Cargando…

Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan

AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishigori, Tatsuto, Ichihara, Nao, Obama, Kazutaka, Uyama, Ichiro, Miyata, Hiroaki, Inomata, Masafumi, Kakeji, Yoshihiro, Kitagawa, Yuko, Sakai, Yoshiharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579
_version_ 1784823148283166720
author Nishigori, Tatsuto
Ichihara, Nao
Obama, Kazutaka
Uyama, Ichiro
Miyata, Hiroaki
Inomata, Masafumi
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Kitagawa, Yuko
Sakai, Yoshiharu
author_facet Nishigori, Tatsuto
Ichihara, Nao
Obama, Kazutaka
Uyama, Ichiro
Miyata, Hiroaki
Inomata, Masafumi
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Kitagawa, Yuko
Sakai, Yoshiharu
author_sort Nishigori, Tatsuto
collection PubMed
description AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surgery using a Japanese nationwide web‐based database. METHODS: Patients who underwent the following robotic surgeries for malignant tumors in 2018 were included: esophagectomy (RE), total gastrectomy (RTG), distal gastrectomy (RDG), proximal gastrectomy (RPG), low anterior resection (RLAR), and rectal resections other than RLAR (RRR). The number of cases and surgical mortality rates each month were calculated to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients underwent robotic gastrointestinal surgery. The monthly number of robotic surgeries nearly doubled in April 2018 when they were initially reimbursed by the National Health Insurance system. Operative mortality rates were 0.9%, 0.4%, 0.2%, and 2.8% for RE (n = 330), RTG (n = 239), RDG (n = 1167), and RPG (n = 109), respectively. No mortality was observed in RLAR (n = 1062) or RRR (n = 374). CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors was safely introduced into daily clinical practice along with rigorous surgeon and facility standards in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9628217
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-96282172022-11-03 Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan Nishigori, Tatsuto Ichihara, Nao Obama, Kazutaka Uyama, Ichiro Miyata, Hiroaki Inomata, Masafumi Kakeji, Yoshihiro Kitagawa, Yuko Sakai, Yoshiharu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surgery using a Japanese nationwide web‐based database. METHODS: Patients who underwent the following robotic surgeries for malignant tumors in 2018 were included: esophagectomy (RE), total gastrectomy (RTG), distal gastrectomy (RDG), proximal gastrectomy (RPG), low anterior resection (RLAR), and rectal resections other than RLAR (RRR). The number of cases and surgical mortality rates each month were calculated to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients underwent robotic gastrointestinal surgery. The monthly number of robotic surgeries nearly doubled in April 2018 when they were initially reimbursed by the National Health Insurance system. Operative mortality rates were 0.9%, 0.4%, 0.2%, and 2.8% for RE (n = 330), RTG (n = 239), RDG (n = 1167), and RPG (n = 109), respectively. No mortality was observed in RLAR (n = 1062) or RRR (n = 374). CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors was safely introduced into daily clinical practice along with rigorous surgeon and facility standards in Japan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9628217/ /pubmed/36338596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nishigori, Tatsuto
Ichihara, Nao
Obama, Kazutaka
Uyama, Ichiro
Miyata, Hiroaki
Inomata, Masafumi
Kakeji, Yoshihiro
Kitagawa, Yuko
Sakai, Yoshiharu
Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title_full Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title_fullStr Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title_short Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
title_sort prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in japan
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628217/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579
work_keys_str_mv AT nishigoritatsuto prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT ichiharanao prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT obamakazutaka prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT uyamaichiro prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT miyatahiroaki prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT inomatamasafumi prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT kakejiyoshihiro prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT kitagawayuko prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan
AT sakaiyoshiharu prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan