Cargando…
Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan
AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579 |
_version_ | 1784823148283166720 |
---|---|
author | Nishigori, Tatsuto Ichihara, Nao Obama, Kazutaka Uyama, Ichiro Miyata, Hiroaki Inomata, Masafumi Kakeji, Yoshihiro Kitagawa, Yuko Sakai, Yoshiharu |
author_facet | Nishigori, Tatsuto Ichihara, Nao Obama, Kazutaka Uyama, Ichiro Miyata, Hiroaki Inomata, Masafumi Kakeji, Yoshihiro Kitagawa, Yuko Sakai, Yoshiharu |
author_sort | Nishigori, Tatsuto |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surgery using a Japanese nationwide web‐based database. METHODS: Patients who underwent the following robotic surgeries for malignant tumors in 2018 were included: esophagectomy (RE), total gastrectomy (RTG), distal gastrectomy (RDG), proximal gastrectomy (RPG), low anterior resection (RLAR), and rectal resections other than RLAR (RRR). The number of cases and surgical mortality rates each month were calculated to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients underwent robotic gastrointestinal surgery. The monthly number of robotic surgeries nearly doubled in April 2018 when they were initially reimbursed by the National Health Insurance system. Operative mortality rates were 0.9%, 0.4%, 0.2%, and 2.8% for RE (n = 330), RTG (n = 239), RDG (n = 1167), and RPG (n = 109), respectively. No mortality was observed in RLAR (n = 1062) or RRR (n = 374). CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors was safely introduced into daily clinical practice along with rigorous surgeon and facility standards in Japan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9628217 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-96282172022-11-03 Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan Nishigori, Tatsuto Ichihara, Nao Obama, Kazutaka Uyama, Ichiro Miyata, Hiroaki Inomata, Masafumi Kakeji, Yoshihiro Kitagawa, Yuko Sakai, Yoshiharu Ann Gastroenterol Surg Original Articles AIM: The National Health Insurance system has reimbursed robotic gastrointestinal surgery since April 2018 in Japan. Additionally, strict facility and surgeon standards were established by the government and the academic society. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic surgery using a Japanese nationwide web‐based database. METHODS: Patients who underwent the following robotic surgeries for malignant tumors in 2018 were included: esophagectomy (RE), total gastrectomy (RTG), distal gastrectomy (RDG), proximal gastrectomy (RPG), low anterior resection (RLAR), and rectal resections other than RLAR (RRR). The number of cases and surgical mortality rates each month were calculated to evaluate the prevalence and safety of robotic procedures. RESULTS: A total of 3281 patients underwent robotic gastrointestinal surgery. The monthly number of robotic surgeries nearly doubled in April 2018 when they were initially reimbursed by the National Health Insurance system. Operative mortality rates were 0.9%, 0.4%, 0.2%, and 2.8% for RE (n = 330), RTG (n = 239), RDG (n = 1167), and RPG (n = 109), respectively. No mortality was observed in RLAR (n = 1062) or RRR (n = 374). CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors was safely introduced into daily clinical practice along with rigorous surgeon and facility standards in Japan. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9628217/ /pubmed/36338596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Nishigori, Tatsuto Ichihara, Nao Obama, Kazutaka Uyama, Ichiro Miyata, Hiroaki Inomata, Masafumi Kakeji, Yoshihiro Kitagawa, Yuko Sakai, Yoshiharu Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title | Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title_full | Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title_fullStr | Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title_short | Prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in Japan |
title_sort | prevalence and safety of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal malignant tumors in japan |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628217/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36338596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nishigoritatsuto prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT ichiharanao prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT obamakazutaka prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT uyamaichiro prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT miyatahiroaki prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT inomatamasafumi prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT kakejiyoshihiro prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT kitagawayuko prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan AT sakaiyoshiharu prevalenceandsafetyofroboticsurgeryforgastrointestinalmalignanttumorsinjapan |