, achieving noninferiority (P for noninferiority = 0.001). Major cardiovascular events were comparable between 2 groups at 6 months (7.7% for the novel DCB vs 10.3% for the reference DCB; P = 0.692). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, head-to-head comparison randomized trial, the novel shellac plus vitamin E–based DCB showed a comparable result to the reference iopromide-based device for the primary endpoint of 6-month in-segment LLL for the treatment of coronary ISR. (Compare the Safety and Efficacy of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please in Korean Patient With Coronary In-stent Restenosis; NCT04405063) Elsevier 2022-03-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9627897/ /pubmed/36339121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.015 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jun, Eun Jung
Shin, Eun-Seok
Yuan, Song Lin
Bhak, Youngjune
Garg, Scot
Kang, Woong Chol
Kim, Je Sang
Kim, June-Hong
Bae, Jang-Whan
Rha, Seung-Woon
Chae, In-Ho
Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Comparison of 2 Different Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons in Coronary In-Stent Restenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort comparison of 2 different paclitaxel-coated balloons in coronary in-stent restenosis: a randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9627897/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36339121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.11.015
work_keys_str_mv AT juneunjung comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shineunseok comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuansonglin comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bhakyoungjune comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gargscot comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kangwoongchol comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimjesang comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kimjunehong comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT baejangwhan comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rhaseungwoon comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chaeinho comparisonof2differentpaclitaxelcoatedballoonsincoronaryinstentrestenosisarandomizedcontrolledtrial